Dynamics of hydrated polyurethane biomaterials: Surface microphase restructuring, protein activity and platelet adhesion

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1938-1947

  Xu, Li Chong ^a   Runt, James ^b   Siedlecki, Christopher A ^a  

^a PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AFM; Fibrinogen; Phase separation; Platelet adhesion; Polyurethane

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BINDING SITES; BIOMATERIALS; CARBOHYDRATES; DYNAMICS; HYDRATION; HYDROPHILICITY; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PHASE SEPARATION; PLATELETS; POLYURETHANES; PROTEINS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

ATOMIC-FORCE-MICROSCOPY; BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; BIOMATERIAL SURFACES; FIBRINOGEN; HARD DOMAIN; MICRO-PHASE; PLATELETS ADHESIONS; PROTEIN ACTIVITY; SEGMENTED POLYURETHANES; SOFT SEGMENTS CHEMISTRY;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY;

BIOMATERIAL; FIBRINOGEN; POLYURETHAN; WATER;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; HYDROPHILICITY; NONHUMAN; PHASE SEPARATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; THROMBOCYTE ADHESION; ANIMAL; CATTLE; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; CRYSTALLIZATION; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; THROMBOCYTE; THROMBOCYTE ACTIVATION; THROMBOCYTE ADHESIVENESS;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BLOOD PLATELETS; CATTLE; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; CRYSTALLIZATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PLATELET ACTIVATION; PLATELET ADHESIVENESS; POLYURETHANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 77956642474     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.031     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Lamba NMK, Woodhouse KA, Cooper SL. Polyurethanes in biomedical applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1998.
2. Zdrahala RJ, Zdrahala IJ. Biomedical applications of polyurethanes: a review of past promises, present realities, and a vibrant future. J Biomater Appl 1999;14:67.
3. Phillips RA, Cooper SL. Phase-separation in crystallizable multiblock poly (ether-ester) copolymers with poly (tetramethylene isophthalate) hard segments. Polymer 1994;35:4146.
4. Groth T, Klosz K, Campbell EJ, New RRC, Hall B, Goering H. Protein adsorption, lymphocyte adhesion and platelet-adhesion activation on polyurethane ureas is related to hard segment content and composition. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1994;6:497.
5. Hsu SH, Kao YC. Cell attachment and proliferation on poly (carbonate urethanes) with various degrees of nanophase separation. Macromol Biosci 2004;4:891.
6. Hsu SH, Kao YC. Biocompatibility of poly (carbonate urethane) s with various degrees of nanophase separation. Macromol Biosci 2005;5:246.
7. Velankar S, Cooper SL. Microphase separation and rheological properties of polyurethane melts. 1. Effect of block length. Macromolecules 1998;31:9181.
8. Velankar S, Cooper SL. Microphase separation and rheological properties of polyurethane melts. 2. Effect of block incompatibility on the microstructure. Macromolecules 2000;33:382.
9. Garrett JT, Lin JS, Runt J. Influence of preparation conditions on microdomain formation in poly (urethane urea) block copolymers. Macromolecules 2002;35:161.
10. Hernandez R, Weksler J, Padsalgikar A, Runt J. Microstructural organization of three-phase polydimethylsiloxane-based segmented polyurethanes. Macromolecules 2007;40:5441.
11. Garrett JT, Siedlecki CA, Runt J. Microdomain morphology of poly (urethane urea) multiblock copolymers. Macromolecules 2001;34:7066.
12. Garrett JT, Xu RJ, Cho JD, Runt J. Phase separation of diamine chain-extended poly (urethane) copolymers: FTIR spectroscopy and phase transitions. Polymer 2003;44:2711.
13. Garrett JT, Runt J, Lin JS. Microphase separation of segmented poly (urethane urea) block copolymers. Macromolecules 2000;33:6353.
14. Tingey KG, Andrade JD. Probing surface microheterogeneity of poly (ether urethanes) in an aqueous environment. Langmuir 1991;7:2471.
15. Magnani A, Barbucci R, Lewis KB, Leachscampavia D, Ratner BD. Surfaceproperties and restruturing of a crosslinked polyurethane-poly (amino-amine) network. J Mater Chem 1995;5:1321.
16. Lewis KB, Ratner BD. Observation of surface rearrangement of polymers using ESCA. J Colloid Interface Sci 1993;159:77.
17. Senshu K, Kobayashi M, Ikawa N, Yamashita S, Hirao A, Nakahama S. Relationship between morphology of microphase-separated structure and phase restructuring at the surface of poly[2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-block-4-(7'- octenyl) styrene] diblock copolymers corresponding to environmental change. Langmuir 1999;15:1763.
18. Senshu K, Yamashita S, Mori H, Ito M, Hirao A, Nakahama S. Time-resolved surface rearrangements of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-block-isoprene) in response to environmental changes. Langmuir 1999;15:1754.
19. Fasolka MJ, Mayes AM, Magonov SN. Thermal enhancement of AFM phase contrast for imaging diblock copolymer thin film morphology. Ultramicroscopy 2001;90:21.
20. Agnihotri A, Garrett JT, Runt J, Siedlecki CA. Atomic force microscopy visualization of poly (urethane urea) microphase rearrangements under aqueous environment. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2006;17:227.
21. Xu LC, Siedlecki CA. Microphase separation structure influences protein interactions with poly (urethane urea) surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A, in press.
22. Xu LC, Soman P, Runt J, Siedlecki CA. Characterization of surface microphase structures of poly (urethane urea) biomaterials by nanoscale indentation with AFM. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2007;18:353.
23. Gunatillake PA, Meijs GF, McCarthy SJ, Adhikari R. Poly (dimethylsiloxane)/poly (hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol based polyurethane elastomers. I. Synthesis and properties. J Appl Polym Sci 2000;76:2026.
24. Hernandez R, Weksler J, Padsalgikar A, Runt J. A comparison of phase organization of model segmented polyurethanes with different intersegment compatibilities. Macromolecules 2008;41:9767.
25. Hansen JC, Lim JY, Xu LC, Siedlecki CA, Mauger DT, Donahue HJ. Effect of surface nanoscale topography on elastic modulus of individual osteoblastic cells as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech 2007;40:2865.
26. Soman P, Rice Z, Siedlecki CA. Measuring the time-dependent functional activity of adsorbed fibrinogen by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2008;24:8801.
27. Agnihotri A, Siedlecki CA. Adhesion mode atomic force microscopy study of dual component protein films. Ultramicroscopy 2005;102:257.
28. Magonov SN, Elings V, Whangbo MH. Phase imaging and stiffness in tappingmode atomic force microscopy. Surf. Sci. 1997;375: L385.
29. Goodman SL, Cooper SL, Albrecht RM. Integrin receptors and platelet-adhesion to synthetic surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:683.
30. Marchant RE, Siedlecki CA, Barb MD, Shainoff JR. Three dimensional structure of fibrinogen visualized under aqueous conditions. Thromb Haemost 1997: P3098.
31. Farrell DH, Thiagarajan P. Binding of recombinant fibrinogen mutants to platelets. J Biol Chem 1994;269:226.
32. Sanchez MS, Mateo JM, Colomer FJR, Ribelles JLG. Nanoindentation and tapping mode AFM study of phase separation in poly (ethyl acrylate- cohydroxyethyl methacrylate) copolymer networks. Eur Polym J 2006;42:1378.
33. Bischel MS, Vanlandingham MR, Eduljee RF, Gillespie JW, Schultz JM. On the use of nanoscale indentation with the AFM in the identification of phases in blends of linear low density polyethylene and high density polyethylene. J Mater Sci 2000;35:221.
34. Chizhik SA, Huang Z, Gorbunov VV, Myshkin NK, Tsukruk VV. Micromechanical properties of elastic polymeric materials as probed by scanning force microscopy. Langmuir 1998;14:2606.
35. Pharr GM, Oliver WC, Brotzen FR. On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastics-modulus during indentation. J Mater Res 1992;7:613.
36. Tsai WB, Grunkemeier JM, Horbett TA. Variations in the ability of adsorbed fibrinogen to mediate platelet adhesion to polystyrene-based materials: a multivariate statistical analysis of antibody binding to the platelet binding sites of fibrinogen. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67 A: 1255.
37. Tzoneva R, Heuchel M, Groth T, Altankov G, Albrecht W, Paul D. Fibrinogen adsorption and platelet interactions on polymer membranes. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2002;13:1033.
38. Wang YX, Robertson JL, Spillman WB, Claus RO. Effects of the chemical structure and the surface properties of polymeric biomaterials on their biocompatibility. Pharm Res 2004;21:1362.
39. Castner DG, Ratner BD. Biomedical surface science. Foundations to frontiers. Surf Sci 2002;500:28.
40. Hantgan RR, Francis CW, Mardner VJ. Fibrinogen structure and physiology. In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Salzman EW, editors. Hemostasis and thrombosis: basic principles and clinical practice. Philadelphiia: J. B. Lippincott; 1994.