Using public databases to study relative program impact

Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 57-68

  Azzam, Tarek ^a   Christie, Christina ^a  

^a CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956627889     PISSN: 08341516     EISSN: 00077720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bertrand, W., Mock, N.B., & Franklin, R. (1981). Social indicators: Their use in evaluation research. In R. Conner (Ed.), Methodological advances in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Kirk, R. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. New York: Brooks/Cole.
3. National Research Council. (2002). Scientifi c research in education. Committee on scientifi c principles for education research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Patton, M.Q. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation: A new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Scriven, M. (2004). Claremont Graduate University debate on establishing causality. Retrieved October 23, 2005, from .
6. Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasiexperimental designs: For generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Miffl in.
7. Stewart, D. (1984). Secondary research: Information sources and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Webb, E., Campbell, D., Schwartz, R., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
9. Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.