A correspondence analysis revealed frailty deficits aggregate and are multidimensional

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 647-654

  Sourial, Nadia ^a   Wolfson, Christina ^a,b,c   Bergman, Howard ^a,d,e   Zhu, Bin ^b   Karunananthan, Sathya ^a   Quail, Jacqueline ^b,c   Fletcher, John ^a   Weiss, Deborah ^b,c   Bandeen Roche, Karen ^f   Béland, François ^a,d,e  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^f JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Association; Domains of frailty; Epidemiology; Frailty; Multiple correspondence analysis; Older persons

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CANADA; COGNITION; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMENTIA; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOOD; MULTIPLE CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NUTRITION; PATIENT MOBILITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AFFECT; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STATISTICS;

AFFECT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COGNITION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRAIL ELDERLY; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77956622162     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hogan DB, MacKnight C, Bergman H. Models, definitions, and criteria of frailty. Aging Clin Exp Res 2003;15(3 Suppl):1-29.
2. Bergman H, Ferrucci L, Guralnik J, Hogan DB, Hummel S, Karunananthan S, et al. Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigmdissues and controversies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007;62:731-7.
3. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56(3):M146-56.
4. Woods NF, LaCroix AZ, Gray SL, Aragaki A, Cochrane BB, Brunner RL, et al. Frailty: emergence and consequences in women aged 65 and older in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:1321-30.
5. Strawbridge WJ, Shema SJ, Balfour JL, Higby HR, Kaplan GA. Antecedents of frailty over three decades in an older cohort. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1998;53(1):S9-S16.
6. Chin APM, Dekker JM, Feskens EJ, Schouten EG, Kromhout D. How to select a frail elderly population? A comparison of three working definitions. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52(11):1015-21.
7. Puts MT, Lips P, Deeg DJ. Static and dynamic measures of frailty predicted decline in performance-based and self-reported physical functioning. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:1188-98.
8. Mitnitski A, Song X, Skoog I, Broe GA, Cox JL, Grunfeld E, et al. Relative fitness and frailty of elderly men and women in developed countries and their relationship with mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:2184-9.
9. Bandeen-Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, Walston J, Guralnik JM, Chaves P, et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the women's health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61(3): 262-6.
10. Quail JM, Addona V, Wolfson C, Podoba JE, Levésque LY, Dupuis J. Association of unmet need with self-rated health in a community dwelling cohort of disabled seniors aged 75 and over. Eur J Ageing 2007;4(1):45-55.
11. Canadian Study of Health and Aging Working Group. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging: study methods and prevalence of dementia. CMAJ 1994;150:899-913.
12. Beland F, Bergman H, Lebel P, Clarfield AM, Tousignant P, Contandriopoulos AP, et al. A system of integrated care for older persons with disabilities in Canada: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006;61(4):367-73.
13. Bergman H. The Canadian Initiative on Frailty and Aging. Aging Clin Exp Res 2003;15(3 Suppl):1-2.
14. Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S, Fried LP, Cutler GB Jr, Walston JD, et al. Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report. [Review] [70] refs. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:625-34.
15. Studenski S,HayesRP, LeibowitzRQ, BodeR, Lavery L,Walston J, et al. Clinical global impression of change in physical frailty: development of ameasure based on clinical judgment. JAmGeriatr Soc 2004;52:1560-6.
16. Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc 1983;31:721-7.
17. Sourial N, Wolfson C, Zhu B, Quail J, Fletcher J, Karunananthan S, et al. Correspondence analysis is a useful tool to uncover the relationships among categorical variables. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:647-54 [in this issue].
18. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: J. Wiley & Sons; 1987.
19. Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, van Hoewyk J, Solenberger P. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Surv Methodol 2001;27: 85-95.
20. Buchman AS, Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Tang Y, Bennett DA. Frailty is associated with incident Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline in the elderly. Psychosom Med 2007;69(5):483-9.
21. Verbrugge LM. Flies without wings. In: Carey J, Robine JM, Michel JP, Christen Y, editors. Longevity and frailty. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag; 2005. p. 67-81.
22. Bakker BFM. A new measure of social status for men and women: the social distance scale. Neth J Soc Sci 1993;29:113-29.
23. Burton ML, Greenberger E, Hayward C. Mapping the ethnic landscape: personal beliefs about own group's and other groups' traits. Cross Cult Res 2005;39:351-79.
24. van der Heijden PGM, de Leeuw J. Correspondence analysis used complementary to loglinear analysis. Psychometrika 1985;50:429-47.
25. Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C. Interpretation of epidemiological data using multiple correspondence analysis and log-linear models. J Data Sci 2004;2:75-86.