|
Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 447-448
|
How should we classify intersex disorders?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANDROGEN;
PROGESTERONE;
ANDROGEN INSENSITIVITY SYNDROME;
ANEUPLOIDY;
BIFID SCROTUM;
BIOPSY TECHNIQUE;
CARCINOMA IN SITU;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CLOACA;
CONGENITAL ADRENAL HYPERPLASIA;
CONSENSUS;
CRYPTORCHISM;
DECISION MAKING;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
DISEASE CLASSIFICATION;
DISORDERS OF SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;
FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM;
FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION;
GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION;
HERMAPHRODITISM;
HISTOLOGY;
HUMAN;
HYPOSPADIAS;
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
KARYOTYPE;
LAPAROSCOPY;
MICROPENIS;
NOMENCLATURE;
OVOTESTICULAR DISORDER OF SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROGESTERONE BLOOD LEVEL;
PSEUDOHERMAPHRODITISM;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;
SCROTUM DISORDER;
SEX CHROMOSOME;
SEX DETERMINATION;
SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;
SHORT SURVEY;
STEROID 21 MONOOXYGENASE DEFICIENCY;
X CHROMOSOME;
|
EID: 77956619518
PISSN: 14775131
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.04.005 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (6)
|