Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output

Scientometrics

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 839-857

  Zhou, Ping ^a,b   Thijs, Bart ^a   Glänzel, Wolfgang ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION OF CHINA   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956617550     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-2255-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. BRAUN, T., GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (1985), Scientometric Indicators. A 32 Country Comparison of Publication Productivity and Citation Impact. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore - Philadelphia 1985.
2. FRAME, J. D. (1977), Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean, Interciencia, 2: 143-148.
3. FRIETSCH, R., TANG, L., HINZE, S. (2007), Bibliometric data study: Assessing the current ranking of the People's Republic of China in a set of research fields. Report to the European Commission. Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe (Germany).
4. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHUBERT, A. (2003), A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for bibliometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56: 357-367.
5. GLÄNZEL, W., LETA, J., THIJS, B. (2006), Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics, 67 (1): 67-86.
6. GLÄNZEL, W., SCHLEMMER, B. (2007), National Research Profiles in the Changing Europe (1983-2003). An exploratory study on sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix, Scientometrics, 70 (2): 267-275.
7. GLÄNZEL, W., DEBACKERE, K., MEYER, M. (2008), 'Triad' or 'Tetrad'? On global changes in a dynamic world, Scientometrics, 74 (1): 59-76.
8. GLÄNZEL, W., THIJS, B., SCHUBERT, A., DEBACKERE, K. (2009), Subfield-specific normalised relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance, Scientometrics, 78 (1): 165-188.
9. LEYDESDORFF, L., WAGNER, C. (2007), Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system, D. TORRES-SALINAS & H. MOED (Eds), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vol. 1, CSIC, Madrid, 21-25 June 2007, pp. 499-507.
10. MOED, H. F., DE BRUIN, R. E., VAN LEEUWEN, TH. N. (1995), New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicatiors and first applications. Scientometrics, 33: 381-442.
11. MOST (2007), R&D Expenditure. Available at: http://www.sts.org.cn/sjkl/kjtjdt/data2007/2007-1.htmNSF, Asia's Rising Science and Technology Strength, Comparative Indicators for Asia, the European Union, and the United States.
12. REIST-2 (1997), The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1997. EUR 17639. European Commission, Brussels.
13. SCHUBERT, A., GLÄNZEL, W., BRAUN, T. (1989), World flash on basic research: Scientometric datafiles. A Comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields, 1981-1985, Scientometrics, 16 (1-6): 3-478.
14. ZHOU, P., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2006), The emergence of China as a leading nation in science, Research Policy, 35 (1): 83-104.
15. ZHOU, P., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2008), China ranks second in scientific publications since 2006, Chinese Science Bulletin, forthcoming.