Structural equation model with PLS path modeling for an integrated system of publicly funded basic research

Scientometrics

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 683-698

  Guan, Jiancheng ^a   Ma, Nan ^b  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956616135     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-2058-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ADAMS, J. D. (1990), Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (4): 673-702.
2. ADAMS, J. D. (1996), Measuring science: An exploration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93: 2664-2670.
3. AGHION, P., HOWITT, P. (1992), A model of growth through creative destruction, Econometrica, 60 (2): 323-351.
4. ALLISON, P. D., STEWART, J. A. (1974), Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage, American Sociological Review, 39: 596-606.
5. ALLISON, P. D., LONG, J. S., KRAUZ, T. K. (1982), Cumulative advantage and inequality in science, American Sociological Review, 47 (5): 615-625.
6. AMATO, S., ESPOSITO, V.V., TENENHAUS, M., A Global Goodness-of-Fit Index for PLS Structural Equation Modeling. Oral Communication to PLS Club, HEC School of Management, France, March 24, 2004.
7. BOLLEN, K. A., Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
8. BONITZ, M., BRUCKNER, E., SCHARNHORST, A. (1997), Characteristics and impact of the Matthew effect for countries, Scientometrics, 40 (3): 407-422.
9. CHUBIN, D. E., HACKETT, E. J., Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1990.
10. CHAVES, C.V., MORO, S. (2007), Investigating the interaction and mutual dependence between science and technology, Research Policy, 36 (8): 1204-1220.
11. COLE, J. R., COLE, S., Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
12. Commission of the European Communities. (2005), European Innovation Scoreboard 2005.
13. COZZENS, S. E., Literature-based Data in Research Evaluation: A Manager's Guide to Bibliometrics. eport to the National Science Foundation, Washington, DC., 1989.
14. COZZENS, S. E. (1997), The knowledge pool: Measurement challenges in evaluating fundamental research programs, Evaluation and Program Planning, 20 (1): 77-89.
15. DAVID, P., MOWERY, D., STEINMULLER, W. (1992), Analyzing the economic payoffs from basic research, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2 (1): 73-90.
16. DUNN, S. C., SERKER, R. F., WALLER, M. A. (1994), Latent variables in business logistics research: Scale development and validation, Journal of Business Logistics, 15 (2): 145-172.
17. ELKANA, Y., LEDERBERG, J., MERTON, R. K., THACKRAY, A., ZUCKERMAN, H., Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators, New York: Wiley, 1978.
18. EVENSON, R. E., KISLEV, Y. (1975), Agricultural research and productivity, Journal of Economic Literature, 14 (4): 1342-1343.
19. FORNELL, C. R., LARCKER, D. F. (1981), Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39-50.
20. GARVER, M. S., MENTZER, J. T. (1999), Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity, Journal of Business Logistics, 20 (1): 33-58.
21. GERBING, D. W., ANDERSON, J. C. (1988), An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment, Journal of Marketing Research, 25: 186-192.
22. GRILICHES, Z. (1964), Research expenditures, education and the aggregate agricultural production function, American Economic Review, 54 (6): 961-974.
23. GRILICHES, Z., R&D and Productivity, In: PAUL STONEMAN (ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
24. GUELLEC, D., VAN POTTELSBERGHE DE LA POTTERIE, B. (2004), From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66 (3): 353-378.
25. HAGSTROM, W. O. (1971), Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments, Sociology of Education, 44: 375-397.
26. HAIR, J., ANDERSON, R., TATHAM, R., BLACK, W., Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.), New York: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
27. HUFFMAN, W. E., EVENSON, R. E., Science for Agriculture, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1994.
28. IMD (2000-2004), IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook. Lausanne: IMD.
29. INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT (IBRD), World Development Indicators, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.
30. JÖRESKOG, K. G. (1970), A general method for analysis of covariance structure, Biometrika, 57: 239-251.
31. KEITH, B., BABCHUK, N. (1998), The quest for institutional recognition: a longitudinal analysis of scholarly productivity and academic prestige among sociology departments, Social Forces, 76 (4): 1495-1533.
32. KOUFTEROS, X. A. (1999), Testing a model of pull production: A paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modelling, Journal of Operations Management, 17: 467-488.
33. LONG, S., Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Preface to LISREL. London: Sage Publications, 1983.
34. LUCAS, R. E. (1988), On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3-42.
35. MARTIN, B. R. (1996), The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research, Scientometrics, 36 (3): 343-362.
36. MARTIN, B. R., SKEA, J. E. F., Academic Research Performance Indicators: An Assessment of the Possibilities. Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit, 1992.
37. MANSFIELD, E. (1980), Basic Research and Productivity Increase in manufacturing, American Economic Review, 70 (5): 863-873.
38. MANSFIELD, E. (1991), Academic research and industrial innovation, Research Policy, 20: 1-20.
39. MANSFIELD, E. (1992), Academic research and industrial innovation: A further note, Research Policy, 21: 295-296.
40. MERTON, R. K. (1968), The Matthew effect in science, Science, 159 (3810): 56-63.
41. MERTON, R. K. (1988), The Matthew effect II, ISIS, 79: 606-623.
42. NARIN, F., Evaluative Bibliometrics: The Use of Publication and Citation Analysis in the Evaluation of Scientific Activity. Cherry Hill, NJ: Computer Horizons, 1976.
43. NARIN, F., OLIVASTRO, D., STEVENS, K. (1994), Bibliometrics theory, practice and problems, Evaluation Review, 18 (l): 65-76.
44. OECD, 2005. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Integrating Technological Innovation Data, OSLO Manual (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris).
45. PHILLIMORE, A. J. (1989), University research performance indicators in practice: The University Grants Committee's evaluation of British universities, Research Policy, 18: 255-271.
46. VAN RAAN, A. F. J., Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1988.
47. VAN RAAN, A. F. J., Advanced Bibliometric Methods to Assess Research Performance and Scientific Development: Basic Principles and Recent Practical Applications. University of Leiden report, CWTS- 93-05, 1993.
48. RINGLE, C., WENDE, S., WILL, A., SmartPLS. University of Hamburg, Hamburg (http: //www.smartpls.de), 2005.
49. ROMER, P. M. (1990), Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 71-102.
50. SOHN, S. Y., JOO, Y. G., HAN, H. K. (2007), Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria, Evaluation and Program Planning, 30: 10-20.
51. TENENHAUS, M., VINZIA, V. E., CHATELIN, Y. M., LAURO, C. (2005), PLS path modelling, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48: 159-205.
52. VIRGO, J. A. (1977), A statistical procedure for evaluating the importance of scientific papers, The Library Quarterly, 47 (4): 415-430.
53. WOLD, H., Soft modelling: the basic design and some extensions, In: JÖRESKOG, K. G., WOLD, H. (Eds), System under Indirect Observation. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1982.
54. WOLD, H., Partial least squares, In: KOTZ, S., JOHNSON, N. L. (Eds), Encyclopaedia of Statistical Sciences, New York: Wiley, 1985.
55. YANG, T. L., CHUNG, H. S. (1996), An international comparative study of basic scientific research capacity: OECD Countries, Taiwan and Korea, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 52: 75-94.
56. YOON, Y. S., GURSOY, D., CHEN, J. S. (2001), Validating a tourism development theory with structural equation modelling, Tourism Management, 22: 363-372.