Semantic user profiling techniques for personalised multimedia recommendation

Multimedia Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 4-5, 2010, Pages 255-274

  Hopfgartner, Frank ^a   Jose, Joemon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Long term user profiling; Multimedia recommendation; Semantic web technologies; User simulation; Video annotation

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; MULTIMEDIA RECOMMENDATION; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES; USER PROFILING; USER SIMULATION; VIDEO ANNOTATIONS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 77956614850     PISSN: 09424962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00530-010-0189-6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Spink, A., Greisdorf, H., Bateman, J.: From highly relevant to not relevant: examining different regions of relevance. Inf. Process. Manage. 34(5), 599-621 (1998) (Pubitemid 128410409)
2. Nichols, D. M.: Implicit rating and filtering. In: Proceedings of 5th DELOS Workshop on Filtering and Collaborative Filtering, pp 31-36, ERCIM (1998)
3. Campbell, I., van Rijsbergen, C. J.: The ostensive model of developing information needs. In: Proceedings of the Conference Library Science, pp 251-268 (1996)
4. Smeaton, A. F., Over, P., Kraaij, W.: Evaluation campaigns and TRECVid. In: Proceedings of MIR' 2006, pp 321-330 (2006)
5. Smeaton, A. F., Wilkins, P., Worring, M., de Rooij, O., Chua, T. S., Luan, H.: Content-based video retrieval: three example systems from TRECVid. Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol. 18(2-3), 195-201 (2008)
6. Chen, L., Sycara, K.: WebMate: a personal agent for browsing and searching. In: Proceedings of the Autonomous Agents, pp 132-139. New York (1998)
7. Hancock-Beaulieu, M., Walker, S.: An evaluation of automatic query expansion in an online library catalogue. J. Documentation 48(4), 406-421 (1992)
8. Bharat, K., Kamba, T., Albers, M.: Personalized, interactive news on the Web. Multimedia Syst. 6(5), 349-358 (1998)
9. Luo, H., Fan, J., Keim, D. A., Satoh, S.: Personalized news video recommendation. In: Proceedings of MMM'09, pp 459-471 (2009)
10. Gruber, T. R.: Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 43(5-6), 907-928 (1995)
11. Fernández, N., Blazquez, J. M., Fisteus, J. A., Sanchez, L., Sintek, M., Bernardi, A., Fuentes, M., Marrara, A., Ben-Ahser, Z.: News: bringing semantic web technologies into news agencies. In: Proceedings of the Semantic Web Conference, pp 778-791 (2006)
12. Jokela, S., Sulonen, R., Turpeinen, M.: Agents in delivering personalized content based on semantic metadata. In: Proceedings of Intelligent Agents in Cyberspace, pp 84-93 (1999)
13. Gauch, S., Chaffee, J., Pretschner, A.: Ontology-based personalized search and browsing. Web Intell. Agent Syst. 1(3-4), 219-234 (2003)
14. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J., Niemi, T.: ExpansionTool: conceptbased query expansion and construction. Inf. Retr. 4(3), 231-251 (2001)
15. Bhogal, J., Macfarlane, A., Smith, P.: A review of ontology based query expansion. Inf. Process. Manage. 43(2007), 866-886 (2007)
16. Bürger, T., Gams, E., Güntner, G.: Smart content factory: assisting search for digital objects by generic linking concepts to multimedia content. In: Proceedings of HT, pp 286-287 (2005)
17. Dudev, M., Elbassuoni, S., Luxenburger, J., Ramanath, M., Weikum, G.: Personalizing the search for knowledge. In: Proceedings of PersDB, 08 (2008)
18. Holzinger, A.: Usability engineering for software developers. In: Communications of the ACM, vol. 48, no. 1, pp 71-74 (2005)
19. Kelly, D., Dumais, S. T., Pederson, J. O.: Evaluation challenges and directions for information-seeking support systems. IEEE Comput. 42(3), 60-66 (2009)
20. Vorhees, E. On test collections for adaptive information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 44 (6) (2008)
21. Spärck-Jones, K., Willett, P.: Evaluation. In: Readings in Information Retrieval, chap. 4, pp 67-74. Morgan Kaufmann (1997)
22. Finin, T. W.: GUMS: a general user modelling shell. In: User Models in Dialog Systems, pp 41-430 (1989)
23. Ivory, M., Hearst, M.: The state of art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 33(4), 470-516 (2001)
24. Hopfgartner, F., Jose, J. M.: On user modelling for personalised news video recommendation. In: Proceedings of UMAP'09, pp 403-408 (2009)
25. Hopfgartner, F., Jose, J. M.: Semantic user modelling for personal news video retrieval. In: Proceedings in MMM'10, pp 336-346, Springer (2010)
26. O'Connor, N., Czirjek, C., Deasy, S., Marlow, S., Murphy, N., Smeaton, A.: News story segmentation in the Físchlár video indexing system. In: Proceedings of CIP (2001)
27. Misra, H., Hopfgartner, F., Goyal, A., Punitha, P., Jose, J. M.: TV news story segmentation based on semantic coherence and content similarity. In: Proceedings of MMM'10, pp 347-357. Springer, Chongqing, China (2005)
28. Campbell, I., van Rijsbergen, C. J.: The ostensive model for developing information needs. In: Proceedings of CCLS, pp 251-268 (1996)
29. Bagga, A., Baldwin, B.: Entity-based cross-document coreferencing using the vector space model. In: Proceedings of Computational Linguistics, pp 79-85 (1998)
30. Robertson, S., Zaragoza, H., Taylor, M.: Simple BM25 extension to multiple weighted fields. In: Proceedings of CIKM'04, pp 42-49 (2004)
31. Choicestream: Personalization Survey. Technical report, Choicestream Inc. (2007)
32. Lioma, C., Ounis, I.: Examing the content load of part of speech blocks for information retrieval. In: ACL'06, pp 531-538 (2006)
33. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Beale, R.: Analysis of user behaviour as time series. In: Proceedings of HCI, pp 429-444 (1993)
34. Hopfgartner, F., Jose, J. M.: Evaluating the implicit feedback models for adaptive video retrieval. In: Proceedings of MIR'07, pp 323-331 (2007)
35. Bezold, M.: Describing user interactions in adaptive interactive systems. In: Proceedings of UMAP'09, pp 150-161 (2009)
36. Vallet, D., Hopfgartner, F., Jose, J. M.: Use of implicit graph for recommending relevant videos: a simulated evaluation. In: Proceedings of ECIR'08, pp 199-210 (2008)
37. Borlund, P.: The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Inf. Res. 8 (3) (2003)
38. Wilcoxon, F.: Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics 1, 80-83 (1945)