Comparative functional structure of the olfactory mucosa in the domestic dog and sheep

Annals of Anatomy

Volumn 192, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 329-337

  Kavoi, Boniface ^a   Makanya, Andrew ^a   Hassanali, Jameela ^a   Carlsson, Hans Erik ^b   Kiama, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI   (Kenya)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dog; Functional; Olfactory mucosa; Sheep; Structure

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BASAL CELL; CELL DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; DOMESTIC ANIMAL; ETHMOID BONE; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; LAMINA PROPRIA; NERVE FIBER; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHEEP; SMELLING; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SUCKLING; TURBINATE; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; EUKARYOTIC FLAGELLUM; INNERVATION; MOUSE; ODOR; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; AXONS; CILIA; DOGS; MICE; OLFACTORY MUCOSA; SHEEP; SMELL;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 77956613862     PISSN: 09409602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams D.R., Hotchkiss D.K. The canine nasal mucosa. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 1983, 12:109-125.
2. Anholt R.R. Molecular neurobiology of olfaction. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 1993, 7:1-22.
3. Bannister L.H., Dodson H.C. Endocrine pathways in the olfactory and vomeronasal epithelium of the mouse: ultrastructure and uptake of tracers. Microsc. Electron. Biol. Celular (Mendoza) 1992, 23:128-141.
4. Bradshaw J.W.S. Behavioral biology. The Waltham of Dog and Cat Behavior 1992, 31-52. Pergamon Press, Oxford. C. Thorne (Ed.).
5. Breipohl W., Naguro T., Walker D.G. The postnatal development of Masera's organ in the rat. Chem. Senses 1989, 14:649-662.
6. Buck.L., Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 1991, 65:175-187.
7. Burkitt H.G., Young B., Heath J.W. Wheater's Functional Histology: A Textbook and Color Atlas 1993, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. third ed.
8. Crew L., Hunter D. Neurogenesis in the olfactory epithelium. Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 1994, 2:151-161.
9. Ferreira G., Terrazas A., Poindron P., Nowak R., Orgeur P., Lévy F. Learning of olfactory cues is not necessary for early lamb recognition by the mother. Physiol. Behav. 2000, 69:405-412.
10. Field P.M., Li.Y., Raisman G. Ensheathment of the olfactory nerves in the rat. J. Neurocytol. 2003, 32:317-324.
11. Gelez H., Fabre-Nys C. The male effect in sheep and goat: a review of the respective roles of the olfactory systems. Horm. Behav. 2004, 46:257-271.
12. Getchell M.L., Mellert T.K. Olfactory mucus secretion. Smell and Taste in Health and Disease. 1991, 83-95. Raven Press, New York. T.V. Getchell, R. Doty, L. Bartoshuk, J.B. Snow (Eds.).
13. Gittleman T.L. Carnivore Behaviour, Ecology and Evolution 1989, Chapman and Hall Ltd., London.
14. Gundersen H.J.G. Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect. J. Microsc. 1977, 143:3-45.
15. Hafez E.S.E. The Behavior of Domestic Animals 1962, Bailliere Tindall and Cox Ltd., London.
16. Hart B.L., Haugen C.M. Scent marking and sexual behavior maintained in anosmic male dog. Community Behav. Biol. 1971, 6:131-135.
17. Heistad D.D., Marcus M.L., Larsen G.E., Armstrong M.L. Role of vasa vasorum in nourishment of the aortic wall. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 1981, 240:781-787.
18. Herrera L.P., Casas C.E., Bates M.L., Guest J.D. Ultrastructural study of the primary olfactory pathway in Macaca fascicularis. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 488:427-441.
19. Houpt K.A., Davis P.P., Hintz H.F. Effect of peripheral anosmia in dogs trained as flavor validators. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1982, 43:841-843.
20. Janneke C.A., Pieter-Jaap K., Kees J., Herman van D. Effect of bone decalcification procedures on DNA in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization: EDTA is highly preferable to a routinely used acid decalcifier. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1999, 47:703-710.
21. Kajino H., Goldbarg S., Roman C., Liu B.M., Mauray F., Chen Y.Q., Takahashi Y., Koch C.J., Clyman R.I. Vasa vasorum hypoperfusion is responsible for medial hypoxia and anatomic remodeling in the newborn lamb ductus arteriosus. Pediatr. Res. 2002, 51:228-235.
22. Kajiura S.M., Forni J.B., Summers A.P. Olfactory morphology of carcharhinid and sphyrnid sharks: does the cephalofoil confer a sensory advantage?. J. Morphol. 2005, 264:253-263.
23. Karlsson L.M., Gokhale A.M. Stereological estimation of mean linear intercept length using the vertical sections and trisector methods. J. Microsc. 1997, 186:143-152.
24. Kiama S.G., Bhattacharjee J., Maina J.N., Weyrauch K.D. A scanning electron microscope study of the pectin oculi of the black kite (Milvus migrans): possible involvement of melanosomes in protecting the pecten against damage by ultraviolet light. J. Anat. 1994, 185:637-642.
25. Kumar P., Kumar S., Singh Y. Histology of nasal turbinates in dog. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 64:1050-1053.
26. Kumar P., Kumar S., Singh Y. Scanning electron-microscopic studies on the nasal cavity of goat. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 69:887-890.
27. Kumar P., Timoney J.F., Southgate H.P., Sheoran A.S. Light and scanning microscopic studies of the nasal turbinates of the horse. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2000, 29:103-109.
28. Ladewig P. Uber eine eine einfache und Vielseitige Bindegewebs Farbung (Modification der Mallory-Heidenhainschen methode). Z. Mikroskop. Technik. 1938, 55:215-217.
29. Lenz H. Surface of the olfactory region in man observed by scanning electron microscope. Acta Otolaryngol. 1977, 84:145-154.
30. Levy F., Keller M., Poindron P. Olfactory regulation of maternal behavior in mammals. Horm. Behav. 2004, 46:284-302.
31. Makanya A.N., Tschanz S.A., Haenni B., Burri P.H. Functional respiratory morphology in the newborn quokka wallaby (Setonix brachyurus). J. Anat. 2007, 211:226-236.
32. Marshall D.A., Blumer L., Moulton D.G. Odor detection curves for n-pentanoic acid in dogs and humans. Chem. Senses 1981, 6:445-453.
33. Meisami E. A proposed relationship between increase in the number of olfactory neurons, convergence ratio and sensitivity in the developing rat. Dev. Brain Res. 1989, 46:9-19.
34. Menco B.P.M. Bovine olfactory and nasal respiratory epithelium surfaces: High voltage and scanning electron microscopy, and cryo-ultramicrotomy. Cell Tissue Res. 1978, 193:503-524.
35. Mendoza A.S. Morphological studies on the rodent main and accessory olfactory systems; the regio olfactoria and vomeronasal organ. Ann. Anat. 1993, 175:425-446.
36. Moran D.T., Rowley J.C., Jafek B.W. Electron microscopy of the human epithelium reviews a new cell type: the microvillar cell. Brain Res. 1982, 253:39-46.
37. Nomura T., Takahashi S., Ushiki T. Cytoarchitecture of the normal rat olfactory epithelium: light and scanning electron microscopic studies. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 2004, 67:159-170.
38. Pihlström H., Fortelius M., Hemilä S., Forsman R., Reuter T. Scaling of mammalian ethmoid bones can predict olfactory organ size and performance. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2005, 272:957-962.
39. Raimund A., Dieter R., Burton M.S. Ontogenetic changes in odor sensitivity, olfactory receptor area and olfactory receptor density in the rat. Chem. Senses 1991, 16:209-218.
40. Schluessel V., Bennett M.B., Bleckmann H., Blomberg S., Collin S.P. Morphometric and ultrastructural comparison of the olfactory system in elasmobranchs: the significance of structure-function relationships based on phylogeny and ecology. J. Morphol. 2008, 269:1365-1386.
41. Schluessel V., Bennett M.B., Bleckmann H., Collin S.P. The role of olfaction throughout juvenile development: Functional adaptations in elasmobranchs. J. Morphol. 2010, 271:451-461.
42. Shillito-Walser E.E., Alexander G. Mutual recognition between ewes and lambs. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1980, 20:807-816.
43. Snyder D.A., Rivers A.M., Yokoe H., Menco B.P.M., Anholt R.R.H. Olfactomedin: purification, characterization, and localiation of a novel olfactory glycoprotein. Biochemistry 1991, 30:9143-9153.
44. Stuelpnagel J.T., Reiss J.O. Olfactory metamorphosis in the coastal giant salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus). J. Morphol. 2005, 266:22-45.
45. Suzuki Y., Takeda M., Farbman A.I. Supporting cells as phagocytes in the olfactory epithelium after bulbectomy. J. Comp. Neurol. 1996, 376:509-517.
46. Terrazas A., Ferreira G., Leóvy F., Nowak R., Serafin N. Do ewes recognize their lambs within the first day postpartum without the help of olfactory cues?. Behav. Proc. 1999, 47:19-29.
47. Van Drongelen W., Holley A., Doving K.B. Convergence in the olfactory system: quantitative aspects of odor sensitivity. J. Theor. Biol. 1978, 71:39-48.
48. Walker E.P. Mammals of the World 1975, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London. third ed.
49. Weibel E.R., Taylor C.R., Hoppeler H. The concept of symmorphosis: a testable hypothesis of structure-function relationship. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 88:10357-10361.