Creation of journal-based publication profiles of scientific institutions - a methodology for the interdisciplinary comparison of scientific research based on the J-factor

Scientometrics

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 381-392

  Ball, Rafael ^a   Mittermaier, Bernhard ^a   Tunger, Dirk ^a  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956610767     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-2120-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ADAM, D. (2002), The counting house, Nature, 415 (6873): 726-729.
2. BROAD, W. (2004). U.S. is losing its dominance in the Sciences. The New York Times, 1: (03.05.2004).
3. DA POZZO, F., I. MAYE, A. ROULIN PERRIARD, M. VON INS (2001), Die Schweiz und die weltweite Champions League der Forschungsinstitutionen 1994-1999 - Ein Beitrag zu einem internationalen Benchmarking: Konzept und erste Ergebnisse. Retrieved 30.08.2007, from http://www.cest.ch/Publikationen/2001/cest_11/CEST_2001_11.pdf.
4. GARFIELD, E. (1989), Evaluating research: Do bibliometric indicators provide the best measures? Essays of an Information Scientist, 12: 93-100.
5. GARG, K. C., S. KUMAR, K. LAL (2006), Scientometric profile of Indian agricultural research as seen through science citation index expanded, Scientometrics, 68 (1): 151-166.
6. GLÄNZEL, W. (2008), Seven Myths in Bibliometrics. About facts and fiction in quantitative science studies. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2 (1): 9-17.
7. GLÄNZEL, W., A. SCHUBERT, H.-J. CZERWON (1999), An item-by-item subject classifivation of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis, Scientometrics, 44 (3): 427-439.
8. MERVIS, J. (2007), U.S. output flattens, and NSF wonders why - Scientific publishing, Science, 317 (5838): 582.
9. MITTERMAIER, B., D. TUNGER, U. BURKARD, S. RAMOWSKY, H. LEXIS (2007), Bibliometric Analysis on the Scientific Output of India. Retrieved 04.09.2007, from http://www.bibliometrie.de /Bibliometric_report_dlr_India_E_mit_Deckblatt_1971.pdf.
10. PRICE, D. J. D. S., Little Science, Big Science, New York, Columbia University Press, 1963.
11. SCHUBERT, A., T. BRAUN (1986), Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assesment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9 (5-6): 281-291.
12. SCHUBERT, A., T. BRAUN (1993), Reference-standards for citation based assesments, Scientometrics, 26 (1): 21-35.
13. TIJSSEN, R., T. VAN LEEUWEN, A. VAN RAAN, Mapping the Scientific Performance of German Medical Research. Stuttgart, Schattauer Verlag, 2002.
14. VAN RAAN, A., Measuring Science. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research.
15. H. F. MOED, W. GLÄNZEL, U. SCHMOCH, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 19-50, 2004.
16. VINKLER, P. (1996), Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators, Scientometrics, 36 (2): 223-236.
17. WAGNER-DöBLER, R. (2005), The system of research and development indicators: entry-points for information agents, Scientometrics, 62 (1): 145-153.
18. ZITT, M., S. RAMANANA-RAHARY, E. BASSECOULARD (2005), Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation, Scientometrics, 63 (2): 373-401.