Differential effects of self-efficacy and perceived control on intention to perform skin cancer-related health behaviours

Health Education Research

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 769-779

  Pertl, M ^a,b   Hevey, D ^a   Thomas, K ^a   Craig, A ^b   Ni Chuinneagain S ^b   Maher, L ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SKIN TUMOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SKIN NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956603626     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyq031     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. National Cancer Institute. State Cancer Profiles Website, National Institutes of Health, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. 2008. Available at: http://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov/ historicaltrend /joinpoint.withimage.php? 0&9900&999&7599&001&053& 00&0&0&0&2& 0&1&1#graph. Accessed: 19 December 2008.
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australasian Association of Cancer Registries. Cancer in Australia: And Overview, Cancer. Series No. 37. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2007. Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/can/ca06/ca06-c00.pdf. Accessed: 19 December 2008.
3. Cancer Research UK. CancerStats-Incidence UK. 2008. Available at: http://publications.cancerresearchuk.org/WebRoot/crukstoredb/CRUK-PDFs/CSINC08. pdf. Accessed: 19 December 2008.
4. Irish Cancer Society. Press Release: People Living in Ireland Ignore Risk of Developing Skin Cancer as Incidence Continues to Grow. Dublin: SunSmart Barometer Research, 2005. Available at: http://www.cancer.ie/sunsmart/ pressrelease-may05.php. Accessed: 9 July 2008.
5. Armstrong BK, Kricker A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2001; 63: 8-18.
6. Kricker A, Armstrong BK, Goumas C et al. Ambient UV, personal sun exposure and risk of multiple primary melanomas. Cancer Causes Control 2007; 18: 295-304.
7. Ramos J, Villa J, Ruiz A et al. UV dose determines key characteristics of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004; 13: 2006-11.
8. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179-211.
9. Jackson KM, Aiken LS. A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: the impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection. Health Psychol 2000; 19: 469-78.
10. Hillhouse JJ, Adler CM, Drinnon J et al. Application of Ajzen?s theory of planned behavior to predict sunbathing, tanning salon use, and sunscreen use intentions and behaviors. J Behav Med 1997; 20: 365-78.
11. Hillhouse JJ, Turrisi R, Kastner M. Modeling tanning salon behavioral tendencies using appearance motivation, selfmonitoring and the theory of planned behavior. Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 405-14.
12. Branstrom R, Ullen H, Brandberg Y. Attitudes, subjective norms and perception of behavioural control as predictors of sun-related behaviour in Swedish adults. Prev Med 2004; 39: 992-9.
13. Jones F, Abraham C, Harris P et al. From knowledge to action regulation: modeling the cognitive prerequisites of sun screen use in Australian and UK samples. Psychol Health 2001; 16: 191-206.
14. White KM, Robinson NG, Young RM et al. Testing an extended theory of planned behaviour to predict young people?s sun safety in a high risk area. Br J Health Psychol 2008; 13: 435-48.
15. Ajzen I, Madden TJ. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psychol 1986; 22: 453-74.
16. Kraft P, Rise J, Sutton S et al. Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: perceived behavioural control or affective attitude? Br J Soc Psychol 2005; 44: 479-96.
17. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Distinguishing perceptions of control from Self-efficacy: predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 1999; 29: 72-90.
18. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001; 40: 471-99.
19. Conner M, Armitage CJ. Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J Appl Soc Psychol 1998; 28: 1429-64.
20. Terry DJ, O?Leary JE. The theory of planned behaviour: the effects of perceived behavioural control and self-efficacy. Br J Soc Psychol 1995; 34: 199-220.
21. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 2002; 32: 665-83.
22. Ajzen I. Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. 2002. Available at: http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb. measurement.pdf. Accessed: 13 January 2008.
23. Trafimow D, Finlay KA, Sheeran P et al. Evidence that perceived behavioural control is a multidimensional construct: perceived control and perceived difficulty. Br J Soc Psychol 2002; 41: 101.
24. Myers LB, Horswill MS. Social cognitive predictors of sun protection intention and behavior. Behav Med 2006; 32: 57-63.
25. Luszczynska A, Haynes C. Changing nutrition, physical activity and body weight among student nurses and midwives: effects of a planning intervention and self-efficacy beliefs. J Health Psychol 2009; 14: 1075-84.
26. Anderson ES, Winett RA, Wojcik JR. Self-regulation, selfefficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Ann Behav Med 2007; 34: 304-12.
27. Kaneko N. Association between condom use and perceived barriers to and self-efficacy of safe sex among young women in Japan. Nurs Health Sci 2007; 9: 284-9.
28. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis N, Biddle SJ. The influence of self-efficacy and past behaviour on the physical activity intentions of young people. J Sports Sci 2001; 19: 711-25.
29. Cramp AG, Bray SR. A prospective examination of exercise and barrier self-efficacy to engage in leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy. Ann Behav Med 2009; 37: 325-34.
30. Luszczynska A, Tryburcy M, Schwarzer R. Improving fruit and vegetable consumption: a self-efficacy intervention compared with a combined self-efficacy and planning intervention. Health Educ Res 2007; 22: 630-8.
31. Ashford S, Edmunds J, French DP. What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol, in press.
32. Lee LL, Arthur A, Avis M. Using self-efficacy theory to develop interventions that help older people overcome psychological barriers to physical activity: a discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 1690-9.
33. Mausbach BT, Semple SJ, Strathdee SA et al. Efficacy of a behavioral intervention for increasing safer sex behaviors in HIV-negative, heterosexual methamphetamine users: results from the Fast-Lane Study. Ann Behav Med 2007; 34: 263-74.
34. Johnston M, Morrison V, Macwalter R et al. Perceived control, coping and recovery from disability following stroke. Psychol Health 1999; 14: 181-92.
35. Schröder C, Johnston M, Teunissen L et al. Perceived control is a concurrent predictor of activity limitations in patients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 63-9.
36. Bonetti D, Johnston M. Perceived control predicting the recovery of individual-specific walking behaviours following stroke: testing psychological models and constructs. Br J Health Psychol 2008; 13: 463-78.
37. Ray C, Jefferies S, Weir WR. Coping and other predictors of outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome: a 1-year follow-up. J Psychosom Res 1997; 43: 405-15.
38. Fisher K, Johnston M. Experimental manipulation of perceived control and its effect on disability. Psychol Health 1996; 11: 657-69.
39. Johnston M, Gilbert P, Partridge C et al. Changing perceived control in patients with physical disabilities: an intervention study with patients receiving rehabilitation. Br J Clin Psychol 1992; 31: 89-94.
40. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness-offit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980; 88: 588-600.
41. Jackson DL, Gillaspy JA, Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analyses: an overview and some recommendations. Psychol Methods 2009; 14: 6-23.
42. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6: 1-55.
43. Judd CM, McClelland GH, Ryan CS. Data Analysis. A Model Comparison Approach. Hove, UK: Routledge, 2009.
44. Parker D, Manstead ASR, Stradling SG et al. Intention to commit driving violations: an application of the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Psychol 1992; 77: 94-101.
45. Norman P, Armitage CJ, Quigley C. The theory of planned behavior and binge drinking: assessing the impact of binge drinker prototypes. Addict Behav 2007; 32: 1753-68.
46. Norman P, Bennett P, Lewis H. Understanding binge drinking among young people: an application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Health Educ Res 1998; 13: 163-9.
47. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, 1986.
48. Gritz ER, Tripp MK, James AS et al. Effects of a preschool staff intervention on children?s sun protection: outcomes of sun protection is fun! Health Educ Behav 2007; 34: 562-77.
49. Livingston PM, White V, Hayman J et al. Australian adolescents? sun protection behavior: who are we kidding? Prev Med 2007; 44: 508-12.
50. Palmer RF, Graham JW, White EL et al. Applying multilevel analytic strategies in adolescent substance use prevention research. Prev Med 1998; 27: 328-36.
51. Shope JT, Kloska DD, Dielman TE et al. Longitudinal evaluation of an enhanced alcohol misuse prevention study (AMPS) curriculum for grades six-eight. J Sch Health 1994; 64: 160-6.