Morphological and genetic evidence that Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 inhabits Amsterdam and Saint Paul Islands (southern Indian Ocean)

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 67, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1401-1407

  Guerra, Ángel ^a   Roura, Álvaro ^a   González, Ángel F ^a   Pascual, Santiago ^a   Cherel, Yves ^b   Pérez Losada, Marcos ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES MARINAS   (Spain)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c CENTRO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO EM BIODIVERSIDADE E RECURSOS GENÉTICOS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

biogeography; DNA sequences; Octopus vulgaris; southern Indian Ocean

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; CEPHALOPOD; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MERISTICS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS;

AMSTERDAM ISLAND; FRENCH SOUTHERN TERRITORIES; SAINT PAUL ISLAND [FRENCH SOUTHERN TERRITORIES];

ANIMALIA; OCTOPUS; OCTOPUS VULGARIS;

EID: 77956602230     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsq040     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximumlikelihood principle. In Second International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 267-281. Ed. by B. Petrov, and F. Csake. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
2. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39: 783-791.
3. Folmer, O., Balck, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., and Vrijenhoek, R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3: 294-299.
4. Guerra, A. 1975. Determinación de las diferentes fases del desarrollo sexual de Octopus vulgaris mediante un índice de madurez. Investigación Pesquera, Barcelona, 39: 397-416.
5. Guzik, M. T., Norman, M. D., and Crozier, R. H. 2005.Molecular phylogeny of the benthic shallow-water octopuses (Cephalopoda: Octopodinae). Molecular Phylogenetic Evolution, 37: 235-248.
6. Hanlon, R. T. 1988. Behavioral and body patterning characters useful in taxonomy and field identification of cephalopods. Malacologia, 29: 247-265.
7. Huffard, C. L., and Hochberg, F. G. 2005. Description of a new species of the genus Amphioctopus (Mollusca: Octopodidae) from the Hawaiian Islands. Molluscan Research, 25: 113-128.
8. Katoh, K., Kuma, K., Toh, H., and Miyata, T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Research, 33: 511-518.
9. Leite, T. S., Haimovici, M., Molina, W., and Warnke, K. 2008. Morphological and genetic description of Octopus insularis, a new cryptic species in the Octopus vulgaris complex (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) from the tropical southwestern Atlantic. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 74: 63-74.
10. Mangold, K. 1998. The Octopodinae from the eastern Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 586: 521-528.
11. Mangold, K., and Hochberg, F. G. 1991. Defining the genus Octopus: redescription of Octopus vulgaris. Bulletin of Marine Science, 49: 665.
12. Mather, J. A., and Mather, D. L. 1994. Skin colours and patterns of juvenile Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) in Bermuda. Vie et Milieu, 44: 267-272.
13. Mossel, E., and Roch, S. 2010. Incomplete lineage sorting: consistent phylogeny estimation from multiple loci. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational. Biology and Bioinformatics, 7: 166-171.
14. Norman, M. D. 1991. Octopus cyanea Gray, 1849 (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in Australian waters: description, distribution and taxonomy. Bulletin of Marine Science, 49: 20-28.
15. Norman, M. D. 2000. Cephalopods, a World Guide. Conch Books, Hackenheim, Germany. 318 pp.
16. Norman, M. D., and Hochberg, F. G. 2005. The current state of octopus taxonomy. Phuket Marine Biological Centre Research Bulletin, 66: 127-154.
17. Posada, D., and Crandall, K. A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818.
18. Robson, G. C. 1929. A Monograph of the Recent Cephalopoda. 1. Octopodinae. British Museum of Natural History, London. 236 pp.
19. Roper, C. F. E., and Voss, G. L. 1983. Guidelines for taxonomic descriptions of cephalopod species. Memoires of the National Museum of Victoria, 44: 49-63.
20. Söller, R., Warnke, K., Saint-Paul, U., and Blohm, D. 2000. Sequence divergence of mitochondrial DNA indicates cryptic biodiversity in Octopus vulgaris and supports the taxonomic distinctiveness of Octopus mimus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). Marine Biology, 136: 29-35.
21. Stranks, T. N. 1998. The systematic and nomenclatural status of the Octopodidae described from Australia (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 586: 529-547.
22. Takumiya, M., Kobayashi, M., Tsuneki, K., and Furuya, H. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships among major species of Japanese coleoid cephalopods (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) using three mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zoological Science, 22: 147-155.
23. Teske, P. R., Oosthuizen, A., Papadopoulos, I., and Barker, N. P. 2007. Phylogeographic structure of Octopus vulgaris in South Africa revisited: identification of a second lineage near Durban harbour. Marine Biology, 151: 2119-2122.
24. Toll, R. B. 1998. The systematic and nomenclatural status of the Octopodinae described from the Indian Ocean (excluding Australia) and the Red Sea. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 586: 475-487.
25. Voight, J. R. 1998. An overview of shallow-water octopus biogeography. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 586: 549-559.
26. Warnke, K., Söller, R., Blohm, D., and Saint-Paul, U. 2004. A new look at geographic and phylogenetic relationships within the species group surrounding Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca, Cephalopoda): indications of very wide distribution from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolution Research, 42: 306-312.
27. Zwickl, D. J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. www.bio.utexas.edu/faculty/antisense/garli/Garli.html.