From gain score t to ANCOVA F (and vice versa)

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Knapp, Thomas R ^a   Schafer, William D ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956581209     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Campbell, D.T., and Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N.L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally. [This classic chapter has been re-published as a separate paperback book several times over the years, and is often temporarily out of print.]
2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Cortina, J.M., & Nouri, H. (2000). Effect size for ANCOVA designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Elashoff, J.D. (1969). Analysis of covariance: A delicate instrument. American Educational Research Journal, 6 (3),383-401.
5. Hedges, L.V. (2007). Correcting a significance test for clustering. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32(2), 151-179.
6. Huck, S.W., & Mclean, R.A. (1975). Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design: A potentially confusing task. Psychological Bulletin, 82 (4), 511-518.
7. Johnson, P.O., & Fay, L.C. (1950). The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika, 15(4), 349-367.
8. Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57-93.
9. Kendall, M.G., & Gibbons, J.D. (1990). Rank correlation methods (5th ed.). London: Arnold, 1990.
10. Kirk, R.E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
11. Knapp, T.R. (1978). Canonical correlation analysis: A general parametric significance-testing system. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 410-416.
12. Locascio, J.J., & Cordray, D.S. (1983). A re-analysis of "Lord's Paradox". Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 115-126.
13. Lord, F.M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 68 (5), 304-305.
14. Rogosa, D. (1980). Comparing nonparallel regression lines. Psychological Bulletin, 88 (2), 307-321.
15. Rudner, L., Glass, G.V, Evartt, D.L., & Emery, P.J. (2002). A user's guide to the meta-analysis of research studies. College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
16. Schafer, W.D. (1981). Letter to the Editor. The American Statistician, 35 (3), 179.
17. Schochet, P.V. (2008). Statistical power for random assignment evaluations of educational programs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33 (1), 62-87.