Reply to: Austin et al. CytoJournal 2009;6:12 (Unfounded claims mar scientific critique)

CytoJournal

Volumn 6, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Jeronimo, Jose ^a   Barone, Mark ^b   Luciani, Silvana ^c   Lu, Ricky ^d   Sherris, Jacqueline ^a   Torod, Julie ^e   Tsu, Vivien ^a  

^a PATH   (United States)

^b ENGENDERHEALTH   (United States)

^c PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (United States)

^d JHPEIGO   (United States)

^e International Union Against Cancer UICC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; COST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LETTER; MISCONDUCT; NONHUMAN; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; WART VIRUS; CANCER PREVENTION; INDIA; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRECANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU;

EID: 77956581194     PISSN: 09745963     EISSN: 17426413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1742-6413.57780     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Austin RM, Zhao C. Test group biases and ethical concerns mar New England Journal of Medicine articles promoting HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. Cytojournal 2009;6:12.
2. Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, et al. HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer in Rural India. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1385-94.
3. Wright TC Jr, Blumenthal P, Bradley J, Denny L, Esmy PO, Jayant K, et al. Cervical cancer prevention for all the world′s women: New approaches offer opportunities and promise. Diagn Cytopathol 2007;35:845-8.
4. Sherris J, Wittet S, Kleine A, Sellors J, Luciani S, Sankaranarayanan R, et al. Evidence-based, alternative cervical cancer screening approaches in low-resource settings. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2009;35:147-54.