Material flow determination through agricultural machinery management;Determinação de fluxo de materiais por meio do gerenciamento de máquinas agrícolas

Scientia Agricola

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 375-383

  Romanelli, Thiago Libório ^a   Milan, Marcos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Environmental management; LCA; Material embodiment; Mechanization

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77956576831     PISSN: 01039016     EISSN: 1678992X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162010000400001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Society of Agricultural Engineers [ASAE]. 2003a. D497.4 Agricultural machinery management data. p. 373-380. In: ASAE. ASAE standards 2003. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA.
2. American Society of Agricultural Engineers [ASAE]. 2003b. D496.2 Agricultural machinery management data. p. 367-372. In: ASAE. ASAE standards 2003. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA.
3. Brandt-Williams, S. 2002. Emergy of Florida Agriculture: Handbook of Emergy Evaluation. Center of Environmental Policies, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
4. Brown, M.T. 2004. A picture is worth a thousand words: energy systems language and simulation. Ecological Modelling 178: 83-100.
5. Cavalett, O; Queiroz, J.F.; Ortega, E. 2006. Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains: pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil. Ecological Modelling 193: 205-224.
6. Chavanne, X.; Frangi, J.P. 2008. Energy yield for the production of ethanol from corn. Comptes Rendus Geoscience 340: 263-287. (in French, with abstract in English).
7. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento [CONAB]. 2006. Cost of agricultural production. Available at: http://www.conab.gov.br/conabweb/download/safra/custosproducaometodologi a.pdf. [Accessed Aug. 25, 2008]. (in Portuguese).
8. DeSimone, L.; Popoff, F. 1997. Eco-Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
9. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária [EMBRAPA]. 2009. Production systems. Available at: http://www.sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br/FontesHTML/Leite/LeiteZo nadaMataAtlantica/custos/cpsilagemilho.html. [Accessed Jul 27, 2009]. (in Portuguese).
10. Esty, D.C.; Chertow, M. 1997. Thinking ecologically: an introduction. p. 1-14. In: Chertow, M.; Esty, D.C., eds. Thinking ecologically: building the next generation of environmental policy. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.
11. European Fertilizer Manufacturers' Association [EFMA]. 2004. Understanding nitrogen and its use in agriculture. EFMA, Brussels, Belgium.
12. Halleux, H.; Lassaux, S.; Renzoni. R.; Germain, A. 2008. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of two Biofuels. ethanol from sugar beet and rapeseed methyl ester. International Journal of Life-Cycle Assessment 13: 184-90.
13. Jacovine, L.A.G.; Viana, W.D.; Alves, R.R.; Walter, M.K.C.; Silva, M.L.; Valverde, S.R. 2009. Environmental approach of companies within the pulp/paper, metallurgical and sugar/alcohol sectors. Scientia Agricola 66: 1-7.
14. Milan, M. 1998. Improving operational management of harvest, transport and mechanization for sugar cane. p. 108-116. In: American Society of Agricultural Engineers [ASAE]. Proceedings of the International Conference of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 7. ASAE, Orlando, FL, USA.
15. Molin, J.P.; Milan, M. 2002. Tractor-implement: designing, operational capacity and cost. p. 409-436. In: Gonçalves, J.L.M; Stape, J.L. Soil conservation and cultivation for planted forests. IPEF, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. (in Portuguese).
16. Maud, S.; Cevolatti, D. 2004. Realising the Enlightenment: H.T. Odum's energy systems language qua G.W.v Leibniz's characteristica universalis. Ecological Modelling 178: 279-292.
17. Pimentel, D.; Patzek, T.W. 2005. Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood: biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Natural Resources Research 14: 65-76.
18. Pimentel, D.; Hepperly, P.; Hanson, J.; Douds, D.; Seidel, R.,. 2005. Environmental, energetic and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55: 573-582.
19. Pizzigallo, A.C.I.; Granai, C.; Borsa, S. 2008. The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. Journal of Environmental Management 86: 396-406.
20. Romanelli, T.L.; Cohen, M.J.; Milan, M.; Brown, M.T. 2008. Emergy synthesis of intensive Eucalyptus cultivation in São Paulo, Brazil. Forest Science 54: 228-241.
21. Strieder, M.L.; Silva, P.R.F; Rambo, L.; Sangoi, L.; Silva, A.A.; Endrigo, P.C.; Jandrey, D.B. 2008. Crop management systems and maize grain yield under narrow row spacing. Scientia Agricola 65: 346-353.
22. Van Oost, K.; Quine, T.A.; Govers, G.; De Gryze, S.; Six, J.; Harden, J.W.; Ritchie, J. C.; McCarty, G.W.; Heckrath, G.; Kosmas, C.; Giraldez, J.V.; Marques Da Silva, J. R.; Merck, R. 2007. The impact of agricultural soil erosion on the global carbon cycle. Science 318: 626-629.
23. Wang, W.J.; Dalal, R.C. 2006. Carbon inventory for a cereal cropping system under contrasting tillage, nitrogen fertilization and stubble management practices. Soil and Tillage Research 91: 68-74.