Reporting of minority participation rates and racial differences in schizophrenia and psychophysiological research: Improving but still not adequate

Schizophrenia Research

Volumn 123, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 90-91

  Chakraborty, Beatrice H ^a,b   Steinhauer, Stuart R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; EXTERNAL VALIDITY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MINORITY GROUP; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RACE DIFFERENCE; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SCHIZOPHRENIA; UNITED STATES;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MINORITY GROUPS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RESEARCH; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SCHIZOPHRENIC PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956551255     PISSN: 09209964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.06.006     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Lewine R., Caudle J. At issue: race in the "decade of the brain.". Schizophr. Bull. 1999, 25(1):1-5.
2. Sue S. Science, ethnicity, and bias: where have we gone wrong?. Am. Psychol. 1999, 54(12):1070-1077.
3. NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research 1994, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
4. NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research-Amended October 2001 2001, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.