Solving demodulation as an optimization problem

IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2051-2066

  Sell, Gregory ^a   Slaney, Malcolm ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Index Terms Modulation; Optimization methods

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC SIGNALS; CONVEX PROGRAMMING; INDEX TERMS-MODULATION; OPTIMIZATION FRAMEWORK; OPTIMIZATION METHODS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS;

CONVEX OPTIMIZATION; COST FUNCTIONS; DEMODULATION; MODULATORS; OPTICAL VARIABLES MEASUREMENT;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77956538750     PISSN: 15587916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TASL.2010.2041108     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. L. Atlas and C. Janssen, "Coherent modulation spectral filtering for single-channel music source separation," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 2005, pp. 461-464.
2. L. Atlas, Q. Li, and J. Thompson, "Homomorphic modulation spectra," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 2004, pp. 761-764.
3. S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/ cvxbook
4. P. Clark and L. Atlas, "A sum-of-products model for effective coherence modulation filtering," in Proc. ICASSP, 2009.
5. P. Clark and L. Atlas, "Time-frequency coherent modulation filtering of nonstationary signals," IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 4323-4332, Nov. 2009.
6. M. Elihilali, T. Chi, and S.A. Shamma, "A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility," Speech Commun., vol. 41, pp. 331-348, 2003.
7. O. Ghitza, "On the upper cutoff frequency of the auditory critical-band envelope detectors in the context of speech perception," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 1628-1640, Sept. 2001.
8. M. Grant, S. Boyd, and Y. Ye, "cvx Users' Guide," Sep. 2008, available at [Online]. Available: http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/cvx
9. S. Greenberg and B.E.D. Kingsbury, "The modulation spectrogram: In pursuit of an invariant representation of speech," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 1997, pp. 1647-1650.
10. M.G. Heinz and J. Swaminathan, "Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory-nerve responses to chimaeric speech," JARO, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 407-423, Sep. 2009.
11. G. Hu and D. Wang, "Monaural speech segregation based on pitch tracking and amplitude modulation," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1135-1150, Sep. 2004.
12. B.E.D. Kingsbury, N. Morgan, and S. Greenberg, "Robust speech recognition using the modulation spectrogram," Speech Commun., vol. 25, pp. 117-132, 1998.
13. Q. Li and L. Atlas, "Coherent modulation filtering for speech," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 2008, pp. 4481-4484.
14. A.V. Oppenheim, R.W. Schafer, and T.G. Stockham, "Nonlinear filtering of multiplied and convolved signals," Proc. IEEE, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1264-1291, Aug. 1968.
15. S. Schimmel, "Theory of modulation frequency analysis and modulation filtering, with applications to hearing devices," Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, 2007.
16. S. Schimmel and L. Atlas, "Coherent envelope detection for modulation filtering of speech," in Proc. IEEE Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 2005, pp. 221-224.
17. Z.M. Smith, B. Delgutte, and A.J. Oxenham, "Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception," Nature, vol. 416, no. 6876, pp. 87-90, Mar. 2002.
18. R.E. Turner and M. Sahani, "Modeling Natural Sounds with Modulation Cascade Processes," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, J.C. Platt, D. Koller, Y. Singer, and S. Rowels, Eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008, pp. 1545-1552.
19. L. Xu and B.E. Pfingst, "Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception," J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 3024-3027, Dec. 2003.