The small-world effect: The influence of macro-level properties of developer collaboration networks on open-source project success

ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages

  Singh, Param Vir ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative software development; Online community; Open source software development; Productivity; Small world networks; Social networks; Team formation

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; ONLINE COMMUNITIES; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SMALL WORLD NETWORKS; SOCIAL NETWORKS; TEAM FORMATION;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; GROUPWARE; ONLINE SYSTEMS; OPEN SYSTEMS; PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77956527513     PISSN: 1049331X     EISSN: 15577392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1824760.1824763     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. BAKER, W. E. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. Amer. J. Sociology 96, 589-625.
2. BARTLETT, F. C. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press, London.
3. BASILI, V. AND CALDIERA, G. 1995. Improve software quality by reusing knowledge and experience. Sloan Manage. Rev. 37, 55-64.
4. BAUM, J. A., SHIPILOV, A. V., AND ROWLEY, T. J. 2003. Where do small worlds come from? Industrial Corporate Change 12, 697-725.
5. BERGQUIST, M. AND LJUNGBERG, J. 2001. The power of gifts: Organizing social relationships in open source communities. Inform. Syst. J. 11, 305-320.
6. BLUNDELL, R.R., GRIFFITH, R., AND VAN REENEN, J. 1995. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic J. 105, 333-344.
7. BROWN, J.S. AND DUGUID, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unifying view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Sci. 2, 40-57.
8. BOH,W.,SLAUGHTER, S., AND ESPINOSA, J. 2007. Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis.Manage. Sci. 53, 1315-1331.
9. BURT, R.S. 1992. Structural Holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. BURT, R.S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociology 110, 349-399.
11. CHENGALUR-SMITH, S., AND SIDOROVA, A. 2003. Survival of open source projects: A population ecology perspective. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference of Information Systems.
12. COHEN, W.M. AND LEVINTHAL, D.A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Q. 35, 1, 128-152.
13. COLEMAN, J. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociology 94, S95-S120.
14. COOPER, R.G. 2001. Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. Perseus Publishing, Boulder, CO.
15. COX, A. 1998. Cathedrals, bazaars and the town council. Slashdot.Org.
16. CROWSTON, K., ANNABI, H., AND HOWISON, J. 2003. Defining open source software project success. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference of Information Systems.
17. CROWSTON, K. AND SCOZZI, B. 2002. Open source software projects as virtual organizations: Competency rallying for software development. IIE Proc. Softw. 149, 3-17.
18. DAVIS, G.F., YOO, M., AND BAKER, W.E. 2003. The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982-2001. Strategic Organiz. 1, 301-326.
19. DELONE, W.H. ANDMCLEAN, E.R. 1992. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Syst. Res. 3, 60-95.
20. FLEMING, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Manage. Sci. 47, 117-132.
21. FLEMING, L., KING, C., III, AND JUDA, A. 2007. Small world and regional innovation. Organiz. Sci. 18, 938-954.
22. FLEMING, L. AND MARX, M. 2006. Managing creativity in small worlds. California Manage. Rev. 48, 6-27.
23. FLEMING, L. AND WAGUESPACK, D.M. 2007. Brokerage, boundary spanning and leadership in open innovation communities. Organiz. Sci. 18, 165-180.
24. GALLIVAN, M.J. 2001. Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organization: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Inform. Sys J. 11, 277-304.
25. GELMAN, A. AND HILL, J. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press, London.
26. GRANOVETTER, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology 78, 1360-1380.
27. GREENE, W.H. 2007. Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. NJ.
28. GREWALL, R., LILIEN, G.L., AND MALLAPRAGADA, G. 2006. Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Manage. Sci. 52, 1043-1056.
29. GULATI, R. 1998. Alliances and network. Strategic Manage. J. 19, 293-317.
30. GULATI, R. AND GARGIULO, M. 1999. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociology 104, 1439-1493.
31. HAEFLIGER, S., VON KROGH, G., AND SPAETH, S. 2008. Code reuse in open source software. Manage. Sci. 54, 180-193.
32. HAHN, J.,MOON, J., AND ZHANG, C. 2006. Impact of social ties on open source software project team formation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Open Source Systems.
33. KOGUT, B. AND WALKER, G. 2001. The small world of German corporate networks in global economy. Amer. Sociological Rev. 66, 317-335.
34. KOGUT, B. AND ZANDER, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organiz. Sci 3, 383-397.
35. KRISHNAMURTHY, S. 2002. Cave or community: An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. First Monday 7.
36. KUK, G. 2006. Strategic interaction and knowledge-sharing in the KDE developer mailing list. Manage. Sci. 52, 1031-1042.
37. LERNER, J. AND TIROLE, J. 2002. Some simple economics of open source. J. Industrial Econ. 46, 125-156.
38. MADEY, G., FREEH, V., AND TYNAN, G. 2002. The open source software development phenomenon: An analysis based on social network theory. In Proceedings of the 8th Americas Conference of Information Systems.
39. MARCH, G. AND SIMON, H. 1958. Organizations. Wiley, New York.
40. MCPHERSON, M., SMITH-LOVIN, L., AND COOK, J. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociology 27, 415-444.
41. MILGRAM, S. 1967. The small world. Psych. Today 2, 60-67.
42. MOCKUS, A., FIELDING, R., AND HERBSLEB, J. 2002. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla, ACM Trans. Softw. Engin. Method. 11, 309-346.
43. NARDUZZO, A. AND ROSSI, A. 2003. Modularity in action: GNU/Linux and free/open source software development model unleashed. http://opensource.mit. edu/papers/narduzzorossi.pdf.
44. NEWMAN,M.,STROGATZ, S., ANDWATTS, D. 2001. Random networks with arbitrary degree networks and their applications. Physical Rev. E 64, 1-17.
45. NIJMAN, T. AND VERBEEK, M. 1992. Non response in panel data: The impact on estimates of a life cycle consumption function. J. Appl. Econometrics 7, 243-257.
46. ROBERTS, J., HANN, I-H., AND SLAUGHTER, S. 2006. Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the apache projects. Manage. Sci. 52, 984-999.
47. SACKS, M. 1994. On-the-Job Learning in the Software Industry. Quorum Books, Westport, CT.
48. SCACCHI, W. 2002. Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. IEE Proc. Softw. 149, 24-39.
49. SCHILLING, M. AND PHELPS, C. 2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large scale network structure on firm innovation. Manage. Sci. 53, 1113-1126.
50. SINGH, P.V. AND TAN, Y. 2005. Stability and efficiency of communication networks in open source software development. Workshop on Information Technology and Systems.
51. SINGH, P.V. 2007. Open source software and the small world phenomenon: An empirical investigation of macro level network properties on project success. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of Information Systems.
52. SINGH, P.V., PHELPS, C., FAN, M., AND TAN, Y. 2007. Determinants of open source software development license choice: A social influence perspective. Workshop on Information Systems and Economics.
53. SINGH, P.V., TAN, Y., AND MOOKERJEE, V. 2007. Social capital, structural holes, and team composition: Collaborative networks of the open source software community. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of Information Systems.
54. SNIJDERS, T. AND BOSKER, R. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
55. STEINFIELD, C. AND SCUPOLA, A. 2006. Explaining ICT infrastructure and e-commerce uses and benefits in industrial clusters: Evidence from a biotech cluster. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences.
56. STEWART, K. AND GOSAIN, S. 2006. The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Q. 30, 291-314.
57. STEWART, K., AMMETER, T., AND MARUPING, L. 2006. Impacts of license choice and organizational sponsorship on user interest and development activity in open source software projects. Inform. Syst. Res. 17, 126-144.
58. UZZI, B. AND SPIRO, J. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Soc. 11, 447-504.
59. VAN ALSTYNE, M. AND BRYNJOLFSSON, E. 2005. Global village or cyber Balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Manage. Sci. 51, 851-868.
60. VON HIPPEL, E. AND VON KROGH, G. 2003. Open source software and the "Private-Collective" innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organiz. Sci.14, 209-225.
61. WALKER, G., KOGUT, B., AND SHAN, W. 1997. Social capital, structural holes, and the formation of an industry network, Organiz. Sci 8, 109-125.
62. WASSERMAN, S. AND FAUST, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, London.
63. WATTA, D. 1999. Networks, dynamics, and the small world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociology 105, 493-527.
64. WATTS, D. AND STROGATZ, S. 1998. Collective dynamics of Small World networks. Nature 393, 440-442.
65. WEBER, S. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
66. XU, J., GAO, Y., CHRISTLEY, S., AND MADEY, G. 2005. A topological analysis of the open source software development community. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences.