Minimisation of alignment error between a camera and a laser range finder using nelder-mead simplex direct search

IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 779-786

  Osgood, Thomas J ^a   Huang, Yingping ^a   Young, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2D IMAGES; ALIGNMENT ERROR; AVERAGE ERRORS; CALIBRATION PARAMETERS; CAMERA PARAMETER; CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM; DATA SETS; DIRECT SEARCH; EXTERNAL CALIBRATION; LASER RANGE FINDERS; LIDAR MEASUREMENTS; NELDER-MEAD SIMPLEX; NELDER-MEAD SIMPLEX SEARCH METHOD; NOVEL METHODS; OPTIMISATIONS; REFERENCE DATA; REFERENCE IMAGE; SENSOR DEVICE; SENSOR FUSION; SUM OF SQUARED ERRORS;

CALIBRATION; CAMERAS; ERRORS; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; METADATA; OPTICAL RADAR; OPTIMIZATION; PIXELS; SENSORS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 77956523237     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IVS.2010.5548126     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Lagarias, J.C., J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, and P. E. Wright, Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions, SIAM Journal of Optimisation, Vol. 9 Number 1, PP112-147, 1998.
2. Shigeyuki Morita, Teruko Nagase, Katsumi Nomizu (2001). Geometry of Differential Forms. American Mathematical Society Bookstore, p. 12. ISBN 0821810456.
3. Ingrid Carlbom, Joseph Paciorek (1978), "Planar Geometric Projections and Viewing Transformations", ACM Computing Surveys 10 (4): 465-502, doi:10.1145/356744.356750
4. Q. Zhang and R. Pless, Extrinsic Calibration of a Camera and Laser Range Finder (improves camera intrinsic calibration), in Proc. Of IEEE IROS '04, (2004).
5. C. Mei and P. Rives. Calibration between a Central Catadioptric Camera and a Laser Range Finder for Robotic Applications, In Proceedings of ICRA '06, Orlando, May, (2006).
6. S. Wasielewski and O. Strauss, Calibration of a multi-sensor system laser rangefinder/camera, Proc. of the Intelligent Vehicles' Symposium, pp. 472-477, (1995).
7. M. A. Abidi and T. Chandra, A New Efficient and Direct Solution for Pose Estimation Using Quadrangular Targets: Algorithm and Evaluation, IEEE Tran, on PAMI, 17(5), 534-538, 1995.
8. M. A. Fishier and R. C. Bolles, Random Sample Consensus: A Paradigm for Model Fitting with Applications to Image Analysis and Automated Cartomated Cartography, Communications of the ACM, 24(6), 381-395, 1981.
9. R. Horaud, B. Conio, and O. Leboulleux, An Analytic Solution for the Perspective 4-Point Problem, CVGIP, 47, 33-44, 1989.
10. L. Quan and Z. Lan, Linear N-Point Camera Pose Determination, IEEE Tran, on PAMI, 21(8), 774-780, 1999
11. H. Araüjo, R.J. Carceroni, and C.M. Brown. A fully projective formulation to improve the accuracy of Lowe's pose-estimation algorithm. In computer Vision and Image Understanding, volume 71, pages 227-238, 1998.
12. C.P. Lu, G.D. Hager, and E. Mjolsness. Fast and globally convergent pose estimation from video images. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 22(6): 610-622, 2000.
13. Danis Oberkampf, Daniel F. DeMenthon, and Larry S. Davis. Iterative pose estimation using coplanar feature points. In computer Vision and image Understanding, volume 63, pages 495-511, 1996.
14. Gerald Schweighofer and Axel Pinz. Robust pose estimation from a planar target. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 28: 2024-2030, 2006. (Pubitemid 46405712)
15. Francesc Moreno-Noguer, Vincent Lepetit, and Pascal Fua. Accurate non-iterative o(n) solution to the pnp problem. IEEE 11th International Confrence on Computer Vision., pages 1-8, 14-21 Oct. 2007.
16. Gerald Schweighofer and Axel Pinz. Robust pose estimation from a planar target. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 28: 2024-2030, 2006.