The Mobile-Only population in Portugal and its impact in a dual frame telephone survey

Survey Research Methods

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 105-111

  Vicente, Paula ^a   Reis, Elizabeth ^a  

^a INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Mobile phone surveys; Mobile phone only households; Noncoverage rate; Telephone survey methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956515075     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18643361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2006). Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.
2. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2007). Special Journal Issue Analyzes Challenges of Cell-Only Americans to Survey Research. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/specialjournalissueonchallengesofcellonlyamericans.
3. Autoridade Nacional das Comunicações (ANACOM). (2007). Sala de Imprensa: número de assinantes do serviço telefónico móvel aumenta 10% em 2007. Available at: http://www.anacom.pt/template9.jsp?categoryId=1643.
4. Brick, J. M., Brick, P., Dipko, S., Presser, S., Tucker, C., & Yuan, Y. (2007). Cell Phone Feasibility in the U.S.: Sampling and Calling Cell Numbers Versus Landline Numbers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 23-29.
5. Callegaro, M., & Poggio, T. (2004). Where Can I Call You?: The Mobile Phone Revolution and Its Impact on Survey Research and Coverage Error - A Discussion of the Italian Case. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Logic and Methodology, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
6. Cardoso, G., Espanha, R., Araújo, V., & Gomes, M. C. (2007). O mercado nacional das comunicações móveis. OberCom Working Report.
7. EU Statistics. (2007). Special Eurobarometer 274: ECommunications Households Survey. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs274sumen.pdf.
8. Keeter, S. (2006). The Impact of Cell Phone Noncoverage Bias on Polling in the 2004 Presidential Election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 88-98.
9. Keeter, S., Kennedy, C., Clark, A., Tompson, T., & Mokrzycki, M. (2007). What’s Missing from National Landline RDD Surveys? The Impact of the Growing Cell-Only Population. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 772-792.
10. Kuusela, V., & Simpanen, M. (2002). Effects of Mobile Phones on Telephone Survey Practices and Results. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Copenhagen, Denmark.
11. Roy, G., & Vanheuverzwyn, A. (2002). Mobile Phone in Sample Surveys. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Copenhagen, Denmark.
12. Statistics Portugal. (2008). Estatísticas das comunicações 2006. Instituto Nacional de Estatística.
13. Vehovar, V., Belak, E., Batagelj, Z., & Cikic, S. (2004). Mobile Phone Surveys: The Slovenian case Study. Metodoloski zvezki, 1, 1-19.
14. Youth Observatory. (2005). Estudo sobre os Jovens Portugueses. Available at: http://recursos.juventude.gov.pt/IPJobservatorio.pdf.
15. Yuan, A., Allen, B., Brick, J. M., Dipko, S., Presser, S., Tucker, C., et al. (2005). Surveying Households on Cell Phones - Results and Lessons. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association.