Guiding comparative effectiveness research A US perspective: An interview between Howard Birnbaum (of Analysis Group, Inc., and guest co-editor of this special issue) and Jean R. Slutsky (Director, center for outcomes and evidence, agency for healthcare research and quality)

PharmacoEconomics

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 839-842

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

Decision making; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY;

EID: 77956511871     PISSN: 11707690     EISSN: 11792027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/11535800-000000000-00000     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, 108th Cong
2. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, HR1, 111th Cong
3. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user's guide [prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center (Outcome Sciences, Inc. dba Outcome) under Contract no. HHSA29020050035I TO1; AHRQ publication no. 07-EHC001-1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007 Apr
4. US National Library of Medicine. Fact sheet: the National Library of Medicine [online]. Available from URL: http://www. nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/ nlm.html [Accessed 2010 May 7]
5. Atkins D, Siegel J, Slutsky J. Making policy when the evidence is in dispute. Health Aff 2005; 24 (1): 102-113