Robotic single-incision transabdominal and transvaginal surgery: Initial experience with intersecting robotic arms

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 251-255

  Hagen, Monika E ^a,b   Wagner, Oliver J ^a   Inan, Ihsan ^b   Morel, Philippe ^b   Fasel, Jean ^c   Jacobsen, Garth ^a   Spivack, Adam ^a   Thompson, Kari ^a   Wong, Brian ^a   Fischer, Lauren ^a   Talamini, Mark ^a   Horgan, Santiago ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Da Vinci; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; NOTES; One port umbilical surgery; Robotic surgery; Single access surgery; Single incision laparoscopic surgery

Indexed keywords

ROBOTIC ARMS; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

DA VINCI; INTUITIVE CONTROLS; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE SURGERY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMENAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERIES; ONE-PORT UMBILICAL SURGERY; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SINGLE INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; SINGLE-ACCESS SURGERIES; SINGLE-INCISION SURGERIES;

LAPAROSCOPY;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPY; PERITONEAL CAVITY; ROBOTICS; SWINE; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 77956497055     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.310     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; CD006231.
2. Purkayastha S, Tilney HS, Georgiou P, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1294-1300. (Pubitemid 47125059)
3. Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Kum CK, et al. The EAES Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements - September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 550-563.
4. Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Christen D, et al. Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 581-583. (Pubitemid 351982600)
5. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, et al. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 1800-1807.
6. Lomanto D, De Angelis L, Ceci V, et al. Two-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a reproducible technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001; 11: 248-251. (Pubitemid 32769605)
7. Ng WT. Optimal cosmetic results without increased operative risk. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1332-1333.
8. Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, et al. Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 1178-1183.
9. Gettman MT, Box G, Averch T, et al. Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology? Eur Urol 2008; 53: 1117-1120.
10. Zorron R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, et al. NOTES.Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case. Surg Innov 2007; 14: 279-283.
11. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Cullen J, et al. NOTES: the hybrid technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17: 402-406.
12. Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery, October 2005. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 329-333.
13. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P, et al. [Scarless surgery: myth or reality through NOTES?]. Rev Med Suisse 2008; 4: 1550-1552.
14. Zorron R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, et al. NOTES. Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case. Surg Innov 2007; 14: 279-283.
15. Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, et al. Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1427-1429.
16. Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 913-915. (Pubitemid 350055986)
17. Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, et al. Robotic NOTES (Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience. Urology 2008; 71: 996-1000.
18. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int 2009; 103: 366-369.
19. Aron M, Canes D, Desai MM, et al. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2009; 103: 516-521.
20. Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 1020-1029.
21. Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M, et al. Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2008; 180: 637-641.
22. Goel RK, Kaouk JH. Single port access renal cryoablation (SPARC): a new approach. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 1204-1209.
23. Hong TH, You YK, Lee KH. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: scarless cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2009; 23(6): 1393-1397.
24. Kaouk JH, Goel RK. Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009; 55(5): 1163-1169.
25. Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al. Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 2008; 71: 3-6. (Pubitemid 351173288)
26. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, et al. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 823-826.