Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 817-826

  Bredeson, Larry ^a   Quiceno Gonzalez, Raul ^a   Riera Palou, Xavier ^a   Harrison, Andrew ^a  

^a SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon footprint; CO2 allocation methods; Crude oil refining CO2 emissions; Diesel production; Energy consuming products; Gasoline production; H2 effects on refinery CO2; Life cycle assessment; Refining emissions

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; DIESEL FUEL; GASOLINE; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; PETROLEUM;

ARTICLE; CARBON ALLOCATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY CONVERSION; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENERGY YIELD; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 77956493531     PISSN: 09483349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-010-0204-3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ARB (2008) Detailed California-modified GREET pathway for California-reformulated gasoline-CARBOB blended with ethanol. California Environmental Protection Agency, April 22, 2008
2. A Azapagic R Clift 1999 Allocation of environmental burdens in multiple-function systems J Cleaner Prod 7 2 101 119 10.1016/S0959-6526(98) 00046-8
3. 2 and pollutant emissions of a refinery to petroleum finished products Oil Gas Sci Tech Rev IFP 58 6 685 692 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvVeqsrY%3D 10.2516/ogst:2003048
4. Brown HL, Hamel BB, Hedman BA (1996) Energy analysis of 108 industrial processes. Fairmont Press: Lilburn p 27-31
5. A Charnes WW Cooper B Mellon 1952 Blending aviation gasoline-a study in programming interdependent activities in an integrated oil company Econometrica 20 2 135 139 10.2307/1907844
6. COD (2008) Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources, 2008/0016 (COD)
7. CONCAWE, EUCAR (2006) Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context. Well-to-TANK Report
8. EIA (2009) Energy Information Administration, forecast and analysis. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/forecasting.html
9. T Ekvall 1999 Key methodological issues for life cycle inventory analysis of paper recycling J Cleaner Prod 7 4 281 294 10.1016/S0959-6526(99)00149-3
10. T Ekvall G Finnveden 2001 Allocation in ISO 14041: a critical review Journal of Cleaner Production 9 197 208 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00052-4 (Pubitemid 32196305)
11. T Ekvall B Weidema 2004 System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis International Journal LCA 9 3 161 171 10.1007/BF02994190
12. E Furuholt 1995 Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel Resour Conservat Recycl 14 251 263 10.1016/0921-3449(95)00020-J
13. GREET (2008) Argonne National Laboratory, GREET model 1.8b. Available at http://www.transportation.anl.gov/modeling-simulation/GREET/index.html
14. JM Griffin 1972 The process analysis alternative to statistical cost functions: an application to petroleum refining Am Econ Rev 62 46 56
15. International Standard Organization (ISO) 1998 Environmental management life cycle analysis assessment: goal and scope definition and inventory analysis ISO 14041 10 01
16. LBST (2007) Zittel W, Schindler J Crude oil the supply outlook. Energy Watch Group, paper EWG-Series No 3, 2007
17. LCFS (2007) Farrell, A. and Sperling, D. A low-carbon fuel standard for California part 2: policy analysis. Institute of Transportation Studies UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center. University of California, Berkeley, Paper UCB-ITS-TSRC-RR-2007-3
18. NETL (2008) Development of baseline data and analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of petroleum-based fuels. November 26, 2008. DOE/NETL-2009/1346
19. N Ozalp B Hyman 2007 Allocation of energy inputs among the end uses in the US petroleum and coal products industry Energy 32 1460 1470 10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.006 (Pubitemid 46589871)
20. Palmer KH, Boudwin NK, Patton HA, Rowland AJ, Sammes JD, Smith DM (1984) A model-management framework for mathematical programming-an exxon monograph. John Wiley and Sons, New York
21. 2 emissions of an oil refinery with Aumann-Shapley prices Energy Economics 29 563 577 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.02. 002 (Pubitemid 46395118)
22. 2 emissions in petroleum refineries to petroleum joint products: a linear programming model for practical application Energy Economics 29 974 997 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.11.005 (Pubitemid 46796619)
23. 2 emissions in petroleum refineries to petroleum joint products: a case study. Selected paper for presentation at the 9th Annual USAEE/IAEE/ASSA meeting on current issues in energy economics and energy modelling, January 2007, Chicago, USA
24. Sperlling D, Cannon J (2007) Driving climate change, cutting carbon from transportation. Academic, USA
25. M Wang L Hanjie J Molburg 2004 Allocation of energy use in petroleum refineries to petroleum products, implications for life cycle energy use and emission inventory of petroleum transportation fuels Int J LCA 9 1 34 44 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhsFamsbs%3D 10.1007/BF02978534