Depth-averaged, spatially distributed flow dynamic and solute transport modelling of a large-scaled, subtropical constructed wetland

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 2724-2737

  Min, Joong Hyuk ^a   Wise, William R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Dispersivity; Distributed modelling; Free water surface constructed wetland; Hydraulic resistance; Hydrodynamics; Solute transport

Indexed keywords

BASIC MODELS; CHLORIDE CONCENTRATIONS; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; DISPERSIVITY; DISTRIBUTED DATA; DISTRIBUTED FLOW; DISTRIBUTED MODELLING; FIELD MONITORING; FLORIDA , USA; FLOW AND TRANSPORT; FREE WATER SURFACES; HYDRAULIC RESISTANCE; LONGITUDINAL DISPERSIVITY; MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT; MIKE-21; MODEL CALIBRATION; MODEL ERRORS; MODEL INPUTS; MONITORING SITES; ORDER OF MAGNITUDE; PHYSICALLY BASED; ROOT-MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT MODEL; SOLUTE TRANSPORT MODELLING; SPATIO-TEMPORAL VARIATION; STEPPING STONE; STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS; SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATIONS; TESTING DATA; TREATMENT WETLANDS; TWO-DIMENSIONAL HYDRODYNAMICS; VEGETATION DISTRIBUTION; VEGETATION TYPE; WATER-LEVEL FLUCTUATION;

AGRICULTURAL RUNOFF; CALIBRATION; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; FLUID DYNAMICS; HYDRAULICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MODELS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; STORM SEWERS; STREAM FLOW; TIME SERIES; TWO DIMENSIONAL; VEGETATION; WASTEWATER; WATER LEVELS;

WETLANDS;

AGRICULTURAL RUNOFF; CONSTRUCTED WETLAND; ESTIMATION METHOD; HYDRODYNAMICS; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; STORMWATER; TEMPORAL VARIATION; VEGETATION TYPE; WATER LEVEL;

EVERGLADES; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956485389     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7686     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abtew W. 1996. Evapotranspiration measurements and modeling for three wetland systems in south Florida. Water Resources Bulletin 32: 465-473.
2. Arnold JG, Allen PM, Morgan DS. 2001. Hydrologic model for design and constructed wetlands. Wetlands 21: 167-178.
3. Barko JW, James WF. 1997. Effects of submerged aquatic macrophytes on nutrient dynamics, sedimentation, and resuspension. In The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes-Ecological Studies, vol. 131, Jeppesen E, Søndergaard MA, Søndergaard MO, Christoffersen K (eds). Springer: New York; 197-214.
4. Braskerud BC. 2001. The influence of vegetation on sedimentation and resuspension of soil particles in small constructed wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 1447-1457.
5. Chen XJ. 1994. Effects of Hydrodynamics and Sediment Transport Processes on Nutrient Dynamics in Shallow Lakes and Estuaries. PhD dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
6. Chen XJ, Sheng YP. 2005. Three-dimensional modeling of sediment and phosphorus dynamics in Lake Okeechobee, Florida: Spring 1989 simulation. Journal of Environmental Engineering: ASCE 131: 359-374.
7. Chimney MJ, Goforth G. 2001. Environmental impacts to the Everglades ecosystem: a historical perspective and restoration strategies. Water Science and Technology 44(11-12): 93-100.
8. Conaway JS, Moran EH. 2004. Development and calibration of a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of the Tanana River near Tok, Alaska. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1225, US Geological Survey: Reston; 21.
9. Cook CB, Richmond MC, Coleman A, Rakowski CL, Titzler PS, Bliech MD. 2003. Numerically Simulating the Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Environment for Migrating Salmon in the Lower Snake River. US DOE report PNNL-14297: Richland.
10. Cui J, Li C, Sun G, Trettin C. 2005. Linkage of MIKE SHE to Wetland-DNDC for carbon budgeting and anaerobic biogeochemistry simulation. Biogeochemistry 72: 147-167.
11. Dennison WC, Orth RJ, Moore KA, Stevenson JC, Carter V, Kollar S, Bergstrom PW, Batiuk RA. 1993. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation. Bioscience 43: 86-94.
12. DHI. 2005. MIKE 21 Flow Model Hydrodynamics Module-Scientific Documentation, Danish Hydraulic Institute: Hørsholm, Denmark.
13. Ekebjaerg L, Justesen P. 1991. An explicit scheme for advection diffusion modeling in two dimensions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 88: 287-297.
14. Feng K, Molz FJ. 1997. A 2-D, diffusion-based, wetland flow model. Journal of Hydrology 196: 230-250.
15. Fernandez GP, Chescheir GM, Skaggs RW, Amatya DM. 2006. DRAINMOD-GIS: a lumped parameter watershed scale drainage and water quality model. Agricultural Water Management 81: 77-97.
16. Ferrarin C, Umgiesser G. 2005. Hydrodynamic modeling of a coastal lagoon: the Cabras lagoon in Sardinia, Italy. Ecological Modelling 188: 340-357.
17. Gearheart RA. 1999. The use of free surface constructed wetland as an alternative process treatment train to meet unrestricted water reclamation standards. Water Science and Technology 40(4): 375-382.
18. Goforth GF. 2001. Surmounting the engineering challenges of Everglades restoration. Water Science and Technology 44(11-12): 295-302.
19. Goforth GF. 2005. Summary of STA Vegetation Management Practices. South Florida Water Management District: West Palm Beach.
20. Guardo M, Fink L, Fontaine TD, Newman S, Chimney M, Bearzotti R, Goforth G. 1995. Large-scale constructed wetlands for nutrient removal from stormwater runoff: an everglades restoration project. Environmental Management 19: 879-889.
21. Guardo M, Tomasello RS. 1995. Hydrodynamic simulations of a constructed wetland in South Florida. Water Resources Bulletin 31: 687-701.
22. Hammer DA. 1989. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural. Lewis Publishers: Chelsea; 831.
23. Harvey JW, Saiers JE, Newlin JT. 2005. Solute transport and storage mechanisms in wetlands of the Everglades, south Florida. Water Resources Research 41: W05009. DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003507.
24. Hendry CD, Brezonik PL. 1980. Chemistry of precipitation at Gainesville, Florida. Environmental Science and Technology 14: 843-849.
25. Ho DT, Engel VC, Variano EA, Schmieder PJ, Condon ME. 2009. Tracer studies of sheet flow in the Florida Everglades. Geophysical Research Letters 36: L09401. DOI: 10.1029/2009GL037355.
26. Horppila J, Nurminen L. 2003. Effects of submerged macrophytes on sediment resuspension and internal phosphorus loading in Lake Hiidenvesi (southern Finland). Water Research 37: 4468-4474.
27. Huang YH, Saiers JE, Harvey JW, Noe GB, Mylon S. 2008. Advection, dispersion, and filtration of fine particles within emergent vegetation of the Florida Everglades. Water Resources Research 44: W04408. DOI: 10.1029/2007WR006290.
28. Jawitz JW, Muñoz-Carpena R, Muller S, Grace KA, James AI. 2008. Development, Testing, and Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses of a Transport and Reaction Simulation Engine (TaRSE) for Spatially Distributed Modeling of Phosphorus in South Florida Peat Marsh Wetlands. USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5029, USGS: Reston; 109.
29. Ji Z. 2008. Hydrodynamics and Water Quality: Modeling Rivers, Lakes, and Estuaries. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey; 676.
30. Jin KR, Hamrick JH, Tisdale T. 2001. Application of three-dimensional hydrodynamic model for Lake Okeechobee. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering: ASCE 126: 758-771.
31. Johnson BH, Kim KW, Heath RE, Hsieh BB, Butler L. 1993. Validation of a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering: ASCE 119: 2-20.
32. Juston J, DeBusk TA. 2006. Phosphorus mass load and outflow concentration relationships in stormwater treatment areas for Everglades restoration. Ecological Engineering 26: 206-223.
33. Kadlec RH. 2000. The inadequacy of first-order treatment wetland models. Ecological Engineering 15: 105-119.
34. Kadlec RH, Hammer DE. 1988. Modeling nutrient behavior in wetlands. Ecological Modelling 40: 37-66.
35. Kadlec RH, Knight RL. 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton; 893.
36. Kazezyilmaz-Alhan CM, Medina MA Jr, Richardson CJ. 2007. A wetland hydrology and water quality model incorporating surface water/groundwater interactions. Water Resources Research 43: W04434. DOI: 10.1029/2006WR005003.
37. Keefe SH, Barber LB, Runkel RL, Ryan JN, McKnight DM, Wass RD. 2004. Conservative and reactive solute transport in constructed wetlands. Water Resources Research 40: W01201. DOI: 10.1029/2003WR-002130.
38. Kivaisi AK. 2001. The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review. Ecological Engineering 16: 545-560.
39. Kronvang B, Hoffmann CC, Svendsen LM, Windolf J, Jensen JP, Dørge J. 1999. Retention of nutrients in river basins. Aquatic Ecology 33: 29-40.
40. Lal AMW. 1998. Weighted implicit finite-volume model for overland flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering: ASCE 124: 941-950.
41. Langevin C, Swain E, Wolfert M. 2005. Simulation of integrated surface-water/ground-water flow and salinity for a coastal wetland and adjacent estuary. Journal of Hydrology 314: 212-234.
42. Lee JK, Roig LC, Jenter HL, Visser HM. 2004. Drag coefficients for modeling flow through emergent vegetation in the Florida Everglades. Ecological Engineering 22: 237-248.
43. Leonard L, Croft A, Childers D, Mitchell-Bruker S, Solo-Gabriele H, Ross M. 2006. Characteristics of surface-water flows in the ridge and slough landscape of Everglades National Park: implications for particulate transport. Hydrobiologia 569: 5-22.
44. Liyanage TR, Huebner RS. 2005. Water budget analysis for Stormwater Treatment Area 5 (Water Year 2003-2004), Technical Publication ERA 427. South Florida Water Management District, South Florida Water Management: West Palm Beach.
45. Martinez CJ, Wise WR. 2003. Analysis of constructed treatment wetland hydraulics with the transient storage model OTIS. Ecological Engineering 20: 211-222.
46. McMichael CE, Hope AS, Loaiciga HA. 2006. Distributed hydrological modelling in California semi-arid shrublands: MIKE SHE model calibration and uncertainty estimation. Journal of Hydrology 317: 307-324.
47. Min JH, Wise WR. 2009. Simulating short-circuiting flow in a constructed wetland: the implications of bathymetry and vegetation effects. Hydrological Processes 23: 830-841.
48. Mitsch WJ. 1994. Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 967.
49. Moustafa MZ, Hamrick JM. 2000. Calibration of the wetland hydrodynamic model to the Everglades Nutrient Removal Project. Water Quality and Ecosystem Modeling 1: 141-167.
50. Nepf HM. 1999. Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resources Research 35: 479-489.
51. Newman JM, Lynch T. 2001. The Everglades Nutrient Removal Project test cells: STA optimization status of the research at the north site. Water Science and Technology 44(11-12): 117-122.
52. Nick Miller, Inc. 2006. STA 5 vegetation Map. http://my.sfwmd.gov/gisapps/sfwmdxwebdc/dataview.asp?queryDunq idD1660 (Accessed on August 24, 2009).
53. Park K, Jung HS, Kim HS, Ahn SM. 2005. Three-dimensional hydrodynamic-eutrophication model (HEM-3D): application to Kwang-Yang Bay, Korea. Marine Environmental Research 60: 171-193.
54. Parrish DM, Huebner RS. 2004. Water budget analysis for Stormwater Treatment Area 5 (May 1, 2000 to April 30, 2003), Technical Publications EMA 418. South Florida Water Management District, South Florida Water Management: West Palm Beach.
55. Persson J. 2005. The use of design elements in wetlands. Nordic Hydrology 36: 113-120.
56. Persson J, Somes NLG, Wong THF. 1999. Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Science and Technology 40(3): 291-300.
57. Pietro K, Bearzotti R, Germain G, Iricanin N. 2009. STA Performance, Compliance, and Optimization, Chapter 5. 2009 South Florida Environmental Report. South Florida Water Management District, South Florida Water Management: West Palm Beach.
58. Pietro KC, Chimney MJ, Steinman AD. 2006. Phosphorus removal by the Ceratophyllum/periphyton complex in a south Florida (USA) freshwater marsh. Ecological Engineering 27: 290-300.
59. Saiers JE, Harvey JW, Mylon SE. 2003. Surface-water transport of suspended matter through wetland vegetation of the Florida everglades. Geophysical Research Letters 30: 1987. DOI: 10.1029/2003GL018132.
60. SFWMD. 2000. Operation Plan: Stormwater Treatment Area 5 (Revised). South Florida Water Management District: West Palm Beach.
61. SFWMD. 2005. Final Documentation for the South Florida Water Management Model (SFWMM) v5.5. South Florida Water Management District: West Palm Beach.
62. Somes NLG, Bishop WA, Wong THF. 1999. Numerical simulation of wetland hydrodynamics. Environmental International 25: 773-779.
63. Sutron Corp. 2005. STA 5 2-D Hydraulic Modeling (linked cells model), Task 4.3 Final report. South Florida Water Management District: West Palm Beach.
64. Swain ED, Wolfert MA, Bales JD, Goodwin CR. 2004. Two-dimensional Hydrodynamic Simulation of Surface Water Flow and Transport to Florida Bay through the Southern Inland and Coastal Systems (SICS), U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 03-4287, USGS: Tallahassee; 56.
65. Thompson JR, Sorenson HR, Gavin H, Refsgaard A. 2004. Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modelling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England. Journal of Hydrology 293: 151-179.
66. Tsanis IK, Prescott KL, Shen H. 1998. Modelling of phosphorus and suspended solids in Cootes Paradise marsh. Ecological Modelling 114: 1-17.
67. Van Nes EH, Scheffer M. 2005. A strategy to improve the contribution of complex simulation models to ecological theory. Ecological Modelling 185: 153-164.
68. Wantman Group Inc. 2005. Stormwater Treatment Area 5 Topographic Survey. West Palm Beach.
69. Warren IR, Bach HK. 1992. MIKE 21: a modeling system for estuaries, coastal waters and seas. Environmental Software 7: 229-240.
70. Zacharias I, Gianni A. 2008. Hydrodynamic and dispersion modeling as a tool for restoration of coastal ecosystems. Application to a re-flooded lagoon. Environmental Modelling and Software 23: 751-767.