Strongly interacting dynamics beyond the standard model on a space-time lattice

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 368, Issue 1924, 2010, Pages 3657-3670

  Lucini, Biagio ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Lattice gauge theory; Mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking; Strongly interacting dynamics beyond the standard model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAGES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; QUANTUM THEORY; STANDARDS;

ADJOINT REPRESENTATION; ELECTROWEAK INTERACTIONS; ENERGY SCALE; FINITE SIZE SCALING; FIXED POINTS; FUNDAMENTAL THEORY; FUTURE DIRECTIONS; GAUGE THEORY; LATTICE GAUGE THEORY; LOW ENERGIES; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; STRONGLY INTERACTING DYNAMICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL; SYMMETRY-BREAKING; TECHNICOLOUR; THE STANDARD MODEL; THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS;

DYNAMICS;

EID: 77956482404     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0030     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Amsler, C. et al. 2008 Review of particle physics. Phys. Lett. B 667, 1. (doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2008.07.018)
2. Appelquist, T. W., Karabali, D. & Wijewardhana, L. C. R. 1986 Chiral hierarchies and the flavor changing neutral current problem in technicolor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 957. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.57.957)
3. Armoni, A. 2010 The conformal window from the worldline formalism. Nucl. Phys. B 826, 328-336. (doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.10.010)
4. Bursa, F., Del Debbio, L., Keegan, L., Pica, C. & Pickup, T. 2010 Mass anomalous dimension in SU(2) with two adjoint fermions. Phys. Rev. D 81, 014505. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.014505)
5. Catterall, S. & Sannino, F. 2007 Minimal walking on the lattice. Phys. Rev. D 76, 034504. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.034504)
6. Catterall, S., Giedt, J., Sannino, F. & Schneible, J. 2008 Phase diagram of SU(2) with 2 flavors of dynamical adjoint quarks. J. High Energy Phys. 11, 009. (doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/11/009)
7. Catterall, S., Giedt, J., Sannino, F. & Schneible, J. 2009 Probes of nearly conformal behavior in lattice simulations of minimal walking technicolor. See http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.4387.
8. DeGrand, T. 2009 Finite-size scaling tests for SU(3) lattice gauge theory with color sextet fermions. Phys. Rev. D 80, 114507. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80. 114507)
9. Del Debbio, L., Patella, A. & Pica, C. 2008 Higher representations on the lattice: numerical simulations. SU(2) with adjoint fermions. http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2058.
10. Del Debbio, L., Lucini, B., Patella, A., Pica, C. & Rago, A. 2009 Conformal versus confining scenario in SU(2) with adjoint fermions. Phys. Rev. D 80, 074507. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.80.074507)
11. Dietrich, D. D. & Sannino, F. 2007 Conformal window of SU(N) gauge theories with fermions in higher dimensional representation. Phys. Rev. D 75, 085018. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.085018)
12. Dimopoulos, S. & Susskind, L. 1979 Mass without scalars. Nucl. Phys. B 155, 237-252. (doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90364-X)
13. Eichten, E. & Lane, K. D. 1980 Dynamical breaking of weak interaction symmetries. Phys. Lett. B 90, 125-130. (doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90065-9)
14. Evans, N. & Sannino, F. 2005 Minimal walking technicolour, the top mass and precision electroweak measurements. See http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/ 0512080.
15. Fleming, G. T. 2008 Strong interactions for the LHC. Proc. Sci (LATTICE 2008), 021 (XXVI Int. Symp. on Lattice Field Theory, 14-19 July 2008, Williamsburg, VA). See http://pos.sissa.it/ archive/conferences/066/021/ LATTICE%202008-021.pdf.
16. Hietanen, A. J., Rantaharju, J., Rummukainen, K. & Tuominen, K. 2009a Spectrum of SU(2) lattice gauge theory with two adjoint Dirac flavours. J. High Energy Phys. 05, 025. (doi:10.1088/ 1126-6708/2009/05/025)
17. Hietanen, A. J., Rummukainen, K. & Tuominen, K. 2009b Evolution of the coupling constant in SU(2) lattice gauge theory with two adjoint fermions. Phys. Rev. D 80, 094504. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.80.094504)
18. Hill, C. T. & Simmons, E. H. 2003 Strong dynamics and electroweak symmetry breaking. Phys. Rep. 381, 235-402. (doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00140-6) (Pubitemid 36745727)
19. Holdom, B. 1985 Techniodor. Phys. Lett. B 150, 301. (doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(85)91015-9)
20. Kraml, S. et al. (eds) 2006 CP studies and non-standard Higgs physics. CPNSH report: the hitchhikers guide to non-standard Higgs physics. CERN-2006-009. See http://kraml.home. cern.ch/kraml/cpnsh/report.html.
21. Miransky, V. A. 1999 Dynamics in the conformal window in QCD like theories. Phys. Rev. D 59, 105003. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.105003)
22. Pallante, E. 2009 Strongly and slightly flavored gauge theories. Proc. Sci, (LAT2009), 015 (XXVII Int. Symp. on Lattice Field Theory, 26-31 July 2009, Beijing, China). See http://pos.sissa.it/archive/conferences/091/015/LAT2009- 015.pdf.
23. Peskin, M. E. & Takeuchi, T. 1992 Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections. Phys. Rev. D 46, 381-409. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.381)
24. Pica, C., Del Debbio, L., Lucini, B., Patella, A. & Rago, A. 2009 Technicolor on the lattice. See http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.3178.
25. Poppitz, E. & Ünsal, M. 2009 Conformality or confinement (II): one-flavor CFTs and mixedrepresentation QCD. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 011 (doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/12/011)
26. Sannino, F. 2009 Conformal chiral dynamics. Phys. Rev. D 80, 017901.
27. Sannino, F. 2010 Higher representations duals. Nucl. Phys. B 830, 179-194 (doi:10.1016/ j.nuclphysb.2009.12.026)
28. Sannino, F. & Tuominen, K. 2005 Techniorientifold. Phys. Rev. D 71, 051901. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.71.051901)
29. Susskind, L. 1979 Dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Weinberg-Salam theory. Phys. Rev. D 20, 2619-2625. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.20. 2619)
30. Weinberg, S. 1976 Implications of dynamical symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. D 13, 974-996. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.974)
31. Yamawaki, K., Bando, M. & Matumoto, K.-I. 1986 Scale invariant technicolor model and a technidilaton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1335. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1335)