A specialist-generalist classification of the arable flora and its response to changes in agricultural practices

BMC Ecology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Fried, Guillaume ^a,b   Petit, Sandrine ^a   Reboud, Xavier ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b LNPV   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HERBICIDE;

AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; BIOTA; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROP; ECOLOGY; FRANCE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METHODOLOGY; WEED;

AGRICULTURE; BIOTA; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ECOLOGY; FRANCE; HERBICIDES; PLANT WEEDS;

EID: 77956481421     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-10-20     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Hutchinson GE. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Sym 1957, 22:415-427.
2. Colwell RK, Futuyma DJ. On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap. Ecology 1971, 52:567-576.
3. Petraitis PS. Likelihood Measures of Niche Breadth and Overlap. Ecology 1979, 60:703-710.
4. Smith EP. Niche Breadth, Resource Availability, and Inference. Ecology 1982, 63:1675-1681.
5. Levins R. Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment. I. The fitness set and adaptive function. Am Nat 1962, 96:361-373.
6. MacArthur RH. Geographical Ecology 1972, New York, USA: Harper & Row.
7. Futuyma DJ, Moreno G. The evolution of ecological specialisation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1988, 19:207-233.
8. Kawecki TJ. Accumulation of deleterious mutations and the evolutionary cost of being a generalist. Am Nat 1994, 144::833-838.
9. Southwood TRE. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies?. J Anim Ecol 1977, 46:337-365.
10. Brouat C, Chevallier H, Meusnier S, Noblecourt T, Rasplus J-Y. Specialization and habitat: spatial and environmental effects on abundance and genetic diversity of forest generalist and specialist Carabus species. Mol Ecol 2004, 13:1815-1826. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02206.x, 15189205.
11. Sol D, Timmermans S, Lefebvre L. Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim Behav 2002, 63:495-502.
12. Dall SRX, Cuthill IC. The information costs of generalism. Oikos 1997, 80:197-202.
13. Weiher E, Keddy PA. Assembly rules as general constraints on community composition. Ecological Assembly Rules: Perspectives, Advances, Retreats 1999, 251-271. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Weiher E, Keddy PA.
14. Scott MC, Helfman GS. Native invasions, homogenization, and the mismeasure of integrity of fish assemblages. Fisheries 2001, 26:6-15.
15. Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, Lee A, Jiguet F. Functional Homogenization Effect of Urbanization on Bird Communities. Conserv Biol 2007, 21:741-751. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00671.x, 17531052.
16. Smart SM, Thompson K, Marrs RH, Le Duc MG, Maskell LC, Firbank LG. Biotic homogenization and changes in species diversity across human-modified ecosystems. P Royal Soc B 2006, 273:2659-2665.
17. MacKinney ML, Lockwood JL. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 1999, 14:450-453. 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1, 10511724.
18. Bowers MA, Harris LC. A large-scale metapopulation model of interspecific competition and environmental-change. Ecol Model 1994, 72:251-273.
19. Lososova Z, Chytry M, Cimalova S, Kropac Z, Otypkova Z, Pysek P, Tichy L. Weed vegetation of arable land in Central Europe: Gradients of diversity and species composition. J Veg Sci 2004, 15:415-422.
20. Fried G, Norton LR, Reboud X. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2008, 128:68-76.
21. Bisang I, Bergamini A, Lienhard L. Environmental-friendly farming in Switzerland is not hornwort-friendly. Biol Cons 2009, 142:2104-2113.
22. Firbank LG. Short-term variability of plant populations within a regularly disturbed habitat. Oecologia 1993, 94:351-355.
23. Lavorel S, Garnier E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 2002, 16:545-556.
24. Legère A, Stevenson FC, Benoit DL. Diversity and assembly of weed communities: contrasting responses across cropping systems. Weed Res 2005, 45:303-315.
25. Smith RG, Gross KL. Assembly of weed communities along a crop diversity gradient. J Appl Ecol 2007, 44:046-1056.
26. Ulber L, Steinmann HH, Klimek S, Isselstein J. An on-farm approach to investigate the impact of diversified crop rotations on weed species richness and composition in winter wheat. Weed Research 2009, 49:534-543.
27. Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Rio Carvalho C, de Snoo GR, Eden P. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. Journal of Env Man 2001, 63:337-365.
28. Schroeder D, Mueller-Schaerer H, Stinson CSA. A European weed survey in 10 major crop systems to identify targets for biological control. Weed Res 1993, 33:449-458.
29. Fridley JD, Vandermast DB, Kuppinger DM, Manthey M, Peet RK. Co-occurrence based assessment of habitat generalists and specialists: a new approach for the measurement of niche width. J Ecology 2007, 95:707-722.
30. Brown JH. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 1984, 124:255-279.
31. Gaston KJ, Spicer IJ. The relationship between range size and niche breadth: a test using five species of Gammarus (Amphipoda). Global Ecol Biogeogr 2001, 10:179-188.
32. Andersson TN, Milberg P. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Sci 1998, 46:30-38.
33. Fried G, Chauvel B, Reboud X. A functional analysis of large-scale temporal shifts from 1970 to 2000 in weed assemblages of sunflower crops in France. J Veg Sci 2009, 20:49-58.
34. Stevenson FC, Legere A, Simard RR, Angers DA, Pageau D, Lafond J. Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Sci 1997, 45:798-806.
35. Légère A, Derksen DA. Is Diversity a Useful Concept for Weed Management?. XIième Colloque International sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes 2000, 407-410.
36. Andreasen C, Stryhn H, Streibig JC. Decline of the flora in Danish arable fields. J Appl Ecol 1996, 33:619-626.
37. Baessler C, Klotz S. Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2006, 115:43-50.
38. Fried G, Petit S, Dessaint F, Reboud X. Arable weed decline in Northern France: crop edges as refugia for weed conservation?. Biol Cons 2009, 142:238-243.
39. Booth BD, Swanton CJ. Assembly theory applied to weed communities. Weed Sci 2002, 50:2-13.
40. Fried G, Reboud X, Gasquez J, Delos M. Le réseau « Biovigilance Flore »: Présentation du dispositif et première synthèse des résultats. Vingtième conférence du Columa. Journées internationales sur la lutte contre les mauvaises herbes 2007, 315-325. Dijon, France.
41. Benichou P, Lebreton O. Prise en compte de la topographie pour la cartographie des champs pluviométriques statistiques. La Météorologie 1987, 7:23-34.
42. Austin MP. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol Model 2002, 157:101-118.
43. Thioulouse J, Chessel D. A method for reciprocal scaling of species tolerance and sample diversity. Ecology 1992, 73:670-680.
44. Shenbrot GI, Rogovin KA, Surov AV. Comparative analysis of spatial organization of desert lizard communities in Middle Asia and Mexico. Oikos 1991, 61:157-168.
45. Rao CR. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theor Popul Biol 1982, 21:24-43.
46. Rao CR. Rao's axiomatization of diversity measures. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 1986, 614-617. New York: Wiley, Kotz S, Johnson NL.
47. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dolédec S, Olivier JM. ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Stat Comput 1997, 7:75-83.
48. Dolédec S, Chessel D, Gimaret-Carpentier C. Niche separation in communty analysis: a new method. Ecology 2000, 81:2914-2927.
49. Dufrêne M, Legendre P. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 1997, 67:345-366.
50. Devineau JL. Generalist versus specialist: a contrasted sociology of woody and herbaceous species in a fallow-land rotation system in the West African savanna (Bondoukuy, Western Burkina Faso). Phytocoenologia 2005, 35:53-77.
51. Brisse H, de Ruffray P, Grandjouan G, Hoff M. The phytosociological database 'SOPHY'. Part I: Calibration of indicator plants. Part II: Socio-ecological classification of the relevés. European vegetation survey. Annali di Botanica 1995, 53:177-223.
52. Barralis G. Répartition et densité des principales mauvaises herbes en France 1977, Paris: INRA - AFPP.
53. Alard D, Poudevigne I. Factors controlling plant diversity in a rural landscape: a functional approach. Landscape and Urban Plan 1999, 46:29-39.
54. Gregory RD, Gaston KJ. Explanations of commonness and rarity in British breeding birds: separating resource use and resource availability. Oikos 2000, 88:515-526.
55. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Midgley G, Lavergne S, Rebelo T. Relating plant traits and species distributions along bioclimatic gradients for 88 Leucadendron taxa. Ecology 2004, 85:1688-1699.