Transporting Pedagogy: Implementing the Project Approach in Two First-Grade Classrooms

Journal of Advanced Academics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 530-564

  Hertzog, Nancy B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956473170     PISSN: 1932202X     EISSN: 21629536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4219/jaa-2007-559     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bloom S. H., Ham S., Melton L., O'Brien I., (2001). Evaluating the Accelerated Schools approach: A look at early implementation and impacts on achievement in eight elementary schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED460971)
2. Brandt R., (1998). Powerful learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
3. Brown D. R., (1999, August, 22). Achievement on the rise at Valeska Hinton Center. Journal Star, pp. A1, A21
4. Chen J., Krechevsky M., Viens J., (1998). Building on children's strengths: The experience of Project Spectrum. New York: Teachers College Press
5. Dettmer P., Landrum M., (1998). Staff development. The key to effective gifted education programs. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
6. Dewey J., (2001). The school and society & the child and the curriculum. Mineola, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1915)
7. Edwards C. P., Gandini L., Forman G., (1993). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach to education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
8. Fullan M., (1991). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press
9. Fullan M., (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press
10. Gardner H., (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books
11. Glesne C., Peshkin A., (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman
12. Helm J., Beneke S., Steinheimer K., (1998). Windows on learning: Documenting young children's work. New York: Teachers College Press
13. Hertzog N. B., (1998). Open-ended activities: Differentiation through learner responses. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 212–227
14. Hertzog N. B., (2005). Equity and access: Creating general education classrooms responsive to potential. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 213–257
15. Johnsen S. K., Ryser G., (1996). An overview of effective practices with gifted students in general-education settings. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 379–404
16. Katz L. G., Chard S. C., (2000). Engaging children's minds: The project approach. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
17. Kohn A., (1999). The schools our children deserve. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
18. Lincoln Y. S., Guba E. G., (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
19. Marcon R. A., (1992). Differential effects of three preschool models of inner-city 4-year-olds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 517–530
20. Marcon R. A., (1995, April). Differential effects of preschool models on inner-city children: The “class of 2000” transitions from third to fourth grade. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis, IN
21. Renzulli J. S., (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
22. Saracho O. N., (1993). Preparing teachers for early childhood programs in the United States. In Spodek B., (Ed.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 412–426). New York: Macmillan
23. U.S. Department of Education. (1996, May). Rethinking professional development. Improving America's schools: Newsletter on issues in school reform. Retrieved November 29, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/IASA/newsletters/profdev/pt1.html