Novel polyurethanes with interconnected porous structure induce in vivo tissue remodeling and accompanied vascularization

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 198-208

  Jovanovic, D ^a,b   Engels, G E ^a   Plantinga, J A ^b   Bruinsma, M ^a   Van Oeveren, W ^b   Schouten, A J ^a   Van Luyn, M J A ^b   Harmsen, M C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

butyrolactone; Biocompatibility; Degradation; Polyurethanes; Tissue remodeling

Indexed keywords

BUTYROLACTONES; CAPROLACTONE; COMONOMERS; D , L-LACTIDE; FOAM MORPHOLOGY; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; INTERCONNECTED PORES; INTERCONNECTED POROUS STRUCTURE; POLYESTERURETHANES; POROUS SCAFFOLD; POROUS STRUCTURES; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; ROBUST METHODS; SOFT TISSUE; TISSUE IN-GROWTH; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE REMODELING; TISSUE RESPONSE; VASCULARIZATION;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; DEGRADATION; ESTERS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MICROPHASE SEPARATION; POLYURETHANES; SCAFFOLDS; TISSUE;

TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BUTYROLACTONE; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYLACTIDE; POLYURETHAN; 1,4 BUTANEDIISOCYANATE; COMPLEMENT COMPONENT C5; ENDOTOXIN; GAMMA BUTYROLACTONE; POLYGLACTIN; THROMBIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADATION; CELL COUNT; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MACROPHAGE; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHASE SEPARATION; RAT; STROMA; TISSUE GROWTH; TISSUE REACTION; TISSUE REGENERATION; VASCULARIZATION; BIODEGRADABILITY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FOAM; HEMOLYSIS; MITOCHONDRION; POROSITY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOXICITY TESTING; YOUNG MODULUS; ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL; CELL DEATH; CHEMISTRY; CRYSTALLIZATION; DRUG EFFECT; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SWINE; SYNTHESIS; TISSUE ENGINEERING; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; CELL DEATH; CRYSTALLIZATION; ENDOTOXINS; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; POLYURETHANES; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; SUS SCROFA; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 77956470887     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32817     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Jagur-Grodzinski J. Polymers for tissue engineering, medical devices, and regenerative medicine. Concise general review of recent studies. Polym Adv Technol 2006;17:395-418.
2. Conrad C, Huss R. Adult stem cell lines in regenerative medicine and reconstructive surgery. J Surg Res 2005;124:201-208.
3. Rahaman MN, Mao JJ. Stem cell-based composite tissue constructs for regenerative medicine. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005;91:261-284.
4. Atala A. Engineering tissues, organs and cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2007;1:83-96.
5. Battiston B, Geuna S, Ferrero M, Tos P. Nerve repair by means of tubularization: Literature review and personal clinical experience comparing biological and synthetic conduits for sensory nerve repair. Microsurgery 2005;25:258-267.
6. Chen Q-Z, Harding SE, Ali NN, Lyon AR, Boccaccini AR. Biomaterials in cardiac tissue engineering: ten years of research survey. Mater Sci Eng R 2008;59:1-37.
7. Venkatraman S, Boey F, Lao LL. Implanted cardiovascular polymers: Natural, synthetic and bio-inspired. Prog Polym Sci 2008;33:853-874.
8. Beumer GJ, van Blitterswijk CA, Ponec M. Biocompatibility of a biodegradable matrix used as a skin substitute: An in vivo evaluation. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:545-552. (Pubitemid 24132524)
9. Falco EE, Roth JS, Fisher JP. Skeletal muscle tissue engineering approaches to abdominal wall hernia repair. Birth Def Res C 2009;84:315-321.
10. Hollister SJ. Scaffold design and manufacturing: From concept to clinic. Adv Mater 2009;21:1-13.
11. Brauker JH, Carr-Brendel VE, Martinson LA, Crudele J, Johnston WD, Jonhson RC. Neovascularization of synthetic membranes directed by membrane microarchitecture. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1517-1524.
12. Zdrahala RJ, Zdrahala IJ. Biomedical applications of polyurethanes: A review of past promises, present realities, and a vibrant future. J Biomater Appl 1999;14:67-90.
13. Available at: http://www.orteq.com/index.php. Accessed on February 2010.
14. Lamba NMK, Woodhouse KA, Cooper SL. Polyurethanes in Biomedical Applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1998.
15. Heijkants RGJC, van Calck RV, de Groot JH, Pennings AJ, Schouten AJ. Design, synthesis and properties of a degradable polyurethane scaffold for meniscus regeneration. J Biomater Sci Mater Med 2004;15:423-427.
16. Heijkants RGJC. Polyurethane Scaffolds as Meniscus Reconstruction Materials. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 2004. http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/270337644.
17. van Tienen TG. In Vivo Tissue Engineering of the Knee Joint Meniscus. Nijmegen: University Medical Centre Nijmegen; 2004.
18. de Groot JH, Vrijer R, Pennings AJ, Klompmaker J, Veth RPH, Jansen HWB. Use of porous polyurethanes for meniscal reconstruction and meniscal prosthesis. Biomaterials 1996;17:163-173.
19. Böstman O, Pihlajamäki HK, Partio EK, Rokkanen PU. Clinical biocompatibility and degradation of polylevolactide screws in the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;320:101-109.
20. Bergsma JE, Bruin WC, Rozema FR, Bos RRM. Late degradation tissue response to poly(L-lactide) bone plates and screws. Biomaterials 1995;16:25-31.
21. Pitt CG, Gratzl MM, Kimmel GL, Surles J, Schindler A. Aliphatic polyesters II. The degradation of poly(DL-lactide), poly(e-caprolactone), and their copolymers in vivo. Biomaterials 1981;2:215-220.
22. Lin W-J. Comparison of thermal characteristics and degradation properties of e-caprolactone copolymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;47:420-423. (Pubitemid 29461430)
23. Heijkants RGJC, van Calck RV, van Tienen TG, de Groot JH, Buma P, Pennings AJ, Veth RPH, Schouten AJ. Uncatalyzed synthesis, thermal and mechanical properties of polyurethanes based on poly(e-caprolactone) and 1,4-butanediisocyanate with uniform hard segment. Biomaterials 2005;26:4219-4228.
24. Harboe M. A method for determination of haemoglobin in plasma by near-ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1959;11:66-70.
25. Saiyasombat W, Molloy R, Nicholson TM, Johnson AF, Ward IM, Poshyachinda S. Ring strain and polymerizability of cyclic esters. Polymer 1998;39:5581-5585.
26. Gunatillake PA, Adhikari R. Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 2003;5:1-16. (Pubitemid 38957397)
27. Kannan RY, Salacinski HJ, Sales K, Butler P, Saifalian AM. The roles of tissue engineering and vascularization in the development of micro-vascular networks: A review. Biomaterials 2005;26:1857-1875.
28. Kim SH, Ha HJ, Ko YK, Yoon SJ. Correlation of proliferation, morphology, and biological responses of fibroblasts on the LDPE with different surface wettability. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2007;18:609-622.
29. Hunt JA, Meijs G, Williams DF. Hydrophobicity of polymers and soft tissue responses: A qualitative analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:542-549.
30. Christenson EM, Dadsetan M, Anderson JM, Hiltner A. Biostability and macrophage-mediated foreign body reaction of silicon-modified polyurethanes. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:141-155.
31. Hilborn J, Bjursten LM. A new and evolving paradigm for biocompatibility. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2007;1:110-119.
32. Santerre JP, Woodhouse KA, Laroche G, Labow RS. Understanding the biodegradation of polyurethanes: From classical implants to tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials 2005;26:7457-7470. (Pubitemid 41133597)
33. Santerre JP, Labow RS, Duguay DG, Erfle D, Adams GA. Biodegradation evaluation of polyether and polyester-urethanes with oxidative and hydrolytic enzymes. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:1187-1199.