Should the size threshold for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair be lowered in the endovascular era? No

Angiology

Volumn 61, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 620-623

  Avgerinos, Efthimios D ^a   Katsargyris, Athanasios ^b   Klonaris, Christos ^b   Papapetrou, Anastasios ^a   Moulakakis, Konstantinos ^a   Liapis, Christos D ^a  

^a NATIONAL AND KAPODISTRIAN UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

Author keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm; aneurysm diameter; aneurysm size; endovascular

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DESCENDING AORTA SURGERY; HUMAN; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SURGICAL MORTALITY; ABDOMINAL AORTA; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; HOSPITAL; LESIONS AND DEFECTS; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HOSPITALS, GROUP PRACTICE; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956464733     PISSN: 00033197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0003319710375085     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affair Cooperative Study Group. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002 ; 346 (19). 1437-1444.
2. Powell JT, Brown LC, Forbes JF, et al. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br J Surg. 2007 ; 94 (6). 702-708.
3. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet. 1998 ;352(9141): 1649-1655.
4. United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002 ; 346 (19). 1445-1452.
5. Cronenwett JL, Johnston KW The United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial: implications for surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1999 ; 29 (1). 191-194.
6. Patel MS, Brown DA, Wilson SE Relevance of the ADAM and UK Small Aneurysm trial data in the age of endovascular aneurysm repair. Arch Surg. 2009 ; 144 (9). 806-810.
7. Lall P., Gloviczki P., Agarwal G., et al. Comparison of EVAR and open repair in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms: can we predict results of the pivotal trial? J Vasc Surg. 2009 ; 49 (1). 52-59.
8. LeCroy CJ, Passman MA, Taylor SM, Patterson MA, Combs BR, Jordan WD Jr. Should endovascular repair be used for small abdominal aortic aneurysms ? Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 ; 42 (2). 113-119.
9. Ouriel K., Srivastava SD, Sarac TP, et al. Disparate outcome after endovascular treatment of small versus large abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2003 ; 37 (6). 1206-1212.
10. Peppelenbosch N., Buth J., Harris PL, van Marrewijk C., Fransen G. ; Eurostar Collaborators. Diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm and outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair: does size matter? A report from eurostar. J Vasc Surg. 2004 ; 39 (2). 288-297.
11. Zarins CK, Crabtree T., Bloch DA, Arko FR, Ouriel K., White RA Endovascular aneurysm repair at 5 years: does aneurysm diameter predict outcome ? J Vasc Surg. 2006 ; 44 (5). 920-929.
12. Golledge J., Parr A., Boult M., Maddern G., Fitridge R. The outcome of endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg. 2007 ; 245 (2). 326-333.
13. De Rango P., Cao P., Parlani G., Verzini F., Brambilla D. Outcome after endografting in small and large abdominal aortic aneurysms: a metanalysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 ; 35 (2). 162-172.
14. Brewster DC, Jones JE, Chung TK, et al. Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade. Ann Surg. 2006 ; 244 (3). 426-438.
15. Bui H., Lujan R., Nguyen A., et al. Impact of endoluminal treatment on small abdominal aortic aneurysm: aneurysm sac regression and secondary interventions with 5-years of follow-up. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2007 ; 41 (4). 294-300.
16. Welborn MB 3rd, Yau FS, Modrall JG, et al. Endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a paradigm shift ? Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005 ; 39 (5). 381-391.
17. Armon MP, Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, Gregson RH, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR Influence of abdominal aortic aneurysm size on the feasibility of endovascular repair. J Endovasc Surg. 1997 ; 4 (3). 279-283.
18. Yau FS, Rosero EB, Clagett GP, et al. Surveillance of small aortic aneurysms does not alter anatomic suitability for endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2007 ; 45 (1). 96-100.
19. Prinssen M., Verhoeven EL, Buth J., et al. Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group. A randomised trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004 ; 351 (16). 1607-1618.
20. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG ; EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004 ; 364 (9437). 843-848.
21. Liapis CD, Avgerinos ED Re-defining outcome measurements in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: mortality rates are just not enough. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 ; 22 (3). 494-495.
22. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 ; 365 (9478). 2179-2186.
23. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 ; 365 (9478). 2187-2192.
24. Aljabri B., Al Wahaibi K., Abner D., et al. Patient-reported quality of life after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: a prospective comparison of endovascular and open repair. J Vasc Surg. 2006 ; 44 (6). 1182-1187.
25. Young KC, Awad NA, Johansson M., Gillespie D., Singh MJ, Illig KA Cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair based on aneurysm size. J Vasc Surg. 2010 ; 51 (1). 27-32.
26. Cao P. CAESAR Trial Collaborators. Comparison of surveillance vs Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR) trial: study design and progress. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005 ; 30 (3). 245-251.
27. Ouriel K. Randomized clinical trials of endovascular repair versus surveillance for treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2009 ; 16 (suppl I). 194-105.
28. Chaikof EL, Brewster DC, Dalman RL, et al. SVS practice guidelines for the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: executive summary. J Vasc Surg. 2009 ; 50 (4). 880-896.