CMOL implementation of spiking neurons and spike-timing dependent plasticity

International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 357-372

  Afifi, Ahmad ^a   Ayatollahi, Ahmad ^a   Raissi, Farshid ^b  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b K N TOOSI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

CMOL; nanoelectronics; neuromorphic networks; spiking neurons; STDP learning

Indexed keywords

BASIC BUILDING BLOCK; CMOL; CMOL ARCHITECTURE; DYNAMIC LEARNING; FEED-FORWARD NETWORK; LEARNING ABILITIES; LEARNING METHODS; LOCAL INFORMATION; NEUROMORPHIC NETWORKS; SIMULATION RESULT; SPIKE-TIMING; SPIKE-TIMING-DEPENDENT PLASTICITY; SPIKING NEURAL NETWORKS; SPIKING NEURON; SPIKING NEURONS; STDP LEARNING; SYNCHRONY DETECTION;

NANOELECTRONICS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; TOPOLOGY;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 77956458306     PISSN: 00989886     EISSN: 1097007X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cta.638     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Strukov DB, Likharev KK,. CMOL: devices, circuits, and architectures. In Introducing Molecular Electronics., Cuniberti G, et al. (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2005; 447-477. (Pubitemid 44445609)
2. Snider G,. Self-organized computation with unreliable, memristive nanodevices. Nanotechnology 2007; 18: 365202.
3. DeHon A,. Nanowire-based programmable architectures. ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems 2005; 1: 109-162.
4. Snider G, Williams RS,. Nano/CMOS architectures using a field-programmable nanowire interconnect. Nanotechnology 2007; 18:035204.
5. Strukov DB, Likharev KK,. CMOL FPGA: a reconfigurable architecture for hybrid digital circuits with two-terminal nanodevices. Nanotechnology 2005; 16: 888-900. (Pubitemid 40666599)
6. Masoumi M, Raissi F, Ahmadian M, Keshavarzi P,. Design and evaluation of basic standard encryption algorithm modules using nanosized complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor-molecular circuits. Nanotechnology 2006; 17: 89-99. (Pubitemid 41808022)
7. Strukov D, Likharev KK,. Prospects for terabit-scale nanoelectronic memories. Nanotechnology 2005; 16: 137-148. (Pubitemid 40121546)
8. Turel O, Lee JH, Ma X, Likharev KK,. Neuromorphic architectures for nanoelectronic circuits. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Application 2004; 32: 277-302.
9. Lee JH, Likharev KK,. Defect-tolerant nanoelectronic pattern classifiers. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 2007; 35: 239-264. (Pubitemid 46848192)
10. Wagner R, Molnar AL, Werblin FS,. Analysis of the interaction between the retinal ON and OFF channels using CNN-UM models. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 2009; 37: 87-108.
11. Rák A, Soõs GB, Cserey Gy,. Stochastic bitstream-based CNN and its implementation on FPGA. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 2009; 37 (4): 587-612.
12. Zhang W, Wu NJ,. CMOL-based Cellular Neural Networks and Parallel Processor for Future Image processing. Eighth IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, (NANO '08), Arlington, 2008; 737-740.
13. Indiveri G, Chicca E, Douglas R,. A VLSI array of low-power spiking neurons and bistable synapses with spike-timing dependent plasticity. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 2006; 17: 211-221. (Pubitemid 43272460)
14. Hoekstra J,. Towards a circuit theory for metallic single-electron tunnelling devices. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 2007; 35: 213-238. (Pubitemid 46850669)
15. Csurgay AI,. On circuit models for quantum-classical networks. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 2007; 35 (5-6): 471-484. (Pubitemid 47485633)
16. Gao CJ, Hammerstrom D,. Cortical models onto CMOL and CMOS-architectures and performance/price. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 2007; 54: 2502-2515.
17. Snider GS,. Spike-timing-dependent learning in memris-tive nanodevices. IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures, Anaheim, CA, 2008; 85-92.
18. Afifi A, Ayatollahi A, Raissi F,. STDP implemen-tation using memristive nanodevice in CMOS-Nano neuromorphic networks. IEICE Electronics Express 2009; 6 (3): 148-153.
19. Gorchetchnikov A, Versace M, Hasselmo ME,. A model of STDP based on spatially and temporally local information: derivation and combination with gated decay. Neural Networks 2005; 18: 458-466. (Pubitemid 43186564)
20. Maass W,. Networks of spiking neurons: the third generation of neural network models. Neural Networks 1997; 10: 1659-1671. (Pubitemid 28057273)
21. Gerstner W, Kistler W,. Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002.
22. Maass W, Markram H,. On the computational power of recurrent circuits of spiking neurons. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 2004; 69: 593-616.
23. Ravinuthula V, Garg V, Harris JG, Fortes JAB,. Time-mode circuits for analog computation. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 2009; 37 (5): 631-659.
24. Izhikevich EM,. Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Network 2004; 15: 1063-1070.
25. Sasaki M, Morie T, Iwata A,. A VLSI spiking feedback neural network with negative thresholding and its application to associative memory. IEICE Transactions on Electronics 2006; E89-C: 1637-1644. (Pubitemid 44934379)
26. Chicca E, Badoni D, Dante V, Andreagiovanni M, Salina G, Carota L, Fusi S, Del Giudice P,. A VLSI recurrent network of integrate-and-fire neurons connected by plastic synapses with long-term memory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 2003; 14: 1297-1307.
27. Hebb DO,. The Organization of Behavior. Reprinted in Neurocomputing, Foundations of Research 1949. Wiley, MIT Press: New York, Cambridge, MA, 1988; 60-78.
28. Grossberg S,. Classical and instrumental conditioning by neural networks. Progress in Theoretical Biology 1974; 3: 51-141.
29. Debanne D, Gahwiler BH, Thompson SM,. Long-term synaptic plasticity between pairs of individual CA3 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slice cultures. Journal of Physiology 1998; 507: 237-247. (Pubitemid 28102688)
30. Kistler WM, van Hemmen JL,. Modeling synaptic plasticity in conjunction with the timing of pre- and post-synaptic action potentials. Neural Computation 2000; 12: 385-405.
31. Song S, Miller KD, Abbott LF,. Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neuroscience 2000; 3: 919-926.
32. Bi GQ, Poo MM,. Activity-induced synaptic modifi-cations in hippocampal culture: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength and cell type. Journal of Neuroscience 1998; 18: 10464-10472.
33. Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B,. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic AP's and EPSPs. Science 1997; 275: 213-215. (Pubitemid 27034762)
34. Vogelstein RJ, Tenore F, Philipp R, Adlerstein MS, Goldberg DH, Cauwenberghs G,. Spike timing-dependent plasticity in the address domain. In Proceedings of the NIPS'03., Becker S, et al. (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge MA, 2003; 15.
35. Saudargiene A, Porr B, Worgotter F,. How the shape of pre- and post-synaptic signals can influence STDP: a biophysical model. Neural Computation 2004; 16: 595-625. (Pubitemid 38157017)
36. Turel O, Likharev KK,. CrossNets: possible neuromorphic networks based on nanoscale components. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 2003; 31: 37-53.
37. Lee JH, Likharev KK,. CMOL crossNets as pattern classifiers. IWANN 2005, Spain, 2005; 446-454. (Pubitemid 41343010)
38. Gerstner W, Kempter R, van Hemmen JL, Wagner H,. Hebbian learning of pulse timing in the Barn Owl auditory system. In Pulsed Neural Networks. Chapter 14, Maass W, Bishop CM, (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1999; 353-377.
39. Chen A, Haddad S, Wu YC, Fang TN, Lan Z, Avanzino S, Pangrle S, Buynoski M, Rathor M, Cai W, Tripsas N, Bill C, VanBuskirk M, Taguchi M,. Non-volatile resistive switching for advanced memory applications. International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM'05 Technical Digest) 2005; 746-749. (Pubitemid 46370958)
40. Izhikevich EM, Desai NS,. Relating STDP to BCM. Neural Computation 2003; 15: 1511-1523. (Pubitemid 37035559)
41. Mozsary A, Chung J, Roska T,. Function-in-layout: a demonstration with bio-inspired hyperacuity chip. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications 2007; 35: 149-164. (Pubitemid 46506959)