Involuntary but not voluntary orienting contributes to a disengage deficit in visual neglect

Cortex

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1149-1164

  Olk, Bettina ^a   Hildebrandt, Helmut ^b,c   Kingstone, Alan ^d  

^a JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM BREMEN OST   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Disengagement; Extinction; Neglect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN DAMAGE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISENGAGE DEFICIT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORIENTATION; PREDICTION; RESPONSE TIME; VALIDITY; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURIES; CUES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; VOLITION;

EID: 77956454178     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bartolomeo P., Siéroff E., Decaix C., Chokron S. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: The effects of the strategic set. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 137:432-444.
2. Bartolomeo P., Chokron S. Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2002, 26:217-234.
3. Berlucchi G., Chelazzi L., Tassinari G. Volitional covert orienting to a peripheral cue does not suppress cue-induced inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:648-663.
4. Bonato M., Priftis K., Marenzi R., Zorzi M. Normal and impaired reflexive orienting of attention following central non-predictive cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:745-759.
5. Chica A.B., Lupiáñez J. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: An inhibition of return study. Brain Research 2009, 1278:75-85.
6. Chica A.B., Lupiáñez J., Bartolomeo P. Dissociating inhibition of return from the endogenous orienting of spatial attention: Evidence from detection and discrimination tasks. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:1015-1034.
7. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:201-215.
8. Corbetta M., Kincade M.J., Lewis C., Snyder A.Z., Sapir A. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8:1603-1610.
9. Corbetta M., Patel G., Shulman G.L. The reorienting system of the human brain: From environment to theory of mind. Neuron 2008, 58:306-324.
10. Danziger S., Kingstone A. Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon. Perception and Psychophysics 1999, 61:1024-1037.
11. Danziger S., Kingstone A., Rafal R.D. Orienting to extinguished signals in hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science 1998, 9:119-123.
12. D'Erme P., Robertson I., Bartolomeo P., Daniele A., Gainotti G. Early rightwards orienting of attention on simple reaction time performance in patients with left-sided neglect. Neuropsychologia 1992, 30:989-1000.
13. Eimer M. Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology 1997, 46:67-71.
14. Farah M.J., Wong A.B., Monheit A., Morrow L.A. Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal?. Neuropsychologia 1989, 27:461-470.
15. Frischen A., Tipper S.P. Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention, and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 2004, 133:516-533.
16. Frischen A., Smilek D., Eastwood J.D., Tipper S.P. Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: The roles of time course and fixation cue. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:881-895.
17. Gainotti G., D'Erme P., Bartolomeo P. Early orientation of attention towards the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1991, 54:1082-1089.
18. Gibson B.S., Bryant T.A. Variation in cue duration reveals top-down modulation of involuntary orienting to uninformative symbolic cues. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 6:749-758.
19. Gibson B.S., Kingstone A. Visual attention and the semantics of space: Beyond central and peripheral cues. Psychological Science 2006, 17:626-627.
20. Harvey M., Olk B., Muir K., Gilchrist I.D. Manual responses and saccades in chronic and recovered hemispatial neglect: A study using visual search. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:705-717.
21. Hildebrandt H. Sensitivität des TAP Neglekttests bei der Erfassung postchiasmatischer Gesichtfeldausfälle - eine Vergleichsstudie zur Goldmannperimetrie. Neurological Rehabilitation 2006, 12:270-277.
22. He B.J., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Epstein A., Shulman G.L., Corbetta M. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 2007, 53:905-918.
23. Hommel B., Pratt J., Colzato L., Godijn R. Symbolic control of visual attention. Psychological Science 2001, 12:360-365.
24. Hornak J. Ocular exploration in the dark by patients with visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 1992, 30:547-552.
25. Jonides J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. Attention & Performance IX 1981, 187-203. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J.B. Long, A.D. Baddeley (Eds.).
26. Kinsbourne M. Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect 1987, 69-86. Elsevier, Amsterdam. M. Jeannerod (Ed.).
27. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:138-147.
28. Klein R.M. On the control of visual orienting. Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention 2004, 29-44. Guilford Press, New York. M.I. Posner (Ed.).
29. Kuhn G., Kingstone A. Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 2009, 71:314-327.
30. Làdavas E., Carletti M., Gori G. Automatic and voluntary orienting of attention in patients with visual neglect: Horizontal and vertical dimensions. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:1195-1208.
31. Losier B.J., Klein R.M. A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2001, 25:1-13.
32. Lupiáñez J., Decaix C., Siéroff E., Chokron S., Milliken B., Bartolomeo P. Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: Inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 159:447-457.
33. Lupiáñez J., Milliken B. Exogenous cuing effects and the attentional set for integrating versus differentiating information. The Journal of General Psychology 1999, 126:392-418.
34. Mark V.W., Kooistra C.A., Heilman K.M. Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli. Neurology 1988, 38:1207-1211.
35. McKee D., Christie J., Klein R. On the uniqueness of attentional capture by uninformative gaze cues: Facilitation interacts with the Simon effect and is rarely followed by IOR. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 61:293-303.
36. Nijboer T.C.W., McIntosh R.D., Nys G.M.S., Dijkerman H.C., Milner A.D. Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect. NeuroReport 2007, 19:293-298.
37. Olk B., Cameron B., Kingstone A. Enhanced orienting effects: Evidence for an interaction principle. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:979-1000.
38. Olk B., Harvey M. Effects of visible and invisible cueing on line bisection and landmark performance in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2000, 40:282-290.
39. Olk B., Harvey M. Characterizing exploration behavior in spatial neglect: Omissions and repetitive search. Brain Research 2006, 1118:106-115.
40. Olk B., Harvey M., Gilchrist I.D. First saccades reveal biases in recovered neglect. Neurocase 2002, 8:306-313.
41. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1980, 32:3-25.
42. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of visual orienting. Attention & Performance X 1984, 531-556. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Bouma, D.G. Bowhuis (Eds.).
43. Posner M.I., Walker J.A., Friedrich F.J., Rafal R.D. Effects of parietal lobe injury on covert orienting of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience 1984, 4:1863-1874.
44. Rastelli F., Funes M.J., Lupiáñez J., Duret C., Bartolomeo P. Left visual neglect: Is the disengage deficit space- or object-based?. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 187:439-446.
45. Ristic J., Kingstone A. Attention to arrows. Pointing to a new direction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1921-1930.
46. Ristic J., Friesen C.K., Kingstone A. Are eyes special? It depends on how you look at it. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:507-513.
47. Siéroff E., Decaix C., Chokron S., Bartolomeo P. Impaired orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect: A componential analysis. Neuropsychology 2007, 21:94-113.
48. Smania N., Martini M.C., Gambina G., Tomelleri G., Palamara A., Natale E., et al. The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients. Brain 1998, 121:1759-1770.
49. Stenneken P., Van Eimeren L., Keller I., Jacobs A.M., Kerkhoff G. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect. Brain Research 2008, 1189:166-178.
50. Taylor T.L., Klein R. Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26:1639-1656.
51. Tipples J. Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:314-318.
52. Tipples J. Orienting to counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Perception and Psychophysics 2008, 70:77-87.
53. Vallar G., Perani D. The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right hemisphere stroke lesions: A clinical CT correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia 1986, 24:609-622.
54. Vecera S.P., Flevaris A.V. Attentional control parameters following parietal-lobe damage: Evidence from normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1189-1203.
55. Vivas A.B., Humpreys G.W., Fuentes L.J. Abnormal inhibition of return: A review and new data on patients with parietal lobe damage. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:1049-1064.
56. Wilson B.A., Cockburn J., Halligan P. Behavioral Inattention Test 1987, Thames Valley Test Company, Titchfield, Hampshire.
57. Zimmermann P., Fimm B. Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP) 1993, Psytest, Würselen (Germany).