Supporting the education evidence portal via text mining

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 368, Issue 1925, 2010, Pages 3829-3844

  Ananiadou, Sophia ^a,c   Thompson, Paul ^a   Thomas, James ^b   Mu, Tingting ^a   Oliver, Sandy ^b   Rickinson, Mark ^b   Sasaki, Yutaka ^a   Weissenbacher, Davy ^a   Mcnaught, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Document classification; Document clustering; Term extraction; Text mining

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DATA MINING; EDUCATION; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PORTALS; TEXT PROCESSING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION; AUTOMATIC CLUSTERING; AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION; DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION; DOCUMENT CLUSTERING; DRILL-DOWN; JOINT INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMITTEES; MULTIPLE RESOURCES; SEARCH RESULTS; TERM EXTRACTION; TEXT MINING; TOOLS AND METHODS; WEB INTERFACE; WORK PRACTICES;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 77956453962     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0152     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ananiadou, S. & Mcnaught, J. (eds) 2006 Text mining for biology and biomedicine. Boston, MA/London, UK: Artech House.
2. Ananiadou, S., Rea, B., Okazaki, N., Procter, R. & Thomas, J. 2009 Supporting systematic reviews using text mining. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 27, 509-523. (doi:10.1177/0894439309332293)
3. Bekkerman, R., El-Yaniv, R., Tishby, N. & Winter, Y. 2003 Distributional word clusters vs. words for text categorization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1183-1208. (doi:10.1162/153244303322753625)
4. Chalmers, I. 2003 Trying to do more good than harm in policy and practice: The role of rigorous, transparent, up-to-date evaluations. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Sci. 589, 22-40. (doi:10.1177/0002716203254762) (Pubitemid 37089332)
5. Dhillon, I. S., Mallela, S. & Kumar, R. 2003 A divisive information theoretic feature clustering algorithm for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1265-1287. (doi:10.1162/153244303322753661)
6. Frantzi, K., Ananiadou, S. & Mima, H. 2000 Automatic recognition of multi-word terms: The C-value/NC-value method. Int. J. Digital Libr. 3, 115-130. (doi:10.1007/s007999900023)
7. Gong, Y. & Liu, X. 2001 Generic text summarization using relevance measure and latent semantic analysis. In Proc. 24th Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. (eds D. H. Kraft, W. B. Croft, D. J. Harper & J. Zobel), pp. 19-25. New York, NY: ACM. (doi:10.1145/383952.383955)
8. Hatcher, E. & Gospodnetic, O. 2004 LUCENE in action. Greenwich, CT: Manning Publications Co.
9. Hearst, M. 1999 Untangling text data mining. In Proc. 37th Ann. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 1999) (eds R. Dale & K. Church), pp. 3-10. Morristown, NJ: ACL. (doi:10.3115/1034678.1034679)
10. Hearst, M. A. 2009 Search user interfaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Hey, T. & Hey, J. 2006 e-Science and its implications for the library community. Libr. Hi Tech. 24, 515-528. (doi:10.1108/07378830610715383) (Pubitemid 44817190)
12. ISO/IEC 9126-1. 2001 Software engineering -product quality -part 1: Quatlity model. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO/IEC.
13. Jiang, J. Y. & Lee, S. J. 2007 A weight-based feature extraction approach for text classification. In Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Innovative Computing, Information and Control, p. 164. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society (doi:10.1109/ICICIC.2007.109)
14. King, M. 2007 General principles of user-oriented evaluation. In Evaluation of text and speech systems (eds L. Dybkjær, H. Hemsen & W. Minker), pp. 125-161. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
15. Miyao, Y. & Tsujii, J. 2008 Feature forest models for probabilistic HPSG parsing. Comput. Linguist. 34, 35-80. (doi:10.1162/coli.2008.34.1.35)
16. Nobata, C., Cotter, P., Okazaki, N., Rea, B., Sasaki, Y., Tsuruoka, Y., Tsujii, J. & Ananiadou, S. 2008 Kleio: A knowledge-enriched information retrieval system for biology. In Proc. 31st Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. (eds S.-H. Myaeng, D. W. Oard, F. Sebastiani, T.-S. Chua & M.-K. Leong), pp. 787-788. New York, NY: ACM. (doi:10.1145/1390334.1390504)
17. Osinski, S., Stefanowski, J. & Weiss, D. 2004 LINGO: Search results clustering algorithm based on singular value decomposition. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Information Systems (IIPWM) (eds M. A. Klopotek, S. T. Wierzchon & K. Trojanowski), pp. 359-368. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.
18. Porter, M. 1997 An algorithm for suffix stripping. In Readings in information retrieval (eds K. Sparck Jones & P. Willett), pp. 313-316. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Sasaki, Y., Rea, B. & Ananiadou, S. 2009 Clinical text classification under the open and closed topic assumptions. Int. J. Data Min. Bioin. 3, 299-313. (doi:10.1504/IJDMB.2009.026703)
20. Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C. 2004 Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
21. Tsuruoka, Y., Tateishi, Y., Kim, J. D., Ohta, T., Mcnaught, J., Ananiadou, S. & Tsujii, J. 2005 Developing a robust part-of-speech tagger for biomedical text. In Advances in informatics, pp. 382-392. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
22. White, J. 2000 Toward an automated, task-based MT evaluation strategy. In Proc. Workshop on the Evaluation of Machine Translation, 3rd Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC) (eds B. Maegaard, M. King & E. Hovy). Paris, France: ELDA.