Incorporating passenger perceived service quality in airport ground access mode choice model

Transportmetrica

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 3-17

  Tam, Mei Ling ^a   Lam, William H K ^b   Lo, Hing Po ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Air passenger behaviour; Discrete choice model; Ground access mode choice; Hong Kong international airport; Perceived service quality; Structural equation modelling

Indexed keywords

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

ACCESS MODE; AIR PASSENGERS; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL - AIRPORT; PERCEIVED SERVICE QUALITIES; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING;

AIRPORTS;

EID: 77956419699     PISSN: 18128602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/18128600902929583     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Airports Council International. 2005. ACI passenger and freight forecasts 2005-2020 - flag shortage of airport capacity. Airports Council International Press Releases. Available from: http:// www.airports.org
2. Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
3. Boomsma, A., 1982. The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In: K.G. Joreskog and H. Wold, eds. Systems under indirect observation: causality, structure, prediction, part I. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 149-173.
4. Brownstone, D. and Small, K.A., 2005. Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations. Transportation Research, 39A (4), 279-293.
5. Choo, S. and Mokhtarian, P.L., 2007. Telecommunications and travel demand and supply: aggregate structural equation models for the US. Transportation Research, 41A (1), 4-18.
6. Garrow, L.A., Koppelman, F.S., and Nelson, B.L., 2005. Efficient estimation of nested logit models using choice-based samples. In: H.S. Mahmassani, ed. Transportation and traffic theory: flow, dynamics and human interaction: proceedings of the sixteenth international symposium on transportation and traffic theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 525-544.
7. Golob, T.F., 2000. A simultansous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation. Transportation Research, 34B (5), 355-376.
8. Greene, W.H., 2002. LIMDEP Version 8.0 Reference Guide. New York: Econometric Software, Inc.
9. Harvey, G., 1986. Study of airport access mode choice. Journal of Transportation Engineering - ASCE, 112 (5), 525-545.
10. Hensher, D.A., 2007. Some insights into the key influences on trip-chaining activity and public transport use of seniors and the elderly. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1 (1),53-68.
11. Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department. 2007. Civil Aviation Department Annual Report 2006/2007. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department.
12. Hong Kong Transport Department. 2003. Travel characteristics study 2002 - feasibility study. Technical Report - Main Text (Volume 1 of 2), Hong Kong Transport Department, Hong Kong.
13. Jaccard, J. and Wan, C.K., 1996. LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. London: SAGE Publications.
14. Joreskog, K. and Sorbom, D., 1993. LISREL 8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
15. Kim, S., 2003. Analysis of elderly mobility by structural equation modeling. Transportation Research Record, 1854, 81-89.
16. Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L., and Laidet, L., 1997. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, 24 (2), 125-158.
17. McFadden, D., 1986. The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing Science, 5 (4), 275-297.
18. Monteiro, A.B.F. and Hansen, M., 1996. Improvements to airport ground access and behavior of multiple airport system: BART extension to San Francisco International Airport. Transportation Research Record, 1562, 38-47.
19. Morikawa, T., Ben-Akiva, M., and McFadden, D., 2002. Discrete choice models incorporating revealed preferences and psychometric data. In: P.H. Franses and A.L. Montgomery, eds. Econometric models in marketing. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd, 29-55.
20. Muthen, B.O., 1989. Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54 (4), 557-585.
21. Pels, E., Nijkamp, P., and Rietveld, P., 2003. Access to and competition between airports: a case study for the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research, 37A (1), 71-83.
22. Sasaki, K., Morikawa, T., and Kawakami, S., 1999. A discrete choice model with taste heterogeneity using SP, RP and attribute importance ratings. In: H. Meersman, E. van de Voorde, and W. Winkelmans, eds. World transport research: proceedings of the 8th world conference on transport research, July 1998, Belgium. Volume 3: Transport modelling/assessment. Amsterdam: Pergamon, 39-49
23. Tam, M.L., 2005. Analysis on safety margins for airport ground access journeys. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of Hong Kong Society for transportation studies, Hong Kong, 348-357.
24. Tam, M.L., Lam, W.H.K., and Lo, H.P., 2008. Modeling air passenger travel behavior for airport ground access mode choices. Transportmetrica, 4 (2), 135-153.
25. Tam, M.L., Tam, M.L., and Lam, W.H.K., 2005. Analysis of airport access mode choice: a case study in Hong Kong. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 708-723.
26. Wang, D. and Law, F.Y.T., 2007. Impacts of information and communication technologies (ICT) on time use and travel behavior: a structural equations analysis. Transportation, 34 (4), 513-527.
27. Yang, H., et al., 2000. A macroscopic taxi model for passenger demand, taxi utilisation and level of services. Transportation, 27 (3), 317-340.
28. Zeithaml, A.V., Parasuraman, A., and Berry, L.L., 1990. Delivering quality service: balancing customer perceptions and expectations. New York: The Free Press.