Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a Modified Liquid-Based Cytology using OralCDx ® Brush in early detection of oral potentially malignant lesions and oral cancer

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Delavarian, Zahra ^a   Mohtasham, Nooshin ^a   Mosannen Mozaffari, Pegah ^a   Pakfetrat, Atessa ^a   Shakeri, Mohammad Taghi ^b   Ghafoorian Maddah, Rasoul ^c  

^a MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Brush biopsy; Diagnostic value; Dysplasia; Liquid based cytology; Oral cancer; Precancerous conditions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DYSPLASIA; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GRANULAR CELL TUMOR; HUMAN; LEUKOPLAKIA; LICHEN PLANUS; LICHENOID; LIQUID BASED CYTOLOGY; MALE; MOUTH CANCER; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; SCALPEL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR BIOPSY; VERRUCOUS CARCINOMA;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956413463     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e671     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mehrotra R, Gupta A, Singh M, Ibrahim R. Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant or malignant oral lesions. Mol Cancer. 2006;5:11.
2. Fedele S. Diagnostic aids in the screening of oral cancer. Head Neck Oncol. 2009;1:5.
3. Acha A, Ruesga MT, Rodríguez MJ, Martínez de Pancorbo MA, Aguirre JM. Applications of the oral scraped (exfoliative) cytology in oral cancer and precancer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10:95-102.
4. Lingen MW, Kalmar JR, Karrison T, Speight PM. Critical evaluation of diagnostic aids for the detection of oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2008;44:10-22. (Pubitemid 350258631)
5. Patton LL, Epstein JB, Kerr AR. Adjunctive techniques for oral cancer examination and lesion diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:896-905.
6. Trullenque-Eriksson A, Muñoz-Corcuera M, Campo-Trapero J, Cano-Sánchez J, Bascones-Martínez A. Analysis of new diagnostic methods in suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:E210-6.
7. Svirsky JA, Burns JC, Carpenter WM, Cohen DM, Bhattacharyya I, Fantasia JE, et al. Comparison of computer-assisted brush biopsy results with follow up scalpel biopsy and histology. Gen Dent. 2002;50:500-3.
8. Mehrotra R, Singh MK, Pandya S, Singh M. The use of an oral brush biopsy without computer-assisted analysis in the evaluation of oral lesions: a study of 94 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:246-53.
9. Scheifele C, Schmidt-Westhausen AM, Dietrich T, Reichart PA. The sensitivity and specificity of the OralCDx technique: evaluation of 103 cases. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:824-8. (Pubitemid 39061099)
10. Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L, Chan SF, Macaskill P, Mannes P, et al. Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367:122-32.
11. Hayama FH, Motta AC, Silva Ade P, Migliari DA. Liquid-based preparations versus conventional cytology: specimen adequacy and diagnostic agreement in oral lesions. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10:115-22.
12. Navone R, Burlo P, Pich A, Pentenero M, Broccoletti R, Marsico A, et al. The impact of liquid-based oral cytology on the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma. Cytopathology. 2007;18:356-60. (Pubitemid 350145650)
13. Bhoopathi V, Kabani S, Mascarenhas AK. Low positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy in detecting dysplastic oral lesions. Cancer. 2009;115:1036-40.
14. Potter TJ, Summerlin DJ, Campbell JH. Oral malignancies associated with negative transepithelial brush biopsy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:674-7.
15. Warnakulasuriya S, Reibel J, Bouquot J, Dabelsteen E. Oral epithelial dysplasia classification systems: predictive value, utility, weaknesses and scope for improvement. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008;37:127-33. (Pubitemid 351178405)
16. Christian DC. Computer-assisted analysis of oral brush biopsies at an oral cancer screening program. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133:357-62.
17. Navone R, Marsico A, Reale I, Pich A, Broccoletti R, Pentenero M, et al. Usefulness of oral exfoliative cytology for the diagnosis of oral squamous dysplasia and carcinoma. Minerva Stomatol. 2004;53:77-86.
18. Poate TW, Buchanan JA, Hodgson TA, Speight PM, Barrett AW, Moles DR, et al. An audit of the efficacy of the oral brush biopsy technique in a specialist Oral Medicine unit. Oral Oncol. 2004;40:829-34.
19. Sciubba JJ. Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. U.S. Collaborative OralCDx Study Group. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999;130:1445-57.
20. Fist S. The oral brush biopsy: separating fact from fiction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003;96:654-5.