Gift giving to biobanks

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 33-34

  Glantz, Leonard H ^a   Roche, Patricia ^a   Annas, George J ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; CONFIDENTIALITY; CRIME; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ETHICS; GIFT GIVING; GROUP STRUCTURE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PERSONNEL; PRIVACY; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STANDARDS; STEREOTYPING; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

COMPREHENSION; CONFIDENTIALITY; CRIME; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GIFT GIVING; GROUP STRUCTURE; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIVACY; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SPECIMEN HANDLING; STEREOTYPING; TISSUE BANKS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956399705     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.507653     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Glantz, L. H., P. Roche, and G. J. Annas. 2008. Rules for donations to tissue banks-What next? New England Journal of Medicine 358(3): 298-303 (January 17, 2008).
2. Moore v. Regents of the University of California. 1990. 793 P.2d 479, 271 Cal. Rptr. 146.
3. Office for Human Research Protections. 1997. Issues to consider in the research use of stored data or tissues. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/reposit.htm (accessed May 4, 2010).
4. Rothstein, M. A. 2010. Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research? American Journal of Bioethics 10(9): 3-11.