Electronic health records and research: Privacy versus scientific priorities

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 19-20

  Hoffman, Sharona ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ETHICS; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIVACY; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

CONFIDENTIALITY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIVACY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 77956397438     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.492894     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Evans, B. J. 2010. Authority of the Food and Drug Administration to require data access and control use rights in the Sentinel Data Network. Food & Drug Law Journal 65: 67-112.
2. Hall, M. A. 2010. Property, privacy, and the pursuit of interconnected electronic medical records. Iowa Law Review 95: 631-663.
3. Hoffman, S. 2005. 'Racially-tailored' medicine unraveled. American University Law Review 55: 395-456.
4. Hoffman, S., and A. Podgurski. 2008. Finding a cure: The case for regulation and oversight of electronic health record systems. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 22: 103-165.
5. Hoffman, S., and A. Podgurski. 2009. E-Health hazards: Provider liability and electronic health record systems. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 24: 1523-1581.
6. Institute of Medicine. 2009. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
7. Merrill, M. 2009. Kaiser-Permanente to boost health research with $54 million grant. Healthcare IT News. Available at: http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/kaiser-permanente-boost-healthresearch-54m-grant (accessed April 23, 2010).
8. PricewaterhouseCoopers. 2009. Transforming healthcare through secondary use of health data. Available at: http://www.pwc.com/us/en/healthcare/publications/secondary-health-data.jhtml (accessed April 23, 2010).
9. Rothstein, M. A. 2010. Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research? American Journal of Bioethics 10(9): 3-11.
10. Stewart, W. F., R. N. Shah, M. J. Selena et al. 2007. Bridging the inferential gap: The electronic health record and clinical evidence. Health Affairs 26(2): w181-191.