Association between utility and treatment among patients with prostate cancer

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 711-720

  Jayadevappa, Ravishankar ^a   Schwartz, J Sanford ^a   Chhatre, Sumedha ^a   Wein, Alan J ^a   Malkowicz, S Bruce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

External beam radiation therapy; Health related quality of life; Prostate cancer; Quality of wellbeing; Radical prostatectomy; Utility

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77956392255     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9622-8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., et al. (2009). Cancer statistics, 2009. CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 59(4), 1-25.
2. Litwin, M. S., & Saigal, C. S. (ed). (2007). Urologic diseases in American. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute ofDiabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Washington, DC:US Government Printing Office, 2007; NIH Publication No. 07-5512.
3. Borre, M., Nerstrom, B., & Overgaard, J. (1997). The dilemma of prostate cancer-A growing human and economic burden irrespective of treatment strategies. Acta Oncologica, 36(7), 681-687.
4. McNaughton-Collins, M., Walker-Corkery, E., & Barry, M. J. (2004). Health-related quality of life, satisfaction and economic outcome measures in studies of prostate cancer screening and treatment, 1990-2000. Journal of National Cancer Institute, Monographs, 33, 78-101.
5. Chan, J. M., Jou, R. M., & Carroll, P. R. (2004). The relative impact and future burden of prostate cancer in the United States. The Journal of Urology, 172, S13-S17.
6. Quek, M. L., & Penson, D. F. (2005). Quality of life in patients with localized prostate cancer. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 23, 208-215.
7. Jayadevappa, R., Chhatre, S., Bloom, B. S., et al. (2006). Health related quality of life and satisfaction with care among older men treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. British Journal of urology International, 97, 955-962.
8. Sanda, M. G., Dunn, R. L., Michalski, J., et al. (2008). Quality of life and satisfaction with care outcome among prostate cancer survivors. New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 1250-1261.
9. Patrick, D. L., & Chiang, Y. P. (2000). Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations. Medical Care 38 (suppl II): II-14-II-25.
10. Fleming, G., Wasson, J. H., Albertsen, P. C., et al. (1993). A decision analysis of alternative treatment strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer. Journal of American Medical Association, 269(20), 2650-2658.
11. King, J. T., Tsevat, J., Lave, J. R., et al. (2005). Willingness to pay for a quality adjusted life year: Implications for societal health care resource allocation. Medical Decision Making, 25, 667-677.
12. Ware, J. E., Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473-483.
13. Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., Ware, J. E., Jr, et al. (1988). The MOS short form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care, 26, 724-735.
14. Litwin, M. S., Hays, R. D., Fink, A., et al. (1998). The UCLA prostate cancer index: Development, reliability and validity of health-related quality of life measure. Medical Care, 36, 1002-1012.
15. Andersen, E. M. (1998). Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the quality of well-being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Medical Care, 36(9), 1349-1360.
16. Kaplan, R. M., & Anderson, J. P. (1998). A general health policy model: Update and applications. Health Services Research, 23(2), 203-235.
17. Kaplan, R. M., Ganiats, T. G., Sieber, W. J., & Anderson, J. P. (1998). The quality of well-being scale: Critical similarities and differences with SF-36. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 10(6), 509-520.
18. Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., et al. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40, 373-383.
19. Allison, P. D. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
20. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
21. D'Agostino, R. B., Jr. (1998). Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2265-2281.
22. Oakes, M. (1990). Statistical inference. Chestnut Hill, MA: Epidemiological Resources.
23. Engels, J. M., & Diehr, P. (2003). Imputation of missing longitudinal data: A comparison of methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 968-976.
24. Lazzaro, C., Bartoletti, R., Guazzoni, G., et al. (2007). QuABIOS Study Group. Economic evaluation of different hormonal therapies for prostate cancer. Final results from the Quality of Life Antiandrogen Blockade Italian Observational Study (QuABIOS). Archivio Italiano di Urologia, Andrologia, 79(3), 104-107.
25. Sommers, B. D., Beard, C. J., D'Amico, A. V., et al. (2008). Predictors of patient preferences and treatment choice for localized prostate cancer. Cancer, 113, 2058-2067.
26. Bhatnagar, V., Stewart, S. T., Bonney, W. W., et al. (2004). Treatment options for localized prostate cancer: Quality-adjusted life years and the effects of lead time. Urology, 63, 103-109.
27. Stewart, S. T., Lenert, L., Bhatnagar, V., et al. (2005). Utilities for prostate cancer health states in men aged 60 and older. Medical Care, 43, 347-355.
28. Chen, R. C., Clark, J. A., & Talcott, J. A. (2009). ) Individualizing quality-of-life outcomes reporting how localized prostate cancer treatments after patients with different levels of baseline urinary, bowel and sexual function. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(24), 3916-3922.
29. Fumitaka, S., Katsuki, F., Yoichi, M. I., et al. (2008). Factors associated with variation in utility scores among patients with prostate cancer. Value in Health, 7(11), 1190-1193.
30. Krahn, M., Ritvo, P., Irvine, J., et al. (2003). Patient and community preferences for outcomes in prostate cancer. Medical Care, 41, 153-164.
31. Saigal, C. S., Gornbein, J., Reid, K., et al. (2002). Stability of time trade-off utilities for health states associated with the treatment of prostate cancer. Quality of Life Research, 11, 405-414.
32. Bremner, K. E., Chong, A. K. Y. C., Tomlinson, G., et al. (2007). A review and meta analysis of prostate cancer utilities. Medical Decision Making, 27, 288-298.
33. Saigal, C. S., Cornbein, J., Nease, R., et al. (2001). Predictors of utilities for health states in early stage prostate cancer. Journal of Urology, 166, 942-946.
34. Karin, S., Per, C., Gabriel, S., et al. (2004). The estimated economic value of the welfare loss due to prostate cancer pain in a defined population. Acta Oncologica, 43(3), 290-296.
35. Elkin, E. B., Cowen, M. E., Cahill, D., et al. (2004). Preference assessment method affects decision-analytic recommendations: A prostate cancer treatment example. Medical Decision Making, 24, 504-510.