Testing implicit assumptions and explicit recommendations: The effects of probability information on risk perception

Journal of Health Communication

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 578-589

  Mevissen, Fraukje E F ^a   Meertens, Ree M ^a   Ruiter, Robert A C ^a   Schaalma, Herman P ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHLAMYDIASIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHLAMYDIA INFECTIONS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; MALE; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956382504     PISSN: 10810730     EISSN: 10870415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499591     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & McCaul, K. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136-145.
2. Bruine de Bruin, W., Downs, J. S., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Adolescents' thinking about the risks of sexual behaviors. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 421-439). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Can adolescents predict significant life events? Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 208-210.
4. Canin, L., Dolcini, M. M., & Adler, N. E. (1999). Barriers to and facilitators of HIV-STD behavior change: Intrapersonal and relationship-based factors. Review of General Psychology, 3, 338-371.
5. Crosby, R. A., Newman, D., Kamb, M. L., Zenilman, J., Douglas, J. M., & Iatesta, M. (2000). Misconceptions about STD-protective behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19, 167-173.
6. Darroch, J., Myers, L., & Cassell, J. (2003). Sex differences in the experience of testing positive screening programme with implications for public health and for a national for genital Chlamydia infection: A qualitative study. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 79, 372-373.
7. De Hoog, N., Stroebe, W., & De Wit, J. B. F. (2005). The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 24-33.
8. De Wit, J. B. F., Das, E., & Vet, R. (2008). What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology, 27, 110-115.
9. Doyle, J. K. (1997). Judging cumulative risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 500-524.
10. Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407-429.
11. Fuller, R., Dudley, N., & Blacktop, J. (2004). Older people's understanding of cumulative risks when provided with annual stroke risk information. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 80, 677-678.
12. Glanz, K., & Yang, H. (1996). Communicating about risk of infectious diseases. Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 253-256.
13. Good, A., & Abraham, C. (2007). Measuring defensive responses to threatening messages: A meta-analysis of measures. Health Psychology Review, 1, 208-229.
14. Holtgrave, D. R., Tinsley, B. J., & Kay, L. S. (1995). Encouraging risk reduction. A decision-making approach to message design. In E. Maibach & R. L. Parrott (Eds.), Designing health messages. Approaches from communication theory and public health pratices (pp. 24-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26, 631-639.
16. Klein, H., Elifson, K. W., & Sterk, C. E. (2003). "At risk" women who think that they have no chance of getting HIV: Self-assessed perceived risks. Women & Health, 38, 47-63.
17. Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., et al. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 221-235.
18. Mevissen, F. E. F., Meertens, R. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Feenstra, H., & Schaalma, H. (2009). HIV=STI risk communication: The effects of scenario-based risk information and frequency-based risk information on perceived susceptibility to Chlamydia and HIV. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 78-87.
19. Milne, S., Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: A meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 106-143.
20. Misovich, S. J., Fisher, J. D., & Fisher, W. A. (1997). Close relationships and elevated HIV risk behavior: Evidence and possible underlying psychological processes. Review of General Psychology, 1, 72-107.
21. Nakao, M. A., & Axelrod, S. (1983). Numbers are better than words. Verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicine. The American Journal of Medicine, 74, 1061-1065.
22. Pinkerton, S. D., Wagner-Raphael, L. I., Craun, C. A., & Abramson, P. R. (2000). A quantitative study of the accuracy of college students' HIV risk estimates. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 5, 1-25.
23. Renner, B. (2004). Biased reasoning: Adaptive responses to health risk feedback. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 384-396.
24. Rothman, A. J., & Kiviniemi, M. T. (1999). Treating people with information: An analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 44-51.
25. Ruiter, R. A. C., Abraham, C., & Kok, G. (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health, 16, 613-630.
26. Shaklee, H., & Fischhoff, B. (1990). The psychology of contraceptive surprises: Cumulative risk and contraceptive effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 385-403.
27. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Accident probabilities and seat belt usage: A psychological perspective. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 10, 281-285.
28. Türmen, T. (2003). Gender and HIV/AIDS. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 82, 411-418.
29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
30. Van der Pligt, J. (1998). Perceived risk and vulnerability as predictors of precautionary behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 1-14.
31. Visschers, V., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W., & DeVries, N. K. (2009). Probability information in risk communication: A review of the research literature. Risk Analysis, 29, 267-287.
32. Weber, E. U., & Hilton, D. J. (1990). Contextual effects in the interpretations of probability words: Perceived base rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 781-789.
33. Weinstein, N. D. (1984). Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology, 3, 431-457.
34. Weinstein, N. D. (1999). What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 15-20.
35. Wogalter, M. S., Young, S. L., Brelsford, J. W., & Barlow, T. (1999). The relative contributions of injury severity and likelihood information on hazard-risk judgments and warning compliance. Journal of Safety Research, 30, 151-162.