Domestic and international surrogacy laws: Implications for cancer survivors

Cancer Treatment and Research

Volumn 156, Issue , 2010, Pages 135-152

  Sreenivas, Kiran ^a   Campo Engelstein, Lisa ^b  

^a Teresa K Woodruff Lab   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TAMOXIFEN;

ADOPTION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURVIVOR; CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FEMALE STERILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL ASPECT; OVARIAN PRESERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; UTERUS CANCER;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES; NEOPLASMS; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS; SURROGATE MOTHERS; SURVIVORS;

EID: 77956371980     PISSN: 09273042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_10     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Curado M, Edwards B, Shin H, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents (1998-2002). Vol. IX, No. 160. Lyon: IARC Scientific Publications; 2007.
2. Uterine Cancer: Who's at Risk? What You Need To Know About: Cancer of the Uterus [2002; http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/wyntk/uterus/page4]. Accessed August 24, 2009.
3. Treatment. What You Need To Know About: Cancer of the Cervix [2008; http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/wyntk/cervix/page8]. Accessed August 24, 2009.
4. Milliken DA, Shepherd JH. Fertility preserving surgery for carcinoma of the cervix. Curr Opin Oncol. 2008;20(5):575-80.
5. Wo JY, Viswanathan AN. Impact of radiotherapy on fertility, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes in female cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(5):1304-12.
6. Tamoxifen: Questions and Answers. National Cancer Institute: Fact Sheet [2008; http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Therapy/tamoxifen]. Accessed August 25, 2009.
7. Brinsden P. Clinical aspects of IVF surrogacy in Britain. In: Cook R, Sclater S, Kaganas F, Eds. Surrogate motherhood international perspectives. Portland: Hart Publishing; 2003:99-112.
8. Goldfarb JM, Austin C, Peskin B, Lisbona H, Desai N, de Mola JR. Fifteen years experience with an in-vitro fertilization surrogate gestational pregnancy programme. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(5):1075-8.
9. Stafford-Bell MA, Copeland CM. Surrogacy in Australia: implantation rates have implications for embryo quality and uterine receptivity. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2001;13(1):99-104.
10. Surrogate motherhood. In: Lehman J, Phelps S, Eds. West's encyclopedia of American law. Vol. 9, 2nd edn. Detroit: Gale; 2005:408-16.
11. Markens S. Surrogate motherhood and the politics of reproduction. Los Angeles: University of California Press; 2007.
12. Baby M, In Re. In: Lehman J, Phelps S, Eds. West's encyclopedia of American law. Vol. 9, 2nd edn. Detroit: Gale; 2005:431-3.
13. Andrews L. Between strangers: surrogate mothers, expectant fathers & brave new babies. New York: Harper & Row; 1989.
14. Bennett KA. Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 2005;48(1):38-47.
15. Kindregan C, McBrien M. Assisted reproductive technology: a lawyer's guide to emerging law & science. Chicago: American Bar Association; 2006.
16. Chang M. Womb for rent: India's commercial surrogacy. Harvard Int Rev. 2009 Spring: 3111-2.
17. Gentleman A. India nurtures business of surrogate motherhood. New York Times. 2008.
18. Schuz R. Surrogacy in Israel: an analysis of the law in practice. In: Cook R, Sclater S, Kaganas F, Eds. Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Portland: Oxford; 2003:35-54.
19. Hunter-Henin M. Surrogacy: is there room for a new liberty between the French prohibitive position and the english ambivalence. In: Freeman M, Ed. Law and bioethics. New York: Oxford; 2008:329-57.
20. Surrogacy Orphan Trapped in Red Tape After Mothers Abandon Her. The Times; 2008. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article4474231. ece.
21. Children born through Surrogacy Arrangements applying for Australian Citizenship by Descent. Australian High Commission: India. [http://www.india. embassy.gov. au/ndli/vm-surrogacy.html]. Accessed September 17, 2009.
22. Rao R. Surrogacy law in the United States: the outcome of ambivalence. In: Cook R, Sclater SD, Kaganas F, Eds. Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2003.
23. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. IFFS Surveillance 07. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(4 Supp 1) S50-S51.
24. Daniels K. The policy and practice of surrogacy in New Zealand. In: Cook R, Sclater S, Kaganas F, Eds. Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Oxford: Portland; 2003:55-74.
25. Werb J. Gay man seeks perfect woman: surrogate mothers find a new market niche: single gay men. Macleans. May 21, 2007.
26. Bateman C. New Law will say no payment to surrogate mothers. CME: Your SA Journal of CPD. 2007;25:343.
27. Keppler V, Bokelmann M. Surrogate Motherhood - The Legla Situation in Germany. The American Surrogacy Center; 2000. http://www.surrogacy.com/legals/ article/germany.html