Social semantic cloud of tags: Semantic model for folksonomies

Knowledge Management Research and Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 193-202

  Kim, Hak Lae ^a,e   Breslin, John ^b   Kim, Hong Gee ^c   Choi, Jae Hwa ^d  

^a SAMSUNG Electronics   (South Korea)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^d Dankook University   (South Korea)

^e Service Platform Group   (South Korea)

Author keywords

conceptual modeling; explicit knowledge; folksonomy; ontology; semantic web; tagging

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956370699     PISSN: 14778238     EISSN: 14778246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/kmrp.2010.10     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. BERNERS-LEE T (1998) Semantic web road map. World Wide Web Design Issues [WWW document] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html (accessed 20 January 2010).
2. BERNERS-LEE T (2006) Linked data. World Wide Web Design Issues [WWW document] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html (accessed 20 January 2010).
3. BERNERS-LEE T, HENDLER J and LASSILA O (2001) The semantic web. Scientific American 284(5), 34-43 [WWW document] http://www.sciam.com/article. cfm?id=the-semantic-web (accessed 20 January 2010).
4. CATTUTO C, SCHMITZ C, BALDASSARRI A, SERVEDIO VDP, LORETO V, HOTHO A, GRAHL M and STUMME G (2007) Network properties of folksonomies. AI Communications Journal, Special Issue on 'Network Analysis in Natural Sciences and Engineering' 20(4), 245-262.
5. GRUBER T (2005) Tag Ontology - a way to agree on the semantics of tagging data [WWW document] http://tomgruber.org/writing/tagontology-tagcamp-talk.pdf (accessed 20 January 2010).
6. GRUBER T (2007) Ontology of folksonomy: a mash-up of apples and oranges. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 3(2), 1-11.
7. GRUBER T (2008) Collective knowledge systems: where the social web meets the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics 6(1), 4-13.
8. HALPIN H, ROBU V and SHEPHERD H (2007) The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp 211-220, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 08-12 May 2007. WWW'07. ACM, New York, http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1242572.1242602.
9. HENDLER J (2007) Shirkyng my responsibility. [WWW document] http://www.mindswap.org/blog/2007/11/21/shirkyng-my-responsibility/ (accessed 20 January 2010).
10. HENDLER J, SHADBOLT N, HALL W, BERNERS-LEE T and WEITZNER D (2008) Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web. Communications of the ACM 51(7), 60-69.
11. KIM HL, BRESLIN JG, YANG SK and KIM HG (2008a) interest: building a tag sharing service with the SCOT ontology. In Proceedings of AAAI 2008 Spring Symposium on Social Information Processing (Lerman K, Gutelius D, Huberman B and Merugu S, Eds), Technical Report SS-08-06. 2008.
12. KIM HL, PASSANT A, BRESLIN JG, SCERRI S and DECKER S (2008b) Review and alignment of tag ontologies for semantically-linked data in collaborative tagging spaces. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing pp, 315-322, IEEE, USA, http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1446386.
13. KIM HL, SCERRI S, BRESLIN JG, DECKER S and KIM HG (2008c) The state of the art in tag ontologies: a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, pp. 128-137, Berlin, Germany, 22-28 September 2008. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1503418.1503431.
14. KIM HL, BRESLIN JG, SCERRI S, DECKER S, KIM HG and YANG SK (2008d) SCOT ontology specification [WWW document] http://scot-project.org/scot/index.html (accessed 20 January 2010).
15. KROSKI E (2005) The hive mind: folksonomies and user-based tagging [WWW document] http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2005/12/07/the-hive-mind-folksonomies- and-user-based-tagging/ (accessed 20 January 2010).
16. MARLOW C, NAAMAN M, BOYD D and DAVIS M (2006) HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp 31-40, Odense, Denmark, 22-25 August 2006. HYPERTEXT '06, ACM, New York, http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=1149941.11449949.
17. MATHES A (2004) Folksonomies - cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata [WWW document] http://www.adammathes.com/ academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html (accessed 20 January 2010).
18. MERHOLZ P (2004) Metadata for the masses [WWW document] http://adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000361.php (accessed 20 January 2010).
19. MIKA P (2007) Ontologies are us: a unified model of social networks and semantics. Journal of Web Semantics 5(1), 5-15.
20. NADLER L (2006) Gartner highlights seven core benefits of Web 2.0 for traditional industries, http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=499154 (accessed 20 January 2010).
21. NEWMAN R, AYERS D and RUSSELL S (2005) Tag ontology [WWW document] http://www.holygoat.co.uk/owl/redwood/0.1/tags/ (accessed 20 January 2010).
22. PASSANT A and LAUBLET P (2008) Meaning of a tag: a collaborative approach to bridge the gap between tagging and linked data. In Proceedings of the Linked Data on the Web Workshop (LDOW2008) (Bizer C, Heath T, Idehen K and Bemers-Lee T, Eds), 22 April, Beijing, China, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, ISSN 1613-0073, online CEUR-WS.org/Vol-369/.
23. QUINTARELLI E (2005) Folksonomies: power to the people [WWW document] http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm (accessed 20 January 2010).
24. RAINIE L (2007) 28% of online Americans have used the internet to tag content [WWW document] http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP-Tagging.pdf (accessed 20 January 2010).
25. SHIRKY C (2005) Ontology is overrated: categories, links and tags [WWW document] http://shirky.com/writings/ontology-overrated.html (accessed 20 January 2010).
26. SPIVACK N (2005) Folktologies-beyond the Folksonomy vs. ontology distinction [WWW document] http://novaspivack.typepad.com/nova-spivacks-weblog/ 2005/01/whats-after-fol.html (accessed 20 January 2010).
27. TAGCOMMONS (2007a) Functional requirements for sharing tag data [WWW document] http://tagcommons.org/2007/02/28/functional-requirements-for-sharing- tag-data/ (accessed 20 January 2010).
28. TAGCOMMONS (2007b) Ontologies Vs. formats Vs. schema Vs. APIs [WWW document] http://tagcommons.org/2007/03/02/ontologiesvs-formats-vs-schema-vs- apis/ (accessed 20 January 2010).
29. VANDER WAL (2005) Folksonomy definition and wikipedia [WWW document] http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1750 (accessed 20 January 2010).
30. WEINBERGER D (2005) Taxonomies and tags: from trees to piles of leaves. Esther Dysons Monthly Report 23(2), 1-36.