Morally justifying oncofertility research

Cancer Treatment and Research

Volumn 156, Issue , 2010, Pages 187-194

  McLeod, Carolyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURVIVOR; CHILD PARENT RELATION; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LIFE SATISFACTION; MORALITY; PARENTHOOD; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; MORALS; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77956356682     PISSN: 09273042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_14     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Nisker J, Baylis F, McLeod C. Preserving the reproductive capacity of girls and young adolescent women with cancer: informed choice. Cancer. 2006;107(7 Suppl): 1686-9.
2. Rosoff PM, Katsur ML. Preserving fertility in young cancer patients: a medical, ethical and legal challenge. J Philos Sci Law. 2003;3. http://www6.miami.edu/ethics/jpsl/archives/papers/preservingFert.html. Accessed December 18, 2009.
3. Backhus LE, Zoloth L. Today's research, tomorrow's cures: the ethical implications of oncofertility. In: Woodruff TK, Snyder KA, Eds. Oncofertility: fertility preservation for cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2007:163-79.
4. Robertson JA. Children of choice: freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1994
5. Pearson YE. Storks, cabbage patches, and the right to procreate. Bioeth Inq 2007;4:105-15.
6. Bartholet E. Family bonds: adoption, infertility, and the new world of child production. Boston: Beacon Press; 1993.
7. Greil AL. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45(11):1679-704.
8. Harwood K. The infertility treadmill: feminist ethics, personal choice, and the use of reproductive technologies. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2007.
9. Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, et al. Having children after cancer: a pilot study of survivors' attitudes and experience. Cancer. 1999;86(4):697-709.
10. Powdthavee N. Think having children will make you happy? Psychologist. 2009;22(4):308-10.
11. Kinahan KE, Didwania A, Nieman CL. Childhood cancer: fertility and psychosocial implications. In: Woodruff TA, Snyder KA, Eds. Oncofertility: fertility preservation for cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2007:191-200.
12. Gardino S, Russell A, Woodruff TK. Adoption after cancer: adoption agency attitudes and perspectives on the potential to parent post-cancer. In: Woodruff TK, Zoloth L, Campo-Engelstein L, Rodriguez S, Eds. Oncofertility: reflections from the humanities and social sciences. New York: Springer; 2010.
13. Haslanger S. Forthcoming. Family, ancestry and self: what is the moral significance of biological ties?" Forthcoming In: Adoption and culture. http://www.mit.edu/-shaslang/papers/HaslangerFASpdf. Accessed December 18, 2009.
14. Peddie VL, van Teijlingen E, Bhattacharya S. A qualitative study of women's decision-making at the end of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(7):1944-51.
15. Bryson CA, Sykes DH, Traub AI. In-vitro fertilization: a long-term follow-up after treatment failure. Hum Fertil 2000;3:214-20.
16. Petropanagos A. Reproductive "choice" and egg freezing. In: Woodruff TK, Zoloth L, Campo-Engelstein L, Rodriguez S, Eds. Oncofertility: reflections from the humanities and social sciences. New York: Springer; 2010.
17. Roberts D. Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage; 1997.
18. Schover LR. Psychosocial aspects of infertility and decisions about reproduction in young cancer survivors: a review. Med Pediatr Oncol 1999;33:53-9.
19. Snyder KA. Oncofertility and the social sciences. In: Woodruff TK, Snyder KA, Eds. Oncofertility: fertility preservation for cancer survivors. New York: Springer; 2007:137-48.