The capabilities conception of the individual

Review of Social Economy

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 413-429

  Davis, John B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Capabilities; Individual conception; Self organization; Social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956347291     PISSN: 00346764     EISSN: 14701162     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00346760903254250     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, M. and Collins, P. (eds) (2004) “Introduction,” in Race, Class, and Gender, 5th ed., Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson.
2. Ashby, W. R. (1947) “Principles of the Self-Organizing Dynamic System,” Journal of General Psychology 37: 125-128.
3. Banaji, M. and Prentice, D. (1994) “The Self in Social Contexts,” Annual Review of Psychology 45: 297-332.
4. Binmore, K. (2005) Natural Justice, New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Brewer, M. (2001) “The Many Faces of Social Identity: Implications for Political Psychology,” Political Psychology 22: 115-125.
6. Brown, R. (2000) “Social Identity Theory: Past Achievements, Current Problems and Future Challenges,” European Journal of Social Psychology 30: 745-778.
7. Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1992) “Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange,” in J. Barkow (ed.) The Adapted Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163-228.
8. Davis, J. (2006) “The Normative Significance of the Individual in Economics,” in J. Clary, W. Dolfsma and D. Figart (eds) Ethics and the Market: Insights from Social Economics, London: Routledge, pp. 69-83.
9. Epstein, S. (1973) “The Self-concept Revisited or a Theory of a Theory,” American Psychologist 28: 405-416.
10. Goldman, A. (2006) The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Hayek, F. (1945) “The Uses of Knowledge in Society,” American Economic Review 35: 519-530.
12. Luhmann, N. (1984) Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp; trans. as Social Systems, Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.
13. Margalit, A. (1996) The Decent Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
14. Markus, H. and Wurf, E. (1987) “The Dynamic Self-concept: A Social Psychological Perspective,” in M. Rosenzweig and L. Porter (eds) Annual Review of Psychology 38, pp. 299-337.
15. Maslow, A. (1970) Motivation and Personality, 2nd edn, New York: Harper.
16. Mirowski, P. (2002) Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Oyserman, D. (2001) Self-concept and Identity, in A. Tesser and N. Schwarz (eds) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology, Malden, MA: Blackwell Press, pp. 499-517.
18. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
19. Robeyns, I. (2005) “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey,” Journal of Human Development 6(1): 93-117.
20. Sen, A. (1990) “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts,” in I. Tinker (ed.) Persistent Inequalities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Reexamined, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Sen, A. (1993) “Capability and Well-Being,” in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds) The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30-53.
23. Shields, S. (2008) “Gender: An Interdisciplinary Perspective,” Sex Roles 59: 301-311.
24. Vizard, P. (2005) “The Contributions of Professor Amartya Sen in the Field of Human Rights,” Center for Analysis of Social Exclusion paper, London School of Economics.
25. Wiener, N. (1961) Cybernetic Systems, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.