Zonal centrality measures and the neighborhood effect

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 733-743

  Sohn, Keemin ^a   Kim, Daehyun ^b  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b Doosan Engineering and Construction   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Betweenness; Centrality; Closeness; Kernel function; Neighborhood effect; Straightness

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; SOCIOLOGY; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

BETWEENNESS; CENTRALITY; CLOSENESS; KERNEL FUNCTION; NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECT; STRAIGHTNESS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

CENTRAL PLACE THEORY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; NEIGHBORHOOD; OPTIMIZATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; URBAN TRANSPORT; ZONING SYSTEM;

SEOUL [SEOUL (ADS)]; SEOUL [SOUTH KOREA]; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 77956343374     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anthonisse, J.M., 1971. The Rush in a Directed Graph. Technical Report BN 9/71, Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Armsterdam Aptech Systems Inc., 2006. Gauss User Guide.
2. Ben-Akiva M., Walker J., Bernardino A.T., Gopinath D., Morikawa T., Polydoropoulou A. Integration of choice and latent variable models. Perpetual Motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunities and Application Challenges 2002, 431-470. Elsevier. H.S. Mahmassani (Ed.).
3. Bonacich P., Lioyd P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations. Social Networks 2001, 23:191-201.
4. Brandes U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2001, 25(2):163-177.
5. Cao R., Cuevas A., Gonzales-Manteiga W. A comparative study of several smoothing methods in density estimation. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1994, 17:153-176.
6. Crucitti P., Latora V., Porta S. Centrality measures in spatial networks of urban street. Physical Review E 2006, 73:036125.
7. Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1979, 1:215-239.
8. Gamas, J.A., Anderson W.P., Pastor C., 2006. Estimation of Trip Generation in Mexico City, Mexico, with Spatial Effects and Urban Densities. Transportation Research Record, No. 1985, pp. 49-60.
9. Gonçalves J.A.M., Portugal L.S., Nassi C.D. Centrality indicators as an instrument to evaluate the integration of urban equipment in the area of influence of a rail corridor. Transportation Research Part A 2009, 43:13-25.
10. Hansen W. How accessibility shape land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 1959, 25(2):73-76.
11. Kim, J.H., Chung J.H., Kim I.K., Lim U., 2009. Spatial Dependence in Trip Generation Models: A Spatial Econometric Perspective. In: The Proceedings of 2009 Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.
12. Koenig J.G. Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation 1980, 9:145-172.
13. Latora V., Marchiori M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical Review Letter 2001, 87:198701.
14. Latora V., Marchiori M. Vulnerability and protection of infrastructure networks. Physical Review E 2005, 71:005203.
15. Leake G.R., Huzayyin A.S. Accessibility measures and their suitability for use in trip generation models. Traffic Engineering and Control 1979, 20(12):566-572.
16. Lehmann E.L., Casella G. Theory of Point Estimation 1998, Springer. second ed.
17. Li Q., Racine J.S. Nonparametric Econometrics Theory and Practice 2007, Princeton University Press.
18. Liu Y.H., Mahmassani H.S. Global maximum likelihood estimation procedure for multinomial probit (MNP) model parameters. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 2000, 34(5):419-449.
19. Mackiewicz A., Ratajczak W. Towards a new definition of topological accessibility. Transportation Research Part B 1996, 30:47-79.
20. Nakkash T.Z., Grecco W.L. Activity-accessibility models of trip generation. Highway Research Record 1972, 392:98-110.
21. Ortúza J.D., Willumsen L.G. Modeling Transport 2001, John Wiley & Sons. third ed.
22. Ruhnau B. Eigenvector-centrality - a node-centrality?. Social Networks 2000, 22:357-365.
23. Seoul Metropolitan Government, 2008. Transportation Survey.
24. Strano, E., Cardillo, A., Lacoviello, V., Latora, V., Messora, R., Porta, S., Scellato, S., 2007. Street Centrality vs. Commerce and Service Locations in Cities: a Kernel Density Correlation Case in Bologna, Italy. Physics and Society. arXiv:physics/0701111v1.
25. Vickerman R.W. Accessibility, attraction, and potential: a review of some concepts and thir use in determining mobility. Environment and Planning A 1974, 6:675-691.
26. Wand M.P., Jones M.C. Kernel Smoothing, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 1995, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
27. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Networks Analysis 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.