Robust optimization of dense gas flows under uncertain operating conditions

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1893-1908

  Cinnella, P ^a   Hercus, S J ^a  

^a DYNFLUID LABORATORY   (France)

Author keywords

Dense gas dynamics; Polynomial chaos; Robust optimization; Uncertainty quantification

Indexed keywords

AIRFOIL PROFILE; DENSE GAS; DENSE GAS DYNAMICS; DENSE GAS FLOWS; HIGHLY SENSITIVE; INDUSTRIAL PROCESSS; INPUT PARAMETER; INVISCID FLOWS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; NON-INTRUSIVE; OPERATING CONDITION; ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLES; PARETO FRONT; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; PROBABILISTIC COLLOCATION METHOD; RANDOM VARIATION; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEM RESPONSE; THERMODYNAMIC CONDITIONS; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS;

AIRFOILS; CHAOS THEORY; ENERGY CONVERSION; GAS DYNAMICS; GASES; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; POLYNOMIALS; RANKINE CYCLE; WASTE HEAT;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 77956341256     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.06.020     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Horen J., Talonpoika T., Larjola J., Siikonen T. Numerical simulation of real-gas flow in a supersonic turbine nozzle ring. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2002, 124(2):395-403.
2. Brown B., Argrow B. Application of Bethe-Zel'dovich-Thompson fluids in organic Rankine cycle engines. J Propul Power 2000, 16(6):1118-1123.
3. Monaco J., Cramer M., Watson L. Supersonic flows of dense gases in cascade configurations. J Fluid Mech 1997, 330:31-59.
4. Angelino G., Invernizzi C. Supercritical heat pump cycles. Int J Refrig 1994, 17(8):543-554.
5. Zamfirescu C., Dincer I. Performance investigation of high-temperature heat pumps with various BZT working fluids. Thermochim Acta 2009, 488:66-77.
6. Kirillov N. Analysis of modern natural gas liquefaction technologies. Chem Petrol Eng 2004, 40(7-8):401-406.
7. Lambrakis K., Thompson P. Existence of real fluids with a negative fundamental derivative Γ. Phys Fluids 1972, 15(5):933-935.
8. Thompson P., Lambrakis K. Negative shock waves. J Fluid Mech 1973, 60:187-208.
9. Cramer M. Negative nonlinearity in selected fluorocarbons. Phys Fluids 1989, 1(11):1894-1897.
10. Colonna P., Nannan N., Guardone A., van der Stelt T. On the computation of the fundamental derivative of gas dynamics using equations of state. Fluid Phase Equilibr 2009, 286(1):43-54.
11. Thompson P. A fundamental derivative in gas dynamics. Phys Fluids 1971, 14:1843-1849.
12. Cramer M., Kluwick A. On the propagation of waves exhibiting both positive and negative nonlinearity. J Fluid Mech 1984, 142:9-37.
13. Cramer M., Tarkenton G. Transonic flows of Bethe-Zel'dovich-Thompson Fluids. J Fluid Mech 1992, 240:197-228.
14. Maizza V., Maizza A. Unconventional working fluids in organic rankine-cycles for waste energy recovery systems. Appl Therm Eng 2001, 21:381-390.
15. Hung T., Shai T., Wang S. A review of organic rankine cycles (ORCs) for the recovery of low-grade waste heat. Energy 1997, 22(7):661-667.
16. Cinnella P., Congedo P. Aerodynamic performance of transonic Bethe-Zel'dovich-Thompson flows past an airfoil. AIAA J 2005, 43:370-378.
17. AIAA. Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. G-077-1998, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics; 1998. ISBN 1563472856.
18. Cinnella P., Congedo P., Pediroda L. Quantification of thermodynamic uncertainties in real-gas flows. Int J Eng Syst Modell Simul 2009, 2(1-2):12-24.
19. Loeven A, Witteveen J, Bijl H. Efficient uncertainty quantification using a two-step approach with chaos collocation. In: ECCOMAS CFD, TU Delft, Netherlands; 2006.
20. Walters R, Huyse L. Uncertainty analysis for fluid mechanics with applications. ICASE Report No. 2002-1 (NASA/CR-2002-211449); 2002.
21. INRIA. TAPENADE: on-line automatic differentiation engine; 2002. http://tapenade.inria.fr:8080/tapenade/index.jsp.
22. Lucor D., Xiu D., Su C., Karniadakis G. Predictability and uncertainty in CFD. Int J Numer Meth Fl 2003, 43:483-505.
23. Knio O., LeMaître O. Uncertainty propagation in CFD using polynomial chaos decomposition. Fluid Dyn Res 2006, 38:616-640.
24. Loeven A, Witteveen J, Bijl H. Probabilistic collocation: an efficient non-intrusive approach for arbitrarily distributed parametric uncertainties. In: 45th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. AAIA Paper 2007-317, Reno, Nevada, USA; 2007.
25. Abgrall R. A simple, flexible and generic deterministic approach to uncertainty quantification in non-linear problems: application to fluid flow problems. Tech. Rep., INRIA; 2008. http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00325315/en/.
26. Cinnella P., Congedo P. Numerical solver for dense gas flows. AIAA J 2005, 43:2458-2461.
27. Congedo P., Corre C., Cinnella P. Airfoil shape optimization for transonic flows of Bethe-Zel'dovich-Thompson fluids. AIAA J 2007, 45:1303-1316.
28. Cinnella P., Congedo P. Optimal airfoil shapes for viscous transonic flows of Bethe-Zel'dovich-Thompson fluids. Comput Fluids 2008, 37:250-264.
29. Cinnella P, Congedo P. GA-hardness of aerodynamic optimization problems: analysis and proposed cures. In: 18th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference. AAIA Paper 2007-3828, Miami, Florida, USA; 2007.
30. Cinnella P., Congedo P. Inviscid and viscous aerodynamics of dense gases. J Fluid Mech 2007, 580:179-217.
31. Cinnella P. Transonic flows of dense gases over finite wings. Phys Fluids 2008, 20:1-17. 046103.
32. Cinnella P., Congedo P., Laforgia D. Transonic flows of BZT fluids through turbine cascades. Proceedings of the 3rd ICCFD conference 2004, 227-232. Springer-Verlag, Toronto, Canada, Berlin.
33. Congedo P, Cinnella P, Corre C. Shape optimization for dense gas flows in turbine cascades. In: Proceedings of ICCFD 4, Ghent, Belgium; 2006.
34. Martin J., Hou Y. Development of an equation of state for gases. AIChE J 1955, 1:142-151.
35. Emanuel G. Assessment of the MartinHou equation for modeling a non-classical fluid. J Fluids Eng 1996, 116:883-884.
36. Guardone A., Vigevano L., Argrow B. Assessment of thermodynamic models for dense gas dynamics. Phys Fluids 2004, 16:3878-3887.
37. Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E. Solutions of the euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes. AIAA Paper (8l-l259); 1981.
38. Rezgui A., Cinnella P., Lerat A. Third-order finite volume schemes for euler computations on curvilinear meshes. Comput Fluids 2001, 30:875-901.
39. Xiu D., Karniadakis G. Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. J Comput Phys 2003, 187:137-167.
40. Leveque R. Finite volume methods for hyperbolic problems 2002, Cambridge University Press, [p. 350-3].
41. Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms 2001, Wiley.
42. Srinivas N., Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using nondominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 1994, 2:221-248.