Is there a role for MRI in the preoperative assessment of patients with DCIS?

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2395-2400

  Allen, Lisa R ^a   Lago Toro, Claudia E ^b   Hughes, Jenevieve H ^b   Careaga, Eduardo ^b   Brown, Anjeanette T ^b   Chernick, Michael ^c   Barrio, Andrea V ^b   Frazier, Thomas G ^b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c LANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SIZE; CANCER SURGERY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77956341044     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1000-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. CJ Swallow KJ Van Zee V Sacchini PI Borgen 1996 Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: progress and controversy Curr Probl Surg. 33 553 608 10.1016/S0011-3840(05)80019-X 1:STN:280:DyaK28zjvFemug%3D%3D 8765465
2. B Fisher J Dignam N Wolmark E Mamounas J Costantino W Poller, et al. 1998 Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17 J Clin Oncol. 16 441 452 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ivFahuw%3D%3D 9469327
3. R Holland SH Veling M Mravunac JH Hendriks 1985 Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast conserving surgery Cancer. 56 979 990 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979:: AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO;2-N 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3lsVentA%3D%3D 2990668
4. RJ Bleicher M Morrow 2007 MRI and breast cancer: role in detection, diagnosis, and staging Oncology (Williston Park) 21 1521 1528
5. JH Menell EA Morris DD Dershaw AF Abramson E Brogi L Liberman 2005 Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging Breast J. 11 382 390 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.00121.x 16297080
6. ES Hwang K Kinkel LJ Esserman Y Lu N Weidner NM Hylton 2003 Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity Ann Surg Oncol. 10 381 388 10.1245/ASO.2003.03.085 12734086
7. NM Hansen A Growney 2007 Breast cancer: pre- and postoperative imaging for staging Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 16 447 463 10.1016/j.soc.2007.03.001 17560522
8. R Gilles B Zafrani JM Guinebretiere M Meunier O Lucidarme AA Tardivon, et al. 1995 Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation Radiology 196 415 419 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzktlWjtw%3D%3D 7617854
9. F Sardanelli GM Giuseppetti P Panizza M Bazzocchi A Fausto G Simonetti, et al. 2004 Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard AJR Am J. Roentgenol. 183 1149 1157 15385322
10. SE Harms DP Flamig KL Hesley MD Meiches RA Jensen WP Evans, et al. 1993 MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation Radiology. 187 493 501 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3jsVOluw%3D%3D 8475297
11. M Bazzocchi C Zuiani P Panizza C Del Frate F Soldano M Isola, et al. 2006 Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial AJR Am J. Roentgenol. 186 1723 1732 10.2214/A Jr%.04.1898 16714666
12. AP Schouten van der Velden C Boetes P Bult T Wobbes 2006 The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma Am J Surg. 192 172 178 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.02.026 16860625
13. R Katipamula AC Degnim TL Hoskin JC Boughey C Loprinzi CS Grant, et al. 2009 Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative MRI J Clin Oncol. 27 4082 4088 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4225 19636020
14. RJ Bleicher RM Ciocca BL Egleston L Sesa K Evers ER Sigurdson, et al. 2009 Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status J Am Coll Surg. 209 180 187 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010 19632594
15. F Sardanelli L Bacigalupo L Carbonaro A Esseridou GM Giuseppetti P Panizza, et al. 2008 What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard? Radiol Med. 113 439 451 10.1007/s11547-008-0250-0 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1cvpvVKltg%3D%3D 18414812
16. JK Onesti BE Mangus SD Helmer JS Osland 2008 Breast Cancer Tumor Size: Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and pathology measurements Am J Surg. 196 844 850 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.028 19095098
17. WA Berg L Gutierrez MS NessAiver WB Carter M Bhargavan RS Lewis, et al. 2004 Diagnostic accuracy of mammography. Clinical examination, US, and MR Imaging of preoperative assessment of breast cancer Radiology 233 830 849 10.1148/radiol.2333031484 15486214
18. SG Orel MH Mendonca C Reynolds MD Schnall LJ Solin DC Sullivan 1997 MR Imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ Radiology 202 413 420 1:STN:280: DyaK2s7mslekug%3D%3D 9015067
19. CK Kuhl 2000 Review article: MRI of breast tumors Eur Radiol. 10 46 58 10.1007/s003300050006 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jtVyksw%3D%3D 10663717
20. Morris E, Liberman L. Breast MRI: diagnosis and intervention. New York: Springer Science and Business Media; 2005.