Aesthetic outcome and oncological safety of nipple-areola complex replantation after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Volumn 63, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1490-1494

  Wirth, Raphael ^a   Banic, Andrej ^a   Erni, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Autologous tissue; Breast cancer; Depigmentation; Local recurrence; Skin sparing mastectomy; Tattooing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST AREOLA; BREAST NECROSIS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER INFILTRATION; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR FLAP; DEPIGMENTATION; DISTANT METASTASIS; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NIPPLE AREOLA COMPLEX REPLANTATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMPLANTATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TATTOOING; TRANSVERSE RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAP; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR RECURRENCE; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLE; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL FLAPS;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; NIPPLES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REPLANTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL FLAPS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956338317     PISSN: 17486815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.08.014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. B. McCormick, J. Wrigth, and P. Cordiero Breast reconstruction combined with radiation therapy: long-term risks and factors related to decision making Cancer J 14 2008 264 268
2. D.A. Hudson, and P.J. Skoll Single-stage, autologous breast restoration Plast Reconstr Surg 108 2001 1163 1171
3. C.M. McCarthy, A.L. Pusic, and L. Sclafani Breast cancer recurrence following prosthetic, postmastectomy reconstruction: incidence, detection, and treatment Plast Reconstr Surg 121 2008 381 388
4. G.W. Carlson, J. Bostwick, and T.M. Styblo Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism? Ann Surg Oncol 10 2003 108 112
5. S.S. Kroll, A. Khoo, and S.E. Singletary Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing mastectomy and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up Plast Reconstr Surg 104 1999 421 425
6. R.M. Simmons, S.K. Fish, and L. Gayle Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies Ann Surg Oncol 6 1999 676 681
7. B.A. Toth, and P. Lappert Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning Plast Reconstr Surg 87 1991 1048 1053
8. J.A. Andersen, J.B. Gram, and R.M. Pallesen Involvement of the nipple and areola in breast cancer Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 15 1981 39 42
9. R.G. Perry, T.C. Cochran, and F.G. Wolfort When is there nipple involvement in carcinoma of the breast? Plast Reconstr Surg 59 1977 535 537
10. R.S. Menon, and A.N. van Geel Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement Br J Cancer 59 1989 81 84
11. J. Ziswiler-Gietz, M. Makrodimou, and Y. Harder Outcome analysis of breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps Swiss Med Wkly 138 2008 114 120
12. M.A. Jabor, P. Shayani, and D.R. Collins Nipple-areolar reconstructions: satisfaction and clinical determinants Plast Reconstr Surg 110 2002 457 463
13. K.C. Shestak, A. Gabriel, and A. Landecker Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques Plast Reconstr Surg 110 2002 780 786
14. D.A. Hudson, A. Losken, and B. Moore One-stage immediate breast and nipple-areolar reconstruction with autologous tissue I: a preliminary report Ann Plast Surg 45 2000 471 476
15. R.M. Simmons, M. Brennan, and P. Christos Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 9 2002 165 168
16. C. Laronga, B. Kemp, and D. Johnston The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving skin-sparing mastectomy Ann Surg Oncol 6 1999 609 613
17. A. Banerjee, S. Gupta, and N. Bhattacharya Preservation of the nipple-areola complex in breast cancer - a clinicopathological assessment J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61 2008 1195 1198
18. Z. Vlajcic, R. Zic, and S. Stanec Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion Ann Plast Surg 55 2005 240 244
19. L.A. Newman, H.M. Kuerer, and K.K. Hunt Presentation, treatment, and outcome of local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction Ann Surg Oncol 5 1998 620 626
20. R.M. Greenway, L. Schlossberg, and W.C. Dooley Fifteen-year series of skin-sparing mastectomy for stage 0 to 2 breast cancer Am J Surg 190 2005 933 938
21. T.J. Meretoja, K.A.J. von Smitten, and M.H.K. Leidenius Local recurrence of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in a 15-years series Eur J Surg Oncol 33 2007 1142 1145
22. B. Gerber, A. Krause, and T. Reimer Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncological safe procedure Ann Surg 238 2003 120 127
23. H.H. HHikino, K.H. HKodama, and K.H. HYasui Intracystic adenomyoepithelioma of the breast - case report and review Breast Cancer 14 2007 429 433
24. N. Patani, and K. Mokbel Oncological and aesthetic considerations of skin-sparing mastectomy Breast Cancer Res Treat 111 2008 391 403