Intention-based corrective feedback generation using context-aware model

CSEDU 2010 - 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 11-18

  Lee, Sungjin ^a   Lee, Cheongjae ^a   Lee, Jonghoon ^a   Noh, Hyungjong ^a   Lee, Gary Geunbae ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conversational tutoring; Dialog system; Dialog based Computer Assisted Language Learning

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING; CONTEXT MODELS; CONTEXT-AWARE; CONVERSATIONAL TUTORING; DIALOG SYSTEMS; DIALOG-BASED COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING; GENERATION METHOD; HYBRID INFERENCE; HYBRID MODEL; LANGUAGE ACQUISITION;

LINGUISTICS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 77956337762     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Ai, H., Roque, A., Leuski, A., Traum, D. 2007. Using Information State to Improve Dialog Move Identification in a Spoken Dialog System In Proc. Interspeech 2007, Antwerp.
2. Bohus, D. and Rudnicky, A. 2003. RavenClaw: Dialog Management Using Hierarchical Task Decomposition and an Expectation Agenda. In Proc. Eurospeech 2003, Geneva.
3. Carroll, D. 2003. The Psychology of Language Wadsworth Publishing Co Inc. 4th edition.
4. Dasarathy, B. V. 1990. Nearest neighbor (NN) norms: NN pattern classification techniques Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.
5. Foster J. 2007. Treebanks Gone Bad: Parser evaluation and retraining using a treebank of ungrammatical sentences. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 10(3-4), 129-145.
6. Foster J. 2005. Good Reasons for Noting Bad Grammar: Empirical Investigations into the Parsing of Ungrammatical Written English. PhD Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Trinity College, University of Dublin.
7. Jung S., Lee C., Kim K, Lee G. G. 2009. Data-driven user simulation for automated evaluation of spoken dialog systems. Computer Speech and Language. 23(4):479-509, Oct 2009.
8. Lee C., Jung S., Kim S., Lee G. G. 2009. Example-based Dialog Modeling for Practical Multi-domain Dialog System. Speech Communication. 51(5):466-484, May 2009.
9. Lee S., Lee G. G. 2009. Realistic grammar error simulation using markov logic. To be published in Proceedings of the ACL 2009, Singapore, August 2009.
10. Long, M. H. 2005. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition in W. C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (eds): Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Academic Press, pp. 413-68.
11. McClelland, D. C. 1961. The achieving society New York: Van Nostrand.
12. Michaud L. N. 2002. Modeling User Interlanguage in a Second Language Tutoring System for Deaf Users of American Sign Language. PhD Dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware.
13. Morton, H. and Jack, M. A. 2005. Scenario-Based Spoken Interaction with Virtual Agents, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18:3 pp. 171-191.
14. Poesio, M. and Mikheev, A. 1998. The Predictive Power of Game Structure in Dialog Act Recognition: Experimental Results Using Maximum Entropy Estimation. In Proceedings of ICSLP-98.
15. Ratnaparkhi, A. 1998. Maximum Entropy Models for Natural Language Ambiguity Resolution, PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1998.
16. Raux, A. and Eskenazi, M. 2004. Using Task-Oriented Spoken Dialog Systems for Language Learning. Potential, Practical Applications and Challenges, Proceedings INSTIL.
17. Schneider, D. and McCoy, K. F. 1998. Recognizing Syntactic Errors in the Writing of Second Language Learners. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the Seventeenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL), Volume 2.
18. Swain, M. 1996. The output hypothesis: Theory and research in E. Hinkel (ed.): Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 471-83.