Constitutions, EU law and judicial strategies in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland

Journal of Public Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 81-99

  Matczak, Marcin ^a   Bencze, Matyas ^b   Khn, Zdenek ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

East Central Europe; formalism; judiciary; post communist countries

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK; EUROPEAN UNION; INTERNATIONAL LAW; POLICY APPROACH; POST-COMMUNISM;

CZECH REPUBLIC; HUNGARY; POLAND;

EID: 77956334119     PISSN: 0143814X     EISSN: 14697815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X09990195     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bencze M. (2007) Diszitoelem, dlcdzdhdlo vagy tartooszlop? A Magyar huntetohiroi gyakorlat viszonya az alkotmdnyhoz [Attitude of Hungarianjudges towards the constitution in criminal cases], Fundamentum, 3/2007, PP-5-21 ?
2. Bickel A, M, (1062) The Least Dangerous Branch. The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Yale University Press.
3. Bohek M. (2008) The fortress of judicial independence and the mental transitions of the central European judiciaries. European Public Law Vol. 14, issue 1. 2008. pp. 99-123.
4. Borucka-Arctowa M. Paiecki K. (2003) Sqdy w opinil spoieczenstiva polskiego [Courts in Polish society's opinion], Uniwersytet jagielloriski and Polpress.
5. Dworkin R. (1977) 'Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press.
6. Emmert F. (2003; Administrative and Court Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, European Law journal Vol. 9, No. 3, July 2003, pp. 288-315.
7. Gado G. (2008) Eltiro is egyezo dlidspontok az uj Ptk. elokiszjtise sordri [Different and identical viewpoints during the preparation of the new Civil Code], (Magyar jog, 6/2008) pp. 385-386.
8. Galiigan D. Matczak M, (2005) Strategies of Judicial Review. Exercising Judicial Discretion in Administrative Cases Involving Business Entities Ernst and Young Better Government Programme Report Warsaw.
9. Galiigan D. Matczak M. (2007) Formalism in Post-Communist Courts. Empirical Study on judicial Discretion in Polish Administrative Courts Deciding Business Cases, jw:j judicial Reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries, eel. Ram on a Com an and Jean-Michel De Waele, Vanden Broele, pp. 227-252.
10. Hack P., Fundamental rights in adjudication, Fundamentum, 3/2007, pp. 36-39.
11. lialmai G. (2002) The Hungarian Approach to Constitutional Review: The End of Activism? The First Decade of the Hungarian Constitutional Court, in Sadurski W. (ed.). Constitutional justice, East and West. Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective, 189, p. 209 (2002).
12. Hollander P. (2003) Ustavneprdvni argumentace. Ohlidnuti po deseti letech Ustavniho soudu jConstitutional Argumejitation: A Look Back at the Constitutional Court's First Ten Tears], Prague 2003.
13. Horeczky K., llonczai Zjolt Az iga zsdgszolgdltatds helyzete Magyarorszdgon. [Condition of Judicial Administration in Hungary] Birak Lapja, 1006/3-4. P. 243
14. -Ktihn Z. (2006) Precedent In the Czech Republic In E. Honclius (ed.), Precedent and the Laiv. Reports to the XVIIth Congress International Academy of Comparative Law Utrecht, 16-22 July 2006, Bruylant, Brussels 2007, pp. 371-306.
15. North D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p.3.
16. Palccki K. (2004) Stressing Legal Decisions. Basic Assumptions, in: IVR 21st World Congress, Lund Sweden, 12-18 August 2003, p.18.
17. Schauer F. ([988) Formalism 97, Yale LJ. 509.
18. Schaucr F. (1002) Playing by the Rules. A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Live, Oxford, Oxford LJniversity Press.
19. Solt P. speech at the Celebration of 10 years of Hungarian Judicial Reform, Budapest, Orszagyules alkotmanyiigyi, igazsagiigyi es Qgyrcndi bizottsaga, 2008, pp. 51-53.
20. Stawecki T. Staskiewicz W. Winczorek J. (2008) Between Polycentrism and Fragmentation. The Impact of Constitutional Tribunal Rulings on the Polish Legal Order, Ernst and Young Better Government Programme Report. Warsaw.
21. Szabo M. (2007) Change of Legal Thought in Hungary 1999-2005, in Andras Jakab, Peter Takacs and Allan F. Tatham (eds.i: The Transformation of the Hungarian Legal Order 1985-2005, Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands, pp. 590-601.
22. Wieacker F. (1995) A History of Private Law in Europe with particular reference to Germany, (Tony Weir transl.) Oxford, 442 ff.
23. Wolfe Ch. (1994) The Rise of Modern Judicial Review. From Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-Made law, Littler! eld Adams Quality Paperbacks, London.
24. Wroblewski J. (1992) The Judicial Application of Law. Kluwer, 250 ff.
25. Zweigert K. Kotz H. (1998) An Introduction to Comparative Law (T. Weir trans!.), Oxford, p.15
26. Zubek R. and Goetz K. H. (2010) Performing to Type? How State Institutions Matter in East Central Europe, Journal of Public Policy, 30 (1)