Possibilistic uncertainty analysis of a conceptual model of snowmelt runoff

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1681-1695

  Jacquin, A P ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DISCHARGE ESTIMATE; GLACIER MASS BALANCE; INCOMPLETE KNOWLEDGE; MODEL PERFORMANCE; MODEL REPRESENTATION; MODEL UNCERTAINTIES; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; PARAMETER VECTORS; POSSIBILISTIC; POSSIBILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; POSSIBILITY THEORY; PREDICTION UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY; PROBABILISTIC CALCULUS; REAL SYSTEMS; SNOW COVERS; SNOWMELT RUNOFF; SNOWMELT RUNOFF MODEL; UNBOUNDED OBSERVATION; UNCERTAINTY BOUNDS; WATERSHED MODELS;

CATCHMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GLACIERS; INFORMATION THEORY; RATING; RUNOFF; SNOW; SNOW MELTING SYSTEMS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CATCHMENT; DISCHARGE; GLACIAL HYDROLOGY; GLACIER MASS BALANCE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RUNOFF; SNOW COVER; SNOWMELT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATERSHED;

CHILE;

EID: 77956324071     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-14-1681-2010     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Amorocho, J. and Espildora, B.: Mathematical Simulation of the Snow Melting Processes, Water Science and Engineering Paper No. 3001, University of California, Davis, 1966.
2. Arcadis Geot́ecnica: Ingenieŕýa Conceptual Solucíon Ambiental ARD Proyecto Nueva Andina, CODELCO, Chile, 2007.
3. Arnold, S., Attinger, S., Frank, K., and Hildebrandt, A.: Uncertainty in parameterisation and model structure affect simulation results in coupled ecohydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1789-1807, doi:10.5194/hess-13-1789-2009, 2009.
4. Ayyub, B. M. and Klir, G. J.: Uncertainty modelling and analysis in engineering and the sciences, Chapman & Hall, Boca Rat́on, 2006.
5. B́ardossy, A., Mascellani, G., and Franchini, M.: Fuzzy unit hydrograph, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02401, doi:10.1029/2004WR003751, 2006.
6. Baudrit, C. and Dubois, D.: Comparing methods for joint objective and subjective uncertainty propagation with an example in a risk assessment, 4th International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, Pittsburgh, Pensilvania, 31-40, 2005.
7. Baudrit, C. and Dubois, D.: Practical Representations of Incomplete Probabilistic Knowledge, Comput. Stat. Data An., 51(1), 86-108, 2006.
8. Bates, B. C. and Townley, L. R.: Nonlinear, discrete flood event models, 3, Analysis of prediction uncertainty, J. Hydrol., 99, 91-101, 1988.
9. Beven, K. J.: A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18-36, 2006.
10. Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279-298, 1992.
11. Beven, K. J. and Freer, J.: Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11-29, 2001.
12. Cheng, D. K.: Analysis of Linear Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, 1959.
13. Civanlar, M. R. and Trussell, H. J.: Constructing Membership Functions Using Statistical Data, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 18, 1-13, 1986.
14. Dempster, A. P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping, Ann. Math. Stat., 38(2), 325-339, 1967.
15. Destercke, S. and Dubois, D.: Possibilistic Information Fusion Using Maximal Coherent Subsets, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 17(1), 79-92, 2009.
16. Dou, C., Woldt, W., Dahab, M., and Bogardi, I.: Transient groundwater flow simulation using a fuzzy set approach, GroundWater, 35(2), 205-215, 1997.
17. Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets and statistical data, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 25, 345-356, 1986.
18. Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: When upper probabilities are possibility measures, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 49, 65-74, 1992.
19. Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets and probability: Misunderstandings, bridges and gaps, in: Proceedings 2nd IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE'93, San Francisco, California, 28 March-4 April 1993, 1059-1068, 1993.
20. Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Possibility theory and data fusion in poorly informed environments, Control Eng. Pract., 2(5), 811-823, 1994.
21. Dubois, D. and Prade, H.: Possibility theory: Qualitative and quantitative aspects, in: Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Vol. 1: Quantified Representation of Uncertainty and Imprecision, edited by: Gabbay, D. M. and Smets, P., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 169-226, 1998.
22. Dubois, D., Foulloy, L., Mauris, G., and Prade, H.: Probabilitypossibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets, and probabilistic inequalities, Reliab. Comput., 10, 2004, 273-297, 2004.
23. Dubois, D., Moral, S., and Prade, H.: A semantics for possibility theory based on likelihoods, J. Math. Annal. Appl., 205, 359-380, 1997.
24. Dubois, D., Prade, H., and Smets, P.: A definition of subjective possibility, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 48, 352-364, 2008.
25. Engeland, K., Xu, C.-Y., and Gottschalk, L.: Assessing uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Bayesian methodology, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 50(1), 45-63, 2005.
26. Esṕýldora, B.: Instalacíon y operacíon de un laboratorio de hidroloǵýa de nieves, Seccion Hidrologia y Riego, Departamento de Obras Civiles, Universidad de Chile, Chile, 1968.
27. Ferson, S. and Ginzburg, L. R.: Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 54, 133-144, 1996.
28. Freissinet, C., Vauclin, M., and Erlich, M.: Comparison of firstorder analysis and fuzzy set approach for the evaluation of imprecision in a pesticide groundwater pollution screening model, J. Contam. Hydrol., 37, 21-43, 1999.
29. Ghosh, S. and Mujumdar, P. P.: Climate change impact assessment: Uncertainty modeling with imprecise probability, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D18113, doi:10.1029/2008JD011648, 2009.
30. Hall, J. W.: Uncertainty-based sensitivity indices for imprecise probability distributions, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 91(10-11), 1443-1451, 2006.
31. Jacquin, A. P. and Shamseldin, A. Y.: Development of a possibilistic method for the evaluation of predictive uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 43, W04425, doi:10.1029/2006WR005072, 2007.
32. Jacquin, A. P. and Shamseldin, A. Y.: Possibilistic uncertainty analysis of hydrological models, in: 8th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, Concepcíon, 12-16 January 2009, conf188a41, 2009.
33. Kamann, P. G.: Prońostico estacional de deshielos en base a simulaci ́on, Memoria para Optar al T́ýtulo de Ingeniero Civil, Universidad T́ecnica Federico Santa Maŕýa, Chile, 1998.
34. Klir, G. J. and Folger, T. A.: Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information, Prentice Hall, Singapore, 1992.
35. Klir, G. J. and Geer, J. F.: Information-preserving probabilitypossibility transformations: Recent developments, in: Fuzzy Logic, edited by: Lowen, R. and Roubens, M., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 417-428, 1993.
36. Kuckzera, G.: On the validity of first order prediction limits for conceptual hydrologic models, J. Hydrol., 103, 229-247, 1988.
37. Lei, J. H. and Schilling,W.: Preliminary uncertainty analysis-a prerequisite for assessing the predictive uncertainty of hydrologic models, Water Sci. Technol., 33(2), 79-90, 1996.
38. Martin-Clouaire, R., Cazemier, D. R., and Lagacherie, P.: Representing and processing uncertain soil information for mapping soil hydrological properties, Comput. Electron. Agr., 29, 41-57, 2000.
39. Matott, L. S., Babendreier, J. E., and Purucker, S. T.: Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: A review of concepts and tools, Water Resour. Res., 45, W06421, doi:10.1029/2008WR007301, 2009.
40. Misirli, F., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Thiemann, M.: Bayesian recursive estimation of parameter and output uncertainty for watershed models, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A., and Turcotte, R. V., American Geophysical Union, Washington, 113-124, 2003.
41. Montanari, A.: Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations, Water Resour. Res., 41, W08406, doi:10.1029/2004WR003826, 2005.
42. Montanari, A., Shoemaker, C. A., and van de Giesen, N.: Introduction to special section on Uncertainty Assessment in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology: An overview of issues and challenges, Water Resour. Res., 45, W00B00, doi:10.1029/2009WR008471, 2009.
43. Mujumdar, P. P. and Ghosh, S.: Modeling GCM and scenario uncertainty using a possibilistic approach: Application to the Mahanadi River, India, Water Resour. Res., 44, W06407, doi:10.1029/2007WR006137, 2008.
44. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I - A discussion of principles, J. Hydrol., 10, 282-290, 1970.
45. Nijssen, D., Schumann, A., Pahlow, M., and Klein, B.: Planning of technical flood retention measures in large river basins under consideration of imprecise probabilities of multivariate hydrological loads, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 1349-1363, doi:10.5194/nhess-9-1349-2009, 2009.
46. Ozelkan E. C. Duckstein L. Fuzzy conceptual rainfall-runoff models J. Hydrol. 253: 41-68: 2001
47. Pappenberger, F. and Beven, K.: Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis, Water Resour. Res., 42, W05302, doi:10.1029/2005WR004820, 2006.
48. Renard, B., Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., Thyer, M. A., and Franks, S. W.: Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors, Water Resour. Res., 46, W05521, doi:10.1029/2009WR008328, 2010.
49. Rivera, A., Acuña, C., Casassa, G., and Bown, F.: Use of remotely sensed and field data to estimate the contribution of Chilean glaciers to eustatic sea-level rise, Ann. Glaciol. 34, 367-372, 2002.
50. Romanowicz, R., Beven, K., and Tawn, J. A.: Evaluation of predictive uncertainty in nonlinear hydrological models using a Bayesian approach, in: Statistics for the Environment 2: Water Related Issues, edited by: Barnett, V. and Feridun Turkman, K., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 297-317, 1994.
51. Rojas, R., Batelaan, O., Feyen, L., and Dassargues, A.: Assessment of conceptual model uncertainty for the regional aquifer Pampa del Tamarugal - North Chile, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 171- 192, doi:10.5194/hess-14-171- 2010, 2010.
52. Ross, T. J., Sellers, K. F., and Booker, J. M.: Considerations for using fuzzy set theory and probability theory, in: Fuzzy logic and probability applications: Building the gap, ASA-SIAM Series on Statistics and Applied Probability, edited by: Ross, T. J., Booker, J. M., and Parkinson, W. J., SIAM, Philadelphia, ASA, Alexandria, 87-104, 2002.
53. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976.
54. Seibert, J.: Estimation of Parameter Uncertainty in the HBV Model, Nord. Hydrol., 28(4/5), 247-262, 1997.
55. Thiemann, M., Trosset, M., Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S.: Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 37(10), 2521-2535, 2001.
56. Thorsen, M., Refsgaard, J. C., Hansen, S., Pebesma, E., Jensen, J. B., and Kleeschulte, S.: Assessment of uncertainty in simulation of nitrate leaching to aquifers at catchment scale, J. Hydrol., 242, 210-227, 2001.
57. Valdivia, P.: Inventario de glaciares Andes de Chile central (32°- 35° Lat. S): Hoyas de los Ŕýos Aconcagua, Maipo, Cachapoal y Tinguiririca, in: Jornadas de Hidroloǵýa de Nieves y Hielos en Aḿerica del Sur, PHI, UNESCO, Santiago, Chile, 3-8 December 1984, I6.1-I6.24, 1984.
58. Verhoest, N. E. C., De Baets, B., Mattia, F., Satalino, G., Lucau, C., and Defourny, P.: A possibilistic approach to soil moisture retrieval from ERS synthetic aperture radar backscattering under soil roughness uncertainty, Water Resour. Res, 43, W07435, doi:10.1029/2006WR005295, 2007.
59. Wagener, T., Wheater, H. S., and Gupta, H. V.: Identification and evaluation of watershed models, in: Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by: Duan, Q., Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., Rousseau, A. N., and Turcotte, R., American Geophysical Union, Washington, 29-47, 2003.
60. Water Management Ltda.: Evaluacíon Recursos H́ýdricos Salar Punta Negra, Compañ́ýa Minera Escondida, Chile, 2001.
61. Wolkenhauer, O.: Possibility Theory with Applications to data analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998.
62. Yu, P.-S., Yang, T. C., and Chen, S. J.: Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall-runoff model, J. Hydrol., 244, 43-59, 2001.
63. Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy Sets, Inform. Control, 8(3), 338-353, 1965.
64. Zadeh, L. A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 1, 3-28, 1978.
65. Zadeh, L. A.: Possibility theory and soft data analysis, in: Mathematical Frontiers of the Social and Policy Sciences, edited by: Cob, B. L. and Thrall, R. M.,Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 69-129, 1981.
66. Zadeh, L. A. and Desoer, C. A.: Linear System Theory: The State Space Approach, McGraw-Hill, New York, London, 1963.
67. Zehe, E. and Blöschl, G.: Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: The role of initial conditions, Water Resour. Res., 40, W10202, doi:10.1029/2003WR002869, 2004.
68. Zhang, K., Li, H., and Achari, G.: Fuzzy-stochastic characterization of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer, J. Contam. Hydrol., 106, 73-82, 2009.
69. Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Fourth Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2001.