Argument mining using highly structured argument repertoire

Educational Data Mining 2008 - 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 202-209

  Abbas, Safia ^a   Sawamura, Hajime ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION THEORY; INTERCHANGE FORMATS; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; MINING TECHNIQUES; SEMI-STRUCTURED; TECHNIQUES AND RESULTS; TEXTUAL DATA;

DATA MINING; EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 77956317456     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. S. Modgil I. Rahawan C. Reed et.al. C. Chesnevar, J. McGinnis. Towards an argument interchange format. In The Knowledge Engineering Review, volume Vol. 00:0, pages 1-25. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
2. et.al. D. Walton G. Rowe. Araucaria as a tool for diagramming arguments in teaching and studying philosophy. In Teaching Philosophy, volume Vol. 29, pages 111-124, 2006.
3. C. Reed G. Rowe and J. katzav. Araucaria: Making up argument. In European Conference on Computing and Philosophy, 2003.
4. M. Godden and D. Walton. Argument from expert opinion as legal evidence: Critical questions and admissibility criteria of expert testimony in the american legal system. In Ratio Juris, volume Vol 19, pages 261-286, 2006.
5. H.Ahonen-Myka. finding all maximal frequent sequences in text. In Proceeding of ICML99 workshop, 1999.
6. F. Zablith, I. Rahawan and C. Reed. The foundation for a world wide argument web. In Artificial Intelligence Conference (AAAI). published in the Artificial Intelligence Journal, April 04, 2007.
7. M. Baker J. Andriessen and D. Suthers. Arguing to learn confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. In Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, volume Vol.1, 2003.
8. C. Reed J. Katzav and G. Rowe. Argument research corpus. In M.-P. Huget (ed.), Communication in Multiagent Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, volume Vol.2650, pages pp. 269-283, 2003.
9. H. Prakken and G. Vreeswijk. Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenther, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pages 219-318. Kluwer, 2002.
10. R. Srikant R. Agrawal. Fast algorithms for mining rules. In Proceeding of the 20th VLDB Conference Santiago, Chile, 1994.
11. I. Rahawan and P.V. Sakeer. Representing and querying arguments on semantic web. In Computational Models of Argument, P.E. Dunne and T.J.M. Bench-Capon (Eds.), IOS Press, 2006.
12. C. Reed and G. Rowe. Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. In International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, volume Vol.13, page pp.983, 2004.
13. R.R. Muntz. et.al. Y. Chi. Frequent subtree mining-an overview. In Fundamenta Informaticae, pages pp.1001-1038, 2001.