Preimplantation mouse embryo selection guided by light-induced dielectrophoresis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Valley, Justin K ^a   Swinton, Paul ^b   Boscardin, W John ^c   Lue, Tom F ^b   Rinaudo, Paolo F ^b   Wu, Ming C ^a   Garcia, Maurice M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CONDUCTANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHORESIS; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO GROWTH; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; REPRODUCIBILITY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; LIGHT; STANDARD;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; ELECTROPHORESIS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; LIGHT; MICE;

EID: 77956316591     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010160     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG (1978) Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 2: 366.
2. Kjellberg AT, Carlsson P, Bergh C (2006) Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum Reprod 21: 210-216.
3. Kovalevsky G, Patrizio P (2005) High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States. Fertil Steril 84: 325-330.
4. Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, Correa A, Hobbs CA, et al. (2009) Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod 24: 360-366.
5. Ludwig AK, Diedrich K, Ludwig M (2005) The process of decision making in reproductive medicine. Semin Reprod Med 23: 348-353.
6. www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0 SART (2007) Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART): Assisted Reproductive Success Rates. National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports. Centers for Disease Control, USA. See https://www.sartcorsonline.com/ rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0 (Accessed August 14, 2009].
7. Gurgan T, Demirol A (2004) Why and how should multiple pregnancies be prevented in assisted reproduction treatment programmes? Reprod Biomed Online 9: 237-244.
8. Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjo T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm UB (1999) Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 354: 1579-1585.
9. www.asrm.org/Patients/faqs.html#Q6 ASRM (2009) American Society of Reproductive Medicine: Frequently Asked Questions About Infertility (See http://www.asrm.org/Patients/faqs.html#Q6:).
10. www.cdc.gov/ART CDC (2009) Assisted Reproductive Technology: Home (See: http://cdc.gov/ART).
11. Nagy ZP, Sakkas D, Behr B (2008) Symposium: innovative techniques in human embryo viability assessment. Non-invasive assessment of embryo viability by metabolomic profiling of culture media ('metabolomics'). Reprod Biomed Online 17: 502-507.
12. Warner CM, Lampton PW, Newmark JA, Cohen J (2008) Symposium: innovative techniques in human embryo viability assessment. Soluble human leukocyte antigen-G and pregnancy success. Reprod Biomed Online 17: 470-485.
13. Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK, Lane M, Schlenker T, Hamilton F, et al. (1999) Blastocyst culture and transfer: analysis of results and parameters affecting outcome in two in vitro fertilization programs. Fertil Steril 72: 604-609.
14. Dessie SW, Rings F, Holker M, Gilles M, Jennen D, et al. (2007) Dielectrophoretic behavior of in vitro-derived bovine metaphase II oocytes and zygotes and its relation to in vitro embryonic developmental competence and mRNA expression pattern. Reproduction 133: 931-946.
15. Jones TB (1995) Electromechanics of Particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Fiedler S, Shirley SG, Schnelle T, Fuhr G (1998) Dielectrophoretic sorting of particles and cells in a microsystem. Analytical Chemistry 70: 1909-1915.
17. Hsu H-Y, Ohta AT, Chiou P-Y, Jamshidi A, Neale SL, et al. (2009) Phototransistor-based optoelectronic tweezers for dynamic cell manipulation in cell culture media. Lab on a Chip;DOI: 10.1039/b906593h.
18. Ohta AT, Chiou PY, Han TH, Liao JC, Bhardwaj U, et al. (2007) Dynamic Cell and Microparticle Control via Optoelectronic Tweezers. Microelectromechanical Systems, Journal of 16: 491-499.
19. Jamshidi A, Pauzauskie PJ, Schuck PJ, Ohta AT, Chiou P-Y, et al. (2008) Dynamic manipulation and separation of individual semiconducting and metallic nanowires. Nat Photon 2: 86-89.
20. Smith PA, Nordquist CD, Jackson TN, Mayer TS, Martin BR, et al. (2000) Electric-field assisted assembly and alignment of metallic nanowires. Applied Physics Letters 77: 1399-1401.
21. Gascoyne P, Huang Y, Pethig R, Vykoukal J, Becker FF (1992) Dielectrophoretic separation of mamallian cells studied by computerized image analysis. Measurement Science & Technology 3: 439-445.
22. Wang X, Huang Y, Burt JPH, Markx GH, Pethig R (1993) Selective Dielectrophoretic confinement of bioparticles in potential energy wells. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 26: 1278-1285.
23. Huang Y, Holzel R, Pethig R, Wang XB (1992) Differences in the AC electrodynamics of viable and non-viable yeast cells determined through combined dielectrophoresis and electrorotation studies. Phys Med Biol 37: 1499-1517.
24. Huang Y, Wang XB, Becker FF, Gascoyne PR (1997) Introducing dielectrophoresis as a new force field for field-flow fractionation. Biophys J 73: 1118-1129.
25. Yang J, Huang Y, Wang XB, Becker FF, Gascoyne PR (1999) Cell separation on microfabricated electrodes using dielectrophoretic/gravitational field-flow fractionation. Anal Chem 71: 911-918.
26. Becker FF, Wang XB, Huang Y, Pethig R, Vykoukal J, et al. (1995) SEPARATION OF HUMAN BREAST-CANCER CELLS FROM BLOOD BY DIFFERENTIAL DIELECTRIC AFFINITY. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92: 860-864.
27. Chiou PY, Ohta AT, Wu MC (2005) Massively parallel manipulation of single cells and microparticles using optical images. Nature 436: 370-372.
28. Ashkin A, Dziedzic JM, Yamane T (1987) Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams. Nature 330: 769-771.
29. Grigorenko AN, Roberts NW, Dickinson MR, Zhang Y (2008) Nanometric optical tweezers based on nanostructured substrates. Nat Photon 2: 365-370.
30. Lei U, Huang CW, Chen J, Yang CY, Lo YJ, et al. (2009) A travelling wave dielectrophoretic pump for blood delivery. Lab on a Chip 9: 1349-1356.
31. Manaresi N, Romani A, Medoro G, Altomare L, Leonardi A, et al. (2003) A CMOS chip for individual cell manipulation and detection. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of 38: 2297-2305.
32. Choi W, Kim JS, Lee DH, Lee KK, Koo DB, et al. (2008) Dielectrophoretic oocyte selection chip for in vitro fertilization. Biomedical Microdevices 10: 337-345.
33. Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD (2009) Creasy and Resnik's maternal-fetal medicine: principles and practice. PhiladelphiaPA: Saunders/Elsevier.
34. Benos DJ (1981) Developmental changes in epithelial transport characteristics of preimplantation rabbit blastocysts. The Journal of Physiology 316: 191-202.
35. Palmer JF, Slack C (1970) SOME BIO-ELECTRIC PARAMETERS OF EARLY XENOPUS EMBRYOS. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 24: 535-&.
36. Biggers JD (1998) Reflections on the culture of the preimplantation embryo. International Journal of Developmental Biology 42: 879-884.